1887
image of Reconciliation as a political discourse in Thailand’s current conflicts
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Why do Thai governments fail in maintaining peace through conducting a reconciliation process? This article answers this question through an assessment of how the term reconciliation has been defined and used by the Thai governments and political leaders during the past decades. This article finds that the political conflicts in Thailand have never been solved because several times, reconciliation in the Thai language is a term that has been dynamically interpreted and applied by leaders of the conflicting groups as a means to defeat the people of the opposing groups rather that a means of resolving problems and reconciling society.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18054.tha
2019-07-31
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. “ขิงแก่” ฝ่อ! รับ “แม้ว” ทรงอิทธิพล-สมานฉันท์เหลว 2007 Manager Online, March, 9. Retrieved17-02-2017fromwww2.manager.co.th/Politics/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9510000007838
  2. “สุรยุทธ์” ลั่น “ในชีวิตไม่เคยถอดใจ”- ยันนำพาชาติฝ่าพ้นวิกฤตให้ได้ 2007 Manager Online, January, 20. Retrieved17-02-2017fromwww.manager.co.th/Local/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9500000028081
  3. “Call to Amend Charter” 2008The Nation, 22March, 1A.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. “Charter is not a political toy” 2008Bangkok Post, 25March, 10.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. “Reuters Journalist Killed in Bangkok Protests” 2010Reuters, April4. Retrieved15-12-2016fromwww.reuters.com/article/2010/04/10/us-thailand-protests-reuters-idUSTRE6391OO20100410
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed
    2001 Conflict Resolution, Culture, and Religion: Toward a Training Model of Interreligious Peacebuilding. Journal of Peace Research38(6), 685–704. doi:  10.1177/0022343301038006003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343301038006003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Azar, Edward E. and John W. Burton
    (eds.) 1986International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bell, Christine, and Kimana Zulueta-Fülscher
    2016Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlement Process. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman
    2009 “Introduction: The Nature of Conflict and Conflict Resolution.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited byBercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 1–11. London: Sage. 10.4135/9780857024701.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024701.n1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloomfield, David, and Ben Reilly
    1998 “The Changing Nature of Conflict and Conflict Management.” InDemocracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited byPeter Harris and Ben Reilly, 9–28. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloomfield, David
    2003 “Reconciliation: an Introduction.” InReconciliation after Violent Conflict: A Handbook, edited byBloomfield, David, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, 10–18. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brounéus, Karen
    2003Reconciliation: Theory and Practice for Development Cooperation. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Burton, John
    1990Conflict: Resolution & Prevention. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chairat Charoensin-o-larn
    2010 Thailand in 2009: Unusual Politics Becomes Usual. Southeast Asian Affairs: 302–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 Thailand in 2012: A Year of Truth, Reconciliation, and Continued Divide. Southeast Asian Affairs: 285–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaiyan Ratchakul
    2002 Conflicts in the Context of Peaceful Means. InClass Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 2). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischer, M.
