1887
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

EU is a discursive field where multiple meanings and representations are created, negotiated and contested. Research has shown that the concept possess an interpretive power often used as an instrument of political confrontation. Such is the case, this study argues, with the two largest Macedonian parties – VMRO-DPMNE and the Social Democrats – who in a pursuit of changing or maintaining the power structuration in the society have produced a discourse on EU that best fits their political agendas. In a situation of a prolonged political crisis, and a significant involvement of EU, the two parties have commodified the discourse on EU into an instrument of self-promotion and/or criticism of the other. Demonstrating the instrumental use of the representations of EU by analysing the discursive strategies and the linguistic means deployed are the general aims of this study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18019.tak
2019-04-18
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Angouri, Jo, and Ruth Wodak
    2014 “They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right.” Discourse & Society25(4): 540–565. 10.1177/0957926514536955
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536955 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brief
    Brief 2014 Заев: Само на Груевски и фамилијата им одговара да ја изгубиме препораката за ЕУ,поради милионските бизниси. [Zaev: Only Gruevski and his family will profit from losing the recommendations]. Brief, 24June. Available atwww.brif.mk/zaev-samo-na-gruevski-i-familijata-im-o/ (accessed2 October 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinar, Irena, and Marjan Svetlicic
    1999 “Enlargement of the European Union: The Case of Slovenia.” Journal of European Public Policy6(5): 802–21. 10.1080/135017699343397
    https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343397 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  5. Conti, Nicolo
    2007 “Domestic parties and European integration: The problem of party attitudes to the EU, and the europeanisation of parties.” European Political Science6:192–207. 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210129
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210129 [Google Scholar]
  6. Conti, Nicolo, Swen Hutter, and Nanou Kyriaki
    2018 “Party competition and political representation in crisis: An introductory note.” Party Politics24(1): 3–9. 10.1177/1354068817740758
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740758 [Google Scholar]
  7. Damjanovski, Ivan
    2018Analysis of Public Opinion on Macedonia`s Accession to the European Union (2014–2017). Konrad Adenauer Foundation in the Republic of Macedonia Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis” – Skopje; available at: https://idscs.org.mk/en/portfolio/analysis-public-opinion-macedonias-accession-european-union-2014-2017/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Delanty, Gerard
    1995Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 10.1057/9780230379657
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379657 [Google Scholar]
  9. Deutsche Welle
    Deutsche Welle 2016 Иванов за „Билд“: 25 години ЕУ нѐ лаже и манипулира! [Ivanov for “Der Bild”: For 25 years EU has lied and manipulated us!] Available at: www.dw.com/mk/%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B4-25-%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8-%D0%B5%D1%83-%D0%BD%D1%90-%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B5-%D0%B8-%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0/a-19110467?maca=maz-rss-maz-pol_makedonija_timemk-4727-xml-mrss (accessed2 October 2017).
  10. Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, L. Wolfgang Muller, Katrin Praprotnik, and Anna Katharina Winkler
    2016 “Beyond salience and position taking: How political parties communicate through their manifestos.” Party Politics: 1–13
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fonseca, Pedro, and Maria João Ferreira
    2015 “Through ‘seas never before sailed’: Portuguese government discursive legitimation strategies in a context of financial crisis.” Discourse & Society26 (6): 682–711. 10.1177/0957926515592780
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515592780 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortchner, Bernhard, and Christoffer Kølvraa
    2012 “Narrating a ‘new Europe’: From ‘bitter past’ to self-righteousness?” Discourse & Society23:377–400. 10.1177/0957926512441108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441108 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde
    1995 “How does one become a good European?’ : The British press and European integration.” Discourse & Society6: 177–205. 10.1177/0957926595006002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hellstrom, Anders
    2009 “Teaching Europeans how to be Europeans.” Journal of Language and Politics8: 167–194. 10.1075/jlp.8.2.01hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.01hel [Google Scholar]
  15. Henderson, Karen
    (ed) 1999Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union. London. UCL press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hood, Cristopher
    2011The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson
    2002 “Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?” Comparative Political Studies35: 965–989. 10.1177/001041402236310
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402236310 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Guillem Vidal
    2018 “Old versus new politics: The political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises.” Party Politics24(1): 10–22. 10.1177/1354068817694503
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817694503 [Google Scholar]
  19. Just, Sine Norholm
