Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this article I start from an understanding of songs as socio-cultural discourses which may also perform a political function. This political function can be reflected in the promotion of particular world-views about given socio-political events and/or in the attempt by the singer to make the audience perform given political actions. To prove this, I will look at the re-contextualisation process undergone by a well-known song by U2: “Sunday, Bloody Sunday” (1983). This song was originally written to respond to the violence of the Northern Irish conflict, but it has been later used to react to other socio-political events. By relying on a cognitive approach to the study of songs, this paper tries to answer two questions: (i) how can we explain the re-contextualisation process undergone by the song and why is it possible? and (ii) how is politics embedded in musical performances?


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bar-Tal, Daniel; Ariel W. Kruglanski, and Yechiel Klar
    1989 “Conflict Termination: An Epistemological Analysis of International Cases.” Political Psychology10 (2): 233–255. 10.2307/3791646
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3791646 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benito García, Iván
    2013One Love… U2. Análisis de la Banda de Rock U2. Madrid: U2fanlife.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bew, Paul, and Gordon Gillespie
    1999Northern Ireland. A Chronology of the Troubles. 1968–1999. Dublin: Gill & MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordowitz, Frank
    (ed) 2003The U2 Reader. A Quarter Century of Commentary, Criticism, and Reviews. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bull, William E.
    1960Time, Tense and the Verb: A Study in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, with Particular Attention to Spanish. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cap, Piotr
    2010 “Proximizing Objects, Proximizing Values. Towards an Axiological Contribution to the Discourse of Legitimisation.” InPerspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. byUrszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 119–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.36.11cap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.36.11cap [Google Scholar]
  7. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2005 “Vectors, Viewpoint and Viewpoint Shift. Toward a Discourse Space Theory.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics3: 78–116. 10.1075/arcl.3.06chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.06chi [Google Scholar]
  9. CNN
    CNN. “September 11, 2001: Background and timeline of the attacks,” CNN News, September8 2016edition.cnn.com/2013/07/27/us/september-11-anniversary-fast-facts/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison
    1998Music and Social Movements. Mobilizing Traditions in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511628139
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628139 [Google Scholar]
  11. Filardo-Llamas, Laura
    2015 “Re-contextualizing Political Discourse: An Analysis of Shifting Spaces in Songs Used as a Political Tool.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (3): 279–296. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1013478
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013478 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gavins, Joanna
    2007Text World Theory. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M. A. K.
    2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised byChristian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold. 3rd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hart, Christopher
    2014Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hennessey, Thomas
    1997A History of Northern Ireland. 1920–1996. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑26066‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26066-9 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jobling, John
    2014U2. The Definitive Biography. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, Rodney H.
    2010 Creativity and discourse, World Englishes29 (4): 467–480. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2010.01675.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01675.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Kootnikoff, David
    2010U2. A Musical Biography. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Langacker, Ronald
    1991Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lugea, Jane
    2016World Building in Spanish and English Spoken Narratives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Machin, David
    2010Analysing Popular Music: Image, Sound and Text. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446280027
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280027 [Google Scholar]
  24. Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
    2012How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marvilli, Joe
    2009 “Rock History 101: U2’s “Sunday Bloody Sunday”,” Consequence of Sound, November7 2009 consequenceofsound.net/2009/11/rock-history-101-u2s-sunday-bloody-sunday/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McKittrick, David, and David McVea
    2001Making Sense of the Troubles. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Melnick, Jeffrey
    20099/11 Culture. America under Construction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Neufeld, Timothy D.
    2017U2: Rock ‘n’ Roll to Change the World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peddie, Ian
    (ed.) 2011Popular Music and Human Rights. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pietzonka, Katrin
    2008 “List of Songs about ‘The Troubles’,” CAIN. A Conflict Archive on the Internet. cain.ulst.ac.uk/bibdbs/music/kp08songlist.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Quay, Sara E., and Amy M. Damico
    (eds) 2010September 11 in Popular Culture. A Guide. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shuker, Roy
    1995Understanding Popular Music. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Street, John
    1986Rebel Rock. The Politics of Popular Music. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shepherd, John, David Horn, Dave Laing, Paul Oliver, and Peter Wicke
    (eds.) 2003 Continuum Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World. Volume1. Media, Industry and Society. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Talmy, Leonard
    2018The Targeting System of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036979.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Trost, Theodore Louis
    2015 “Transgressive Theology: The Sacred and The Profane at U2’s PopMart.” InU2 Above, Across and Beyond. Interdisciplinary Assessments, ed. byScott Calhoun, 91–104. Lanham: Lexinton Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vagacs, Robert
    2005U2. Religious Nuts, Political Fanatics: U2 in Theological Perspective. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” InPolitical Linguistics, ed. byJan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2008Context. A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2012 “The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (4): 319–328. 10.1080/17405904.2012.713204
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.713204 [Google Scholar]
  41. Way, Lyndon C. S., and Simon McKerrell
    2017Music as Multimodal Discourse: Semiotics, Power and Protest. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Way, Lyndon C. S.
    2018Popular Music and Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies: Ideology, Control and Resistance in Turkey since 2002. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350016477
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350016477 [Google Scholar]
  43. Werth, Paul
    1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, Michael
    2014 “Politics as Spectacle: U2’s 360º tour (2009–2011).” InPower, Politics and International Events: Sociocultural Analysis of Festivals and Spectacles, ed. byUdo Merkel, 174–190. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wodak, Ruth, and Norman Fairclough
    2010 “Recontextualizing European Higher Education Policies: The Cases of Austria and Romania.” Critical Discourse Studies7 (1): 19–40. 10.1080/17405900903453922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453922 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
    1999The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zbikowski, Lawrence M.
    2002Conceptualizing Music. Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140231.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140231.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2015 “Words, Music, and Meaning,” Signata6: 143–164. signata.revues.org/1071
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2017Foundations of Musical Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190653637.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190653637.001.0001 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): constructivism; discourse space theory; musical performance; songs; text-world theory; U2
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error