Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



On August 25, 2017, student members of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a right-wing conservative organization who advocates for smaller government and free market enterprise, recruited on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) campus. Members of the UNL community protested nearby. Part of the protest was recorded on video and released to social media leading to harsh public criticism that accused the university of restricting free speech and being an unsafe environment for conservative students. Drawing on cognitive linguistics (e.g. metonymy, framing) and multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA), this paper explores how the TPUSA incident at UNL was recontextualized in local and national media discourse, the ways in which the social actors and events were framed, and its consequences. The authors show how these representations reinforce dominant neoliberal discourses (which correlate with right-wing discourses) that negatively impact public education, providing a necessary counter to a populist political climate in which anti-intellectualism reigns.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barthes, Roland
    1977Elements of Semiology. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, Basil
    2003Class, Codes, and Control: Volume VI the Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Catalano, Theresa
    2016Talking about Global Migration: Implications for Language Teaching. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095551
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095551 [Google Scholar]
  4. Catalano, Theresa, and Linda R. Waugh
    . Forthcoming 2019Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chandler, Daniel
    2007Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203014936
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014936 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2014Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric: Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Claussen, D. S.
    2011 A brief history of anti-intellectualism in American media. Academe, 97(3), 8–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens
    eds. 2007The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: OUP USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harvey, David
    2007A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Iyengar, Shanto
    1994Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kolowich, Steve
    . April27 2018 “State of Conflict: How a Tiny Protest at the U. of Nebraska Turned into a Proxy War for the Future of Campus Politics,” The Chronicle of Higher Education. RetrievedJune 1, 2018from: https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/state-of-conflict
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Joshua A. Tucker
    2018 “Re-/Constructing Politics through Social and Online Media: Ideologies, Discourses and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (2): 141–154. 10.1075/jlp.18007.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18007.krz [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, George
    2004Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ledin, Per, and David Machin
    2018Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Liptak, Adam
    . June30 2018 “How Conservatives Weaponized the First Amendment,” The New York Times. RetrievedJune 1, 2018from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/30/us/politics/first-amendment-conservatives-supreme-court.html
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2015Metonymy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
  18. Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
    2012How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McCausland, Phil, and Emmanuelle Saliba, E.
    August12 2017 “Charlottesville Rally Turns Deadly: One Killed After Car Strikes Crowd,” NBC News. RetrievedJune 1, 2018from: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/charlottesville-rally-turns-deadly-one-killed-after-car-strikes-crowd-n792116
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Messer-Davidow, Ellen
    1993 “Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education.” Social Text36: 40–80. 10.2307/466388
    https://doi.org/10.2307/466388 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mindock, Clark
    . May24 2018 “Taking a Knee: Why are NFL Players Protesting and When Did They Start to Kneel?” The Independent. RetrievedJune 1, 2018from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/taking-a-knee-national-anthem-nfl-trump-why-meaning-origins-racism-us-colin-kaepernick-a8521741.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ötsch, Walter O., and Stephan Pühringer
    2017 “Right-Wing Populism and Market- Fundamentalism.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 497–509. 10.1075/jlp.17027.ots
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17027.ots [Google Scholar]
  23. Saunders, Daniel B.
    2010 “Neoliberal Ideology and Public Higher Education in the United States.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies8 (1): 41–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tiede, Hans Joerg
    2017 “Exhuming McCarthy (Meet Me at the Book Burning)” Academe, 103 (5): 15–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. U.S. Const. Amend. I
  26. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1991Racism and the Press. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1995 “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and Society, 6 (2): 243–289. 10.1177/0957926595006002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006 [Google Scholar]
  28. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    2016 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse- Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies1(1): 83–118. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Waugh, Linda R., Theresa Catalano, Khaled Al Masaeed, Tom Hong Do, and Paul G. Renigar
    2016 “Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends.” InInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Societyed. byAlessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 71–135. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyżanowski
    2017 “Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse Beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 1–14. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
  32. Wodak, Ruth
    . “The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”.” Journal of Language and Politics16, no.4 (2017): 551–565. 10.1075/jlp.17030.wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17030.wod [Google Scholar]
  33. 2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error