    2009 “No place like home? The role of the media in the framing of Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics8: 244–268. 10.1075/jlp.8.2.04jus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.04jus [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanal 5
    Kanal 5 2015Gruevski: влез во НАТО и ЕУ останува наша стратешка цел. [Gruevski: entering NATO and EU remains our strategic goal], available at:kanal5.com.mk/vesti_detail.asp?ID=68210 (accessed28 October 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kopecky, Petr, and Cas Mudde
    2002 “The two sides of Euroscepticism: party positions on Euroscepticism in East Central Europe.” European Union Politics3(3): 297–326. 10.1177/1465116502003003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kosic, Ankica, and Anna Triandafyllidou
    2004 “Representations of the European Union and the nation(-state) in Italian party discourse: A critical analysis of electoral platforms and parliamentary debates.” Journal of Language and Politics3: 53–80. 10.1075/jlp.3.1.06kos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.06kos [Google Scholar]
  23. Krzyżanowski, Michal, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak
    2018 “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Europe.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1-2): 1–14. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ladrech, Robert
    2002 “Europeanization and political parties: Towards a Framework for Analysis.” Party Politics8: 389–403. 10.1177/1354068802008004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008004002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Majstorovic, Danijela
    2007 “Construction of Europeanization in the High Representatives discourse in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Discourse & Society18: 627–651. 10.1177/0957926507079635
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507079635 [Google Scholar]
  26. Malmberg, Af Mikael, and Bo Strath
    2002 “Introduction: The national meanings of Europe.” InThe Meaning of Europe: Variety and Contention within and among Nations, edited byMikael Af Malmberg and Bo Strath, 1–26. Oxford and New York: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Netpress
    Netpress 2015Иванов: На регионот му е потребна недоложна интеграција во ЕУ и НАТО [Ivanov: the region needs an urgent integration in EU and NATO]. Available at: netpress.com.mk/ivanov-na-regionot-mu-e-potrebna-neodlozhna-integracija-vo-eu-i-nato/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Oberhuber, Florian, Christoph Bärenreuter, Michal Krzyzanowski, Heinz Schönbauer, and Ruth Wodak
    2005 “Debating the European Constitution: On representations of Europe/the EU in the press.” Journal of Language and Politics2: 227–271. 10.1075/jlp.4.2.05obe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.05obe [Google Scholar]
  29. Pagden, Anthony
    2002 “Europe: conceptualizing a continent.” InThe Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to European Union, edited byAnthony Pagden, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511496813.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511496813.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pirro, Andrea LP., Paul Taggart, and Stijn van Kessel
    2018 “The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: Comparative conclusions.” Politics38 (3): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Paul Taggart
    (eds) 2008Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
    Social Democratic Union of Macedonia 2011Имаме решенија [We have solutions], election program. Available at: arhiva.sdsm.org.mk/upload/PROGRAMA_PDF_Web.pdf (accessedOctober 27 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Social Democratic Union of Macedonia
    Social Democratic Union of Macedonia 2016План за живот во Македонија [Plan for a life in Macedonia], election program. Available at: zazivot.mk/plan/ (accessed27 October 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SDSM
    SDSM 2016bАВМУ призна вина, реформи во медиумскиот простор се неопходни [AMVU admitted guilt, reforms in the media are necessary], Available at: www.sdsm.org.mk/News.aspx?idNews=1662&lng=1 (accessed28 October 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stojic, Marko
    2006 “Between Europhobia and Europhilia: Party and popular attitudes towards membership of the European union in Serbia and Croatia.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society7 (3): 312–335. 10.1080/15705850601053451
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850601053451 [Google Scholar]
  37. Vecer
    Vecer 2015Груевски испука поситивни бомби [Gruevski fired positive bombs] available at: vecer.mk/makedonija/gruevski-ispuka-pozitivni-bombi
    [Google Scholar]
  38. VMRO DPMNE
    VMRO DPMNE 2014Проверено [checked], election program. Available at: https://vmro-dpmne.org.mk/node/2758 (accessed2 October 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  39. VMRO DPMNE
    VMRO DPMNE 2016Реално [Real], election program. Available at: https://vmro-dpmne.org.mk/ (accessed2 October 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Weiss, Gilbert
    2002 “Searching for Europe: The problem of legitimisation and representation in recent political speeches on Europe.” Journal of Language and Politics1 (1): 59–83. 10.1075/jlp.1.1.06wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.1.1.06wei [Google Scholar]
  41. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
    1999The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zielonka, Jan
    2013 “Europe’s new civilizing missions: the EU’s normative power discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies18: 35–55. 10.1080/13569317.2013.750172
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2013.750172 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18019.tak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18019.tak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error