1887
image of Language ideological debates about linguistic landscapes
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In 2013, Richmond city council was presented with a petition calling for the regulation of all language signs, drawing national attention to the amount of Chinese-only signage. The signage debate has become well-known in Canada as a result of the media, which has provided a platform for debate through online reader commentary. By applying concepts from linguistic landscapes, language ideologies and nationalism in addition to analytical tools from SFL, we employ critical discourse studies to examine how representations of and responses to language signage in online news commentary contribute to the construction of in-groups and out-groups in the Canadian context. Findings show that stereotypical representations of ethnicity and culture are represented as a threat to the Canadian status quo. Also, contradictory ideologies of Canadian official bilingualism are employed to justify discrimination against Chinese language speakers. Findings suggest that language ideologies remain deeply tied to understandings of Canadian nationhood and belonging.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18030.ves
2020-06-16
2020-07-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict
    1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Angermeyer, Phillip S.
    2017 “Controlling Roma refugees with ‘Google-Hungarian’: Indexing deviance, contempt, and belonging in Toronto’s linguistic landscape.” Language in Society46 (2): 159–183. 10.1017/S0047404516001020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516001020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazerman, Charles
    2004 “Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts.” InWhat Writing Does and How it Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, edited byCharles Bazerman and P. Prior, 83–96. New York: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell, Allan
    1991The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloemraad, Irene
    2016Understanding “Canadian Exceptionalism” in Immigration and Pluralism Policy. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, Jan
    2013Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloor, Meriel and Thomas Bloor
    2017 “Systemic functional linguistics.” InRoutledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byJohn Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 151–164. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-11 [Google Scholar]
  9. Britten, Liam
    2017 “Language restrictions proposed for Richmond’s new sign bylaw.” CBC News, June7 2017 www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/richmond-signs-chinese-english-1.4150456
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Charland, Maurice
    1986 “Technological nationalism.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory10 (1–2): 196–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cummins, Jim and Marcel Danesi
    1990Heritage Languages: The Development and Denial of Canada’s Linguistic Resources. Toronto: Garamond.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Duchêne, Alexandre and Monica Heller
    (eds) 2007Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunmire, Patricia
    1997 “Naturalizing the future in factual discourse: A critical linguistic analysis of a projected event.” Written Communication12 (2): 221–264. 10.1177/0741088397014002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014002003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, John
    (ed.) 1998Language in Canada. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620829
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620829 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2011Challenges in the Social Life of Languages. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230302204
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302204 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eggins, Suzanne
    2004An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2nd ed.New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fairclough, Norman
    1989/2001Language and Power. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1995Media Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fiedler, Rob, Nadine Schuurman and Jennifer Hyndman
    2006 “Hidden homelessness: An indicator-based approach for examining the geographies of recent immigrants at-risk of homelessness in Greater Vancouver.” Cities23 (3): 205–216. 10.1016/j.cities.2006.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fowler, Roger, Gunther Kress, Robert Hodge and Tony Trew
    (eds) 1979Language and Control. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gellner, Ernest
    1983Nations and Nationalism. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson, Anna
    2019 “Free speech and safe spaces: How moderation policies shape online discussion spaces.” Social Media + Society5 (1): 1–15. 10.1177/2056305119832588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832588 [Google Scholar]
  24. Guo, Yan
    2013 “Language policies and programs for adult immigrants in Canada: A critical analysis.” Canadian Ethnic Studies Journal45 (1–2): 23–41. 10.1353/ces.2013.0022
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ces.2013.0022 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hager, Mike
    2013 “New minority’ in Richmond fail in push for inclusion of English on signs.” Vancouver Sun, March19 2013 www.vancouversun.com/life/minority+Richmond+fail+push+inclusion+English+signs/8117068/story.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2013Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th Ed.London: Arnold. 10.4324/9780203431269
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269 [Google Scholar]
  27. Haque, Eve
    2012Multiculturalism Within a Bilingual Framework: Language, Race, and Belonging in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442686083
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442686083 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heller, Monica
    1999 “Heated language in a cold climate.” InLanguage ideological debates, edited byJan Blommaert, 143–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110808049.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808049.143 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heller, Monica and Alexandre Duchêne
    2012 “Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation state.” InLanguage in Late Capitalism: Pride and profit, edited byAlexandre Duchêne and Monica Heller, 1–21. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow
    2010 “Introducing semiotic landscapes.” InSemiotic Landscapes, edited byAdam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 1–40. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kurl, Shachi
    2016What Makes Us Canadian? A study of Values, Beliefs, Priorities and Identity. Vancouver, BC: Angus Reid Institute, Public Interest Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kymlicka, Will
    2004 “Marketing Canadian pluralism in the international arena.” International Journal59 (4): 829–2. 10.1177/002070200405900407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002070200405900407 [Google Scholar]
  33. Landry, Rodrigue and Richard Y. Bourhis
    1997 “Linguistic landscape and ethno-linguistic vitality: An empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology16 (1): 23–49. 10.1177/0261927X970161002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Juan
    2011 “Collision of language in news discourse: A functional-cognitive perspective on transitivity.” Critical Discourse Studies8 (3): 203–219. 10.1080/17405904.2011.586231
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.586231 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lou, Jackie J.
