1887
image of Creating the conditions for human division and structural inequality
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While Singapore’s education system claims to implement meritocratic ideals, official statistics indicate that Malay students in Singapore have been underperforming when compared to other ethnic groups (MOE 2012). This statistical representation raises the possibility of a politically induced, systemic inequality as a point of investigation. To investigate this seeming contradiction between the rhetoric and practice of equal educational opportunity, this paper proposes a philosophical and analytical synthesis for examining the 1979 policy report that provides the fundamental basis for Singapore’s streaming education system. In examining this policy development, the analysis draws upon a combination of Foucault’s archaeological method and Critical Discourse Analysis as a way of understanding conditions that made possible the continuous re-construction of new but unequal representation of learners. The findings suggest that complex relations between capability identification, justice, and ethics set the conditions for the appearance and transformation of subject positions necessary to legitimise unequal structural access.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18070.tal
2019-06-25
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barr, Michael D. and Zlatko Skrbiš
    2008Constructing Singapore: elitism, ethnicity and the nation-building project. Copenhagen: NIAS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bohm, David
    1994Thought as a system. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    2013On anarchism. New York: New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2001Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Feder, Ellen K.
    2011 “Power/knowledge.” InMichel Foucault: key concepts, edited byDianna Taylor, 55–68. Durham: Acumen.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fairclough, Norman, Philip Graham, Jay Lemke, and Ruth Wodak
    2004 “Introduction.” Critical Discourse Studies1 (1): 1–6. doi:  10.1080/17405900410001674489
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674489 [Google Scholar]
  8. Foucault, Michel
    1972The archaeology of knowledge; and The discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1982 “The subject and power.” Critical Inquiry8 (4): 777–795. www.jstor.org/stable/1343197
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1984Foucault. Available online at: foucault.info/foucault/biography.html
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1991 “Politics and the study of discourse.” InThe Foucault effect: studies in governmentality: with two lectures and an interview with Michel Foucault, edited byGraham Burchell, Collin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 53–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M.
    2002Archaeology of knowledge. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. General information
  14. Gopinathan, Saravanan
    1996 “Globalisation, the State and education policy in Singapore.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education16 (1): 74–87. doi:  10.1080/02188799608542612
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02188799608542612 [Google Scholar]
  15. Graham, Linda J.
    2011 “The product of text and ‘Other’ statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault.” Educational Philosophy and Theory43 (6): 663–674. doi:  10.1111/j.1469‑5812.2010.00698.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00698.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamilton, Mary and Kathy Pitt
    2011 “Changing policy discourses: Constructing literacy inequalities.” International Journal of Educational Development31 (6): 596–605. doi:  10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2016 “Recontextualisations of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse and Society27 (3): 308–321. doi:  10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  18. Krzyżanowski, Michal and Ruth Wodak
    2011 “Political strategies and language policies: The ‘rise and fall’ of the EU Lisbon strategy and its implications for the union’s multilingualism policy.” Language Policy10 (2): 115–136. doi:  10.1007/s10993‑011‑9196‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5 [Google Scholar]
  19. Marshall, James D.
    1996Michel Foucault: Personal autonomy and education. London: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8662‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8662-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mckee, Kim
    2009 “Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?” Critical Social Policy29 (3): 465–486. doi:  10.1177/0261018309105180
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180 [Google Scholar]
  21. Medina, José and David Wood
    2005 “General Introduction.” InTruth: Engagements across philosophical traditions, edited byMedina, José and David Wood, 1–6. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470776407.part1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776407.part1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 1979Report on the Ministry of Education 1978, prepared by Goh Keng Swee and the Education Study Team. Singapore: Singapore National Printers.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 1997Performance by ethnic group. AccessedJuly 15, 2013. www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/1997/pr02397.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2012Press Release: Performance by ethnic group in national examinations 2002–2011. AccessedJuly 15, 2013. www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2012/10/performance-by-ethnic-group-in.php
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Normal course curriculum
    Normal course curriculum. n.d.AccessedJuly 15, 2013. www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/normal/
  26. Ng, Eng Hen
    2008Educating the next generation. Speech by Dr Ng Eng Hen, Minister for Education and Second Minister for Defence, at the 4th Anniversary Public Lecture at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, 14 August. AccessedMay 15, 2018. www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20080814992.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ong, Ye Kung
    2018MOE FY2018 Committee of Supply Debate Response by Minister for Education (Higher Education and Skills) on 5 March 2018. AccessedJan 15, 2019. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/moe-fy2018-committee-of-supply-debate-response-by-minister-for-education-higher-education-and-skills--mr-ong-ye-kung
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2018Opening address by Mr Ong Ye Kung, Minister for Education, at the Schools Work Plan Seminar on 28 September 2018. AccessedJan 15, 2019. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/opening-address-by-mr-ong-ye-kung--minister-for-education--at-the-schools-work-plan-seminar
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peters, S.J.
    (2007) “‘Education for all?’ A historical analysis of international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities”. Journal of Disability Policy Studies18(2): 98–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rahim, Lily Zubaidah
    1998The Singapore dilemma: The political and educational marginality of the Malay community. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rouse, Joseph
    2005 “Power/knowledge.” InThe Cambridge companion to Foucault (2nd ed.), edited byGary Gutting, 95–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL0521840821.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521840821.005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Secondary education
    Secondary education. n.d.Available online at: www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/
  33. Soon, Teck Wong
    1988Singapore’s New Education System. Education reform for national development. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Talib, Nadira
    2016 “Inequality as meritocracy: A critical discourse analysis of the metaphors of flexibility, diversity, and choice, and the value of truth in Singapore’s education policies, 1979 to 2012.” PhD diss., The University of Queensland.
  35. Talib, Nadira and Richard Fitzgerald
    2015 “Inequality as meritocracy. The use of the metaphor of diversity and the value of inequality within Singapore’s meritocratic education system.” Critical Discourse Studies12 (4): 445–462. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2015.1034740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1034740 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2016 “Micro-meso-macro movements; A multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts.” Critical Discourse Studies13 (5): 531–547. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2018 “Putting philosophy back to work in critical discourse analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies15 (2): 123–139. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2017.1421242
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1421242 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tan, Kenneth Paul
    2008 “Meritocracy and elitism in a Global City: Ideological shifts in Singapore.” International Political Science Review29 (1): 7–27. doi:  10.1177/0192512107083445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107083445 [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, Sandra
    2004 “Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: using critical discourse analysis.” Journal of Education Policy19 (4): 433–451. doi:  10.1080/0268093042000227483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227483 [Google Scholar]
  40. Trew, Tony
    1979 “ ‘What the papers say’: linguistic variation and ideological difference.” InLanguage and control, edited byRoger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 117–156. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. van Dijk, Teun Adrianus
    1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse and Society4 (2): 249–283. doi:  10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  42. Walshaw, Margaret
    2007Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wong, Aline
    2000Keynote address by Dr Aline Wong, Senior Minister of State for Education, Ministry of Education, Singapore, at the International Baccalaureate (IB) Asia-Pacific 16th annual regional conference on curriculum, assessment and cultural equity to be held on Friday, 24 November 2000, at 9.15 am at the Raffles City Convention Centre: Education in a multicultural setting–The Singapore experience. AccessedJan 15, 2019. www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/view-html?filename=2000112401.htm
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.18070.tal
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error