1887
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper puts forward an argument about the relation between utopian thought and political discourse. It demonstrates how utopias frame normative discourse in general and political discourse in particular. The argument is informed by Kenneth Burke’s theory of the negative command and its place at the basis of all human language. I argue that utopias are necessarily based in the hortatory negative and are, in literary terms, like religious texts in general being ‘words about words’ designed to coordinate “the tribe”. Burke calls such texts ‘logological’. The argument I put forward here points to a rapidly crumbling utopia that has beset much of the world and all of the West since at least the Reagan-Thatcher era in which a new corporatist political economy was given global impetus.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18052.gra
2019-02-19
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor
    1973Negative Dialectics. Ernst B. Ashton (trans.). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Ben
    2002 “A Principle of Hope: Recorded Music, Listening Practices and the Immanence of Utopia.” Geografiska Annaler84 (3–4): 211–227. doi:  10.1111/j.0435‑3684.2002.00125.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2002.00125.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartlett, Tom
    (2012) Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203109373
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109373 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloch, Ernst
    1959/1995 The Principle of HopeVol1. Plaice Stephen, Neville Plaice, Paul Knight. trans.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  5. Burke, Kenneth
    (1935/1984) Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1945/1962) A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1952a “A dramatistic view of the origins of language.” Quarterly Journal of Speech38 (3): 251–264. 10.1080/00335635209381782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635209381782 [Google Scholar]
  8. 1952b “A dramatistic view of the origins of language: Part two.” Quarterly Journal of Speech38 (4): 446–460. 10.1080/00335635209381810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635209381810 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1952c “A dramatistic view of the origins of language: Part three.” Quarterly Journal of Speech39 (1): 79–92. 10.1080/00335635309381837
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635309381837 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1961The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1967Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1985 “Dramatism and logology”. Communication Quarterly33 (2): 89–93. 10.1080/01463378509369584
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378509369584 [Google Scholar]
  13. de Sa, Alexandre Franco
    2012 “From modern utopias to contemporary uchronia.” InMarder, Michale and Patricia Vieira. eds. 2012 Existential utopia: New perspectives on utopian thought. London: Continuum: 46–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fukuyama, Frances
    1992The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garforth, Lisa
    2009 “No intentions? Utopian theory after the future.” Journal for Cultural Research13 (1): 5–27. 10.1080/14797580802674787
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14797580802674787 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goody, Jack
    1977The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham, Philip
    2001 “Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in the creation of a new political economy.” Discourse and Society12 (6): 761–788. 10.1177/0957926501012006003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006003 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2006Hypercapitalism: New media, language, and social perceptions of value. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 “Halliday and Lemke: A comparison of contextual potentials for two metafunctional systems.” Critical Discourse Studies13 (5): 548–567. 10.1080/17405904.2016.1213177
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1213177 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2017Strategic communication, corporatism, and eternal crisis: The Creel century. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781315206035
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206035 [Google Scholar]
  21. . in press. Neoliberalism, Globalisation and Militarism. InTaylor, Brian and Hamilton Bean eds. in press. ICA Handbook of Communication and Security. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Graham, Philip and Alan Luke
    2003 “Militarising the Body Politic: New media as weapons of mass instruction.” Body and Society9 (4): 149–168. 10.1177/135703403773684702
    https://doi.org/10.1177/135703403773684702 [Google Scholar]
  23. Havelock, E. A.
    1978The Greek concept of justice: From its shadow in Homer to its substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674183513
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674183513 [Google Scholar]
  24. Herzler, Joyce O.
    1923The history of utopian thought. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kellner, Douglas and Harry O’Hara
    1976 “Utopia and Marxism in Ernst Bloch.” New German Critique (9): 11–34. 10.2307/487686
    https://doi.org/10.2307/487686 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lemke, Jay L.
    1998 “Resources for Attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics.” Functions of Language5 (1): 33–56. 10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem [Google Scholar]
  27. Levitas, Ruth
    2009 ‘The imaginary reconstitution of society: Utopia as method’. InTom Moylan and Raffaela Baccolini. eds.Utopia, method, vision: The use value of social dreaming. Bern: Peter Lang: 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2011The concept of utopia. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2013Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. London: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1057/9781137314253
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314253 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mannhein, Kurt
    1954Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Manuel, Frank E.
    1965 ‘Introduction’. InFrank E. Manuel. Utopias and utopian thought: A timely appraisal. New York, NY: Beacon Press. vii–xxi.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, James Robert
    2004 “Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change.” Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49 [Special Issue onDiscourse Analysis at Work: Recent Perspectives in the Study of Language and Social Practice]: 179–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McKenna, Bernard and Philip Graham
    2000 “Technocratic discourse: A primer.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication30 (3): 219–247. 10.2190/56FY‑V5TH‑2U3U‑MHQK
    https://doi.org/10.2190/56FY-V5TH-2U3U-MHQK [Google Scholar]
  34. More, Thomas
    1516/1901Utopia. Henry Morley. ed.Gilbert Burnet. trans.London: Cassell and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mumford, Lewis
    1922/2008The story of utopias. Charleston, SC: BiblioBazaar.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Muntigl, Peter
    2000 Dilemmas of individualism and social necessity. InPeter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, & Ruth Wodak. eds.European Union Discourses on Unemployment: An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change. London: Benjamins. 10.1075/dowi.12.07mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dowi.12.07mun [Google Scholar]
  37. Nancy, J.
    2012 In place of utopia. InMarder, M. and VieiraEds. 2012 Existential utopia: New perspectives on utopian thought. London: Continuum: 22–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Noble, David
    1999The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2005Beyond the promised land: The movement and the myth. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nālanda Translation Committee of Tibet
    Nālanda Translation Committee of Tibet 1980The Sūtra of the heart of transcendent knowledge. Nālanda Translation Committee of Tibet. Available online at: https://www.nalandatranslation.org/offerings/notes-on-the-daily-chants/commentaries/the-sutra-of-the-heart-of-transcendent-knowledge/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nordensvard, Johan
    2014 “Dystopia and disutopia: Hope and hopelessness in German pupils’ future narratives.” Journal of Educational Change (15): 443–465. 10.1007/s10833‑014‑9237‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9237-x [Google Scholar]
  42. Propp, Vladimir
    1984Theory and history of folklore. Martin, Adriana and Richard P. Martintrans.Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rogers, Rebecca and Wetzel, Melissa M.
    2013 “Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies10 (1): 62–92. 10.1080/15427587.2013.753845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2013.753845 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sargisson, Lucy
    2012Fool’s gold? Utopianism in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Veblen, Thorstein
    1914The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. New York, NY. B. W. Heubsch.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wells, Herbert George
    (1905) A modern Utopia. London: Thomas Wells and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
    2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” InRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, eds.Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. 1–33.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18052.gra
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Burke , dramatistic analysis , Negative Discourse Analysis , political discourse and utopia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error