Weaponizing words

References

1. Abdelzaher, Esra
   2019a “Lexicon-based Detection of Violence on Social Media.” Cognitive Semantics5(1): 32–69. doi:  10.1163/23526416‑00501002
   https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00501002 [Google Scholar]
2. Abdelzaher, Esra
   2019b “The Systematic Adaptation of Violence Contexts in the ISIS Discourse: A Contrastive Corpus Based Study.” 3(2): 173–203. doi:  10.1007/s41701‑019‑00055‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00055-y [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Rikaby, Ali Badeen Mohammed, and Tengku Sepora Tengku Mahadi
   . “The significance of the discursive strategies in al-Baghdadi’s and al-Zawahiri’s hortatory speeches.” Journal of Language and Politics17(6 2018: 769–788. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17048.moh
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17048.moh [Google Scholar]
4. Arosoaie, Aida
   2017 “In the name of honour and freedom: the sacred as a justifying tool for ISIS’and secular violence.” Culture and Religion18(3): 278–295. doi:  10.1080/14755610.2017.1358191
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2017.1358191 [Google Scholar]
5. Atkins, Sue, Michael Rundell, and Hiroaki Sato
   2003 “The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography.” International Journal of Lexicography16(3): 333–357. doi:  10.1093/ijl/16.3.333
   https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.333 [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey
   2018 “A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics23(3): 255–278. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17108.bak [Google Scholar]
7. Clifton, Jonathan
   2017 “Justifying the jihad.” Journal of Language and Politics16(3): 453–470. doi:  10.1075/jlp.15014.cli
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15014.cli [Google Scholar]
8. Essam, Bacem A., Mostafa M. Aref, and Fayrouz Fouad
   2019 “When folkloric geopolitical concerns prompt a conspiratorial ideation: the case of Egyptian tweeters.” Geo Journal84(1): 121–133. doi:  10.1007/s10708‑018‑9854‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9854-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Fillmore, Charles J.
   1975 “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” InAnnual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1, pp.123–131. doi:  10.3765/bls.v1i0.2315
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v1i0.2315 [Google Scholar]
10. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2006 “Frame semantics.” Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings34: 373–400. doi:  10.1515/9783110199901.373
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373 [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, Charles J., and Collin Baker
    2011 “A frames approach to semantic analysis.” InThe Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. pp.313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013 [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam RL Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer, and Abby Wright
    2003 “FrameNet in action: The case of attaching.” International journal of lexicography16(3): 297–332. doi:  10.1093/ijl/16.3.297
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.297 [Google Scholar]
13. Gerges, Fawaz A.
    2009 The far enemy: why Jihad went global. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511817793
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817793 [Google Scholar]
14. Heickerö, Roland
    2014 “Cyber terrorism: Electronic jihad.” Strategic Analysis38(4): 554–565. 10.1080/09700161.2014.918435
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2014.918435 [Google Scholar]
15. Lakhfif, Abdelaziz, and Mohamed Tayeb Laskri
    2016 “A frame-based approach for capturing semantics from Arabic text for text-to-sign language MT.” International Journal of Speech Technology19(2): 203–228. 10.1007/s10772‑015‑9290‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-015-9290-8 [Google Scholar]
16. Maggio, James
    2007 “The presidential rhetoric of terror: The recreation of reality immediately after 9/11.” Politics & Policy35(4): 810–835. 10.1111/j.1747‑1346.2007.00085.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00085.x [Google Scholar]
17. Novenario, Celine Marie I.
    “Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through strategies publicized in Jihadist magazines.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism39(11) 2016: 953–967. 10.1080/1057610X.2016.1151679
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1151679 [Google Scholar]
18. Pennebaker, James W.
    2011 “Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict4(2): 92–102. 10.1080/17467586.2011.627932
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2011.627932 [Google Scholar]
19. Petruck, Miriam RL.
    1996 “Frame semantics. Handbook of Pragmatics.” Amsterdam: Benjamins.
20. Pratt, Mary Louise
    . “Harm’s way: Language and the contemporary arts of war.” PMLA124(5) 2009: 1515–1531. 10.1632/pmla.2009.124.5.1515
    https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.5.1515 [Google Scholar]
21. Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Myriam Schwarzer-Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, and Jan Scheffczyk
    2006 “FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice.” Berkeley Online Library.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Schröter, Melani
    . “Addressee orientation in political speeches: Tracing the dialogical ‘other’in argumentative monologue.” Journal of Language and Politics13(2) 2014: 289–312. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.05sch [Google Scholar]
23. Schubert, Christoph
    2014 “Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies: Presidential rhetoric in the USA.” Journal of Language and Politics13(2): 313–335. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.06sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.06sch [Google Scholar]
24. Siegel, Alexandra A., and Joshua A. Tucker
    . “The Islamic State’s information warfare.” Journal of Language and Politics17(2) 2018: 258–280. 10.1075/jlp.17005.sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17005.sie [Google Scholar]
25. Sikos, Jennifer, and Sebastian Padó
    2018 “FrameNet’s using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases.” Constructions and Frames10(1): 38–60. doi:  10.1075/cf.00010.sik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00010.sik [Google Scholar]