    2010 “Chinese on the side: The marginalization of Chinese in the linguistic and social landscapes of Chinatown in Washington, DC.” InLinguistic Landscape and the City, edited byElana Shohamy, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni, 96–114. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Matheson, Donald
    2005Media discourse: Analysing Media Texts. Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Medeiros, Mike
    2019 National frenemies: Linguistic intergroup attitudes in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies42 (16): 3–22. 10.1080/01419870.2017.1406610
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1406610 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mitchell, Thomas D.
    2010 “‘A Latino community takes hold’: Reproducing semiotic landscapes in media discourse.” InSemiotic Landscapes, edited byAdam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 168–186. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Raboy, Marc
    1991 “Canadian broadcasting, Canadian nationhood: Two concepts, two solitudes and great expectations.” Electronic Journal of Communication1 (2). Retrieved on16 October 2017, fromwww.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/001/2/00123.HTML
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reyes, Antonio
    2013 “Don’t touch my language: Attitudes toward institutional language reforms.” Current Issues in Language Planning14 (2): 337–357. 10.1080/14664208.2013.812946
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.812946 [Google Scholar]
  41. Richardson, John
    2007Analysing Newspapers: An Approach From Critical Discourse Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20968‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 [Google Scholar]
  42. Richmond City Council
    Richmond City Council 2016 “Language Hot Facts.” RetrievedOctober 16, 2017. https://www.richmond.ca/__shared/assets/Languages6251.pdf
  43. Santana, Arthur D.
    2011 “Online readers’ comments represent new opinion pipeline.” Newspaper Research Journal32 (3): 66–81. 10.1177/073953291103200306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291103200306 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheyholislami, Jaffer
    2011Kurdish Identity, Discourse, and New Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230119307
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119307 [Google Scholar]
  45. Silverstein, Michael
    1992 “The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections.” Pragmatics2 (3): 311–323. 10.1075/prag.2.3.11sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.11sil [Google Scholar]
  46. Statistics Canada
    Statistics Canada 2016 “Census program.” 2016 Census of Population. www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/index-eng.cfm
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor, Charles
    1993Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Teo, Peter
    2000 “Racism in the news: A Critical Discourse Analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspaper.” Discourse & Society11(1): 7–49. 10.1177/0957926500011001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002 [Google Scholar]
  49. Todd, Douglas
    2012 Chinese-only sign debate: All Canadians benefit from common language. Vancouver Sun, January 14, 2012. vancouversun.com/news/staff-blogs/why-chinese-only-signs-arent-good-for-canada
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Trumper-Hecht, Nira
    2010 “Linguistic landscape in mixed cities in Israel from the perspective of ‘walkers’: The case of Arabic.” InLinguistic Landscape and the City, edited byElana Shohamy, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni, 235–251. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-015 [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781483326184
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326184 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2008Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Dijk, A. Teun
    2017 Socio-cognitive discourse studies. InRoutledge Handook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byJohn Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 26–43. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vessey, Rachelle
    2016Language and Canadian Media: Representations, Ideologies, Policies. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑53001‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53001-1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vipond, Mary
    2008 “One network or two? French-language programming on the Canadian Radio Broadcasting Commission, 1932–36.” The Canadian Historical Review89 (3): 319–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2012The Mass Media in Canada, 4th Ed.Toronto: James Lorimer and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Woolard, Kathryn A.
    1998 “Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry.” InLanguage Ideologies: Practice and Theory, edited byBambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn. A. Woolard and Paul V. Kroskrity, 3–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18030.ves
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18030.ves
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: language ideology; linguistic landscapes; Canada; Chinese; online comments; English
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error