1887
Volume 19, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees occupies a position outside the official legislative system of the United Kingdom, but inside a lobbying network. This gives it a unique place in terms of communicating on behalf of refugees and refugee causes. The Group’s Twitter feed shows that its language is different to that of campaigning organisations outside Parliament and is constrained by procedure, parliamentary practice and the political reality of a party-based environment. Aimed at Parliamentarians, the feed is used to support and promote causes and specific policy proposals. It plays a role in reporting what is going on in Parliament and supports and builds alliances with other organisations inside and outside the system. The feed’s content follows the primary information-providing objective. It could however make that information of more use to recipients, by changing the way in which some of that information is presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19002.kea
2020-04-03
2020-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees
    All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees 2017 “Refugees Welcome? The Experience of New Refugees in the UK.” https://naccom.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/APPG_on_Refugees_-_Refugees_Welcome_report.pdf
  2. Cebrián Guinovart, Elena, Tamara Vásquez Barrio and David Saria Rodríguez
    2016 “Is Twitter Invigorating Spanish Democracy? A Study of Political Interaction through the Accounts of The Prime Minister and The Leader of the Main Opposition Party”. InCitizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital World, edited byFrame, Alex and Gilles Brachotte, 60–80, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colvin, Scott
    2011How to Use Politicians to Get What You Want. London: Biteback.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dale, Robert
    2015How to be a Parliamentary Researcher. London: Biteback.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Fraia, Guido, and Maria Carlotta Missaglia
    2016 “Two Step Flow Twitter Communication in 2013 Italian Political Election. A Missed Opportunity for Citizen Participation.” InCitizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital World, edited byFrame, Alex and Gilles Brachotte, 25–41. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Einspänner-Pflock, Jessica, Mario Anastasiadis and Caja Thimm
    2016 “Ad Hoc Mini-Publics on Twitter. Citizen Participation or Political Communication? Examples from the German National Election 2013.” InCitizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital World, edited byFrame, Alex and Gilles Brachotte, 42–59. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallagher, Paul
    2014 “Corporate funding of all party groups ‘next big scandal’ after huge rise under the coalition.” The Independent, 18May. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corporate-funding-of-all-party-groups-next-big-scandal-after-huge-rise-under-the-coalition-9391286.html
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Grant, Wyn
    2018Lobbying: The Dark side of Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. House of Commons Hansard
  10. House of Commons Speaker’s Working Group on All-Party Groups
    House of Commons Speaker’s Working Group on All-Party Groups 2012 “Report to the Speaker and Lord Speaker.” https://www.parliament.uk/documents/speaker/Speakers-Working-Group-on-APGs-report.pdf
  11. Houses of Parliament
  12. House of Commons Committee on Standards
    House of Commons Committee on Standards 2013All Party Parliamentary Groups. Sixth report of session 2013–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants
    Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants. n.d. “About Us” Accessed18 September 2018https://www.jcwi.org.uk
  14. Leston-Bandeira, Cristina, and Louise Thompson
    (Eds) 2018Exploring Parliament, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/hepl/9780198788430.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198788430.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. McLaren, Lauren, Hajo Boomgaarden, and Rens Vliegenthart
    2018 “News Coverage and Public Concern about Immigration in Britain.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30, no.2: 173–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Moon, Jung Soo, and Patrick Hadley
    2014 “Routinising a New Technology in the Newsroom: Twitter as a News Source in Mainstream Media.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 58, no.2: 289–305. 10.1080/08838151.2014.906435
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906435 [Google Scholar]
  17. Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards
    Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 2017 “Guide to the Rules on All Party Parliamentary Groups.” https://www.parliament.uk/documents/pcfs/all-party-groups/guide-to-rules/guide.html#_idTextAnchor000
  18. Refugee Council
    Refugee Council. n.d. “www.refugeecouncil.org.uk
  19. Rogers, Robert, and Rhodri Walters
    2015How Parliament Works. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315730875
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730875 [Google Scholar]
  20. Searing, Donald D.
    1994Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Small, Tamara A.
    2012 “What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter.”’ InSocial Media and Democracy: Innovations in Participatory Politics, edited byLoader and Mercea, 109–129. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas, Paul E. J.
    2016 Across Enemy Lines: A Study of the All-Party Groups in the Parliaments of Canada, Ontario, Scotland and the United Kingdom. PhD thesis. University of Toronto.
  23. Thomas, Paul E. J., and Stacey Frier
    2018 “Campaigning to Change Law and Policy.” InExploring Parliament, edited byLeston-Banderia and Thompson, 111–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/hepl/9780198788430.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198788430.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Thomson, Stuart
    (Ed) 2016Public Affairs: A Global Perspective. Chatham, Kent: Urbane Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wagner, Angelia
    2016 “Candidate Orientation to ICTs in Canadian Municipal Elections.” InCitizen Participation and Political Communication in a Digital World, edited byFrame and Brachotte, 81–94. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Walgrave, Stefaan and Yves Dejaeghere
    2016 “Surviving Information Overload: How Elite Politicians Select Information.” Governance, 30, no.2: 229–244. 10.1111/gove.12209
    https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12209 [Google Scholar]
  27. White, Alison J.
    2018 APPG Letter, Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists. registrarofconsultantlobbyists.org.uk/guidance/specialist-guidance/all-party-parliamentary-groups/
  28. Zetter, Lionel
    2014Lobbying: The Art of Political Persuasion. Petersfield, Hants: Harriman House.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19002.kea
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): lobbying , MPs , Parliament , refugees , Twitter and United Kingdom
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error