    2011 “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice.” InAdvancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited byBeatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 406–430. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Galtung, Johan
    1976 “Three Approaches to Peace: Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peacebuilding.” InPeace, War and Defense: Essays in Peace Research, Vol.II, edited byJohan Galtung, 282–304. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1996Peace by Peaceful Means. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2001 “After Violence, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, and Resolution: Coping with Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence.” InReconciliation, Justice, and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, edited byMohammed Abu-Nimer, 3–24. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hewison, Kevin
    2014 Thailand: The Lessons of Protest. Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia50(1): 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015 Thailand: Contestation over Elections, Sovereignty and Representation. Representation50(1): 51–62. doi:  10.1080/00344893.2015.1011459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1011459 [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Kai-Ping, and Stithorn Thananithichot
    2018 Social Divisions, Party Support, and the Changes in the Thai Party System since 2001. International Area Studies Review, 21(3): 214–230. doi:  10.1177/2233865918776849
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865918776849 [Google Scholar]
  24. Huyse, Luc
    1998 “Transitional Justice.” InDemocracy and Deep-Rooted Conflict: Options for Negotiators, edited byPeter Harris and Ben Reilly, 273–280. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. King Prajadhipok’s Institute
    King Prajadhipok’s Institute 2012The National Reconciliation Building. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute. [in Thai]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kriesberg, Louis
    2011 “The State of the Art in Conflict Transformation.” InAdvancing Conflict Transformation: The Berghof Handbook II, edited byBeatrix Austin, Martina Fischer, and Hans J. Giessmann, 49–73. London: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lederach, John Paul
    1995Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1999Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McClung, Margi, and Karina Kloos
    2016Promoting Peace: Mitigating and Managing Intra-Household Property Rights Disputes in Rwanda. Seattle, WA: United States Agency for International Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Miall, Hugh
    2004Conflict Transformation: A Multi-Dimensional Task. Berlin: Berghof Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nishizaki, Yoshinori
    2014 Peasants and the Redshirt Movement in Thailand: Some Dissenting Voice. The Journal of Peasant Studies41(1): 1–28. doi:  10.1080/03066150.2013.873409
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.873409 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ockey, James
    2009 Thailand in 2008: Democracy and Street Politics. Southeast Asian Affairs: 315–333. 10.1355/SEAA09Q
    https://doi.org/10.1355/SEAA09Q [Google Scholar]
  34. Pickering, Peg
    2000 How to Manage Conflict: Turn All Conflicts into Win-win Outcomes, 3rd edition. Franklin Lake, NJ: Career Press.
  35. Pye, Oliver, and Wolfram Schaffar
    2008 The 2006 Anti-Thaksin Movement in Thailand: An Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia38(1): 8–61. doi:  10.1080/00472330701651945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651945 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rosoux, Valerie
    2009 “Reconciliation as a Peace-Building Process: Scope and Limits.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited byBercovitch, Jacob, Victor Kremenyuk, and William I. Zartman, 543–562. London: Sage. 10.4135/9780857024701.n29
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024701.n29 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rungtham Sujithammarak
    Rungtham Sujithammarak 2002 Peace Studies and Peace. Class Materials of Peace Studies and Peace Subject (Chapter 1). Nonthaburi, Thailand: Sukhothai Thammatirat Open University. [in Thai]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shriver, Donald. W.
    1995An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Spangler, Brad
    2003 “Settlement, Resolution, Management, and Transformation: An Explanation of Terms.” InBeyond Intractability, edited byGuy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Boulder, Colorado: Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Staub, Ervin
    2000 “Genocide and Mass Killing: Origins, Prevention, Healing and Reconciliation.” Political Psychology21(2): 367–82. doi:  10.1111/0162‑895X.00193
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00193 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stephenson, Carolyn M.
    2008 “Peace Studies, Overview.” InEncyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict, Volume 2, edited byLester Kurtz, 809–820. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑012373985‑8.00130‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373985-8.00130-6 [Google Scholar]
  42. Suravich Weerawan
    2007 ตัวตนของพล.อ.สุรยุทธ์. Manager Online, March, 23. Retrieved17-02-2017fromwww.thaiday.com/Daily/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9500000033429
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Taylor, David
    2014 Victim Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms: Real Power or Empty Ritual?Discussion Paper. Impunity Watch, Utrecht.
  44. “Thailand: Revolution in Red and Yellow” 2009The Guardian, April14. Retrieved11-12-2016fromwww.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/14/leader-thailand-political-crisis
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Thoms, Oskar N. T., James Ron and Roland Paris
    2008The Effects of Transitional Justice Mechanisms: A Summary of Empirical Research Findings and Implications for Analysts and Practitioners. Ottawa: Centre for International Policy Studies, University of Ottawa.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. “The Week in Review” 2006Bangkok Post, October1, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Thailand
    Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Thailand 2012Final Report of Truth for Reconciliation Commission of Thailand (TRCT) July 2010 – July 2012. Bangkok: Office of Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Thailand.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Weiner, Eugene
    1998 “Coexistence Work: A New Profession.” InThe Handbook of Interethnic Coexistence, edited byEugene Weiner, 13–26. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18054.tha
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: political conflict; discourse; reconciliation; Thailand
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error