1887
Volume 18, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Migration has been a defining topic in the discourse in Germany since the so-called “refugee crisis” in 2015. This corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis systematically reconstructs the discourse about migration in two influential German newspapers, thereby emphasizing the construction of different subject positions for people migrating to Germany. Mass media are an important arena for the fight for hegemony between discursive coalitions of culturalization regimes that are based on openness and closure respectively. The discursive space of the German discourse about migration offers multiple opportunities in this regard. In the left-leaning , we detect a general trend to support an open society although some (but often contested) elements of closure are detected in this medium as well. leans much more towards closure and the problematization of migration although it also offers a diverse array of interpellations that depend on the usefulness or threating character of people coming to Germany.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19006.gri
2019-08-02
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Althusser, Louis
    2014On Ideology. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Avramopoulos, Dimitris
    2015 “Flüchtline umverteilen [Redistribute refugees].“ Die Welt (15.05.2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul
    2004 “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics32 (4): 346–359. doi:  10.1177/0075424204269894
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269894 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. doi:  10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bannerji, Himani
    2000The Dark Side of the Nation: Essays on Multiculturalism, Nationalism, and Gender. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bax, Daniel
    2016 “untitled.“ taz (09.01.2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker, Maria
    2016 “Die Flüchtlingsdebatte in den Medien Deutschlands. Eine korpus- und diskurslinguistische Untersuchung der Konzeptualisierung von Angst [The refugee debate in the German media. A corpus and discourse linguistic analysis of the conceptualization of fear].” IDS Sprachreport (2/2016). https://ids-pub.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/4967. Accessed22.05.2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bojadžijev, Manuela
    2018 “Migration as Social Seismograph: an Analysis of Germany’s ‘Refugee Crisis’ Controversy.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society31 (4): 335–356. doi:  10.1007/s10767‑018‑9286‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-018-9286-x [Google Scholar]
  9. Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Myria Georgiou
    2017 “Hospitability: The Communicative Architecture of Humanitarian Securitization at Europe’s Borders.” Journal of Communication67 (2): 159–180. doi:  10.1111/jcom.12291
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12291 [Google Scholar]
  10. Evert, Stefan
    2009 “Corpora and Collocations.” InCorpus Linguistics. An International Handbook (Band 2), edited byAnke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö, 1212–1248. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fauth, Lea
    2015 “Antifaschismus. Kein Recht auf Nazipropaganda!“ [Anti-facism. No right to Nazi propaganda!].” taz (29.10.2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fotopoulos, Stergios, and Margarita Kaimaklioti
    2016 “Media Discourse on the Refugee Crisis. On What Have the Greek, German and British Press Focused?” European View15 (2): 265–279. doi:  10.1007/s12290‑016‑0407‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0407-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Georgiou, Myria, and Rafal Zaborowski
    2017 “Media Coverage of the ‘Refugee Crisis’: A Cross-European Perspective.” https://rm.coe.int/1680706b00 (date accessed: 12.05.2019).
  14. Gerring, John
    2007Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hajer, Maarten
    2006 “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” InWords Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, edited byMargo van den Brink and Tamara Metze, 65–76. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, Stuart
    1996 “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” InQuestions of Cultural Identity, edited byStuart Hall and Paul Du Gay, 1–17. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1982 “The Rediscovery of ‘Ideology’; Return of the Repressed in Media Studies.” InCulture, Society and the Media, edited byMichael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran and Janet Wollacott, 56–90. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hardie, Andrew
    2012 “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17 (3): 380–409. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har [Google Scholar]
  19. Holmes, Seth M., and Heide Castañeda
    2016 “Representing the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Germany and Beyond. Deservingness and Difference, Life and Death.” American Ethnologist43 (1):12–24. doi:  10.1111/amet.12259
    https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12259 [Google Scholar]
  20. Holzberg, Billy, Kristina Kolbe, and Rafal Zaborowski
    2018 “Figures of Crisis: The Delineation of (Un)Deserving Refugees in the German Media.” Sociology52 (3): 534–550. doi:  10.1177/0038038518759460
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518759460 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hübsch, Khola Maryam
    2016 “In der Debatte über Köln trüben antimuslimische Ressentiments den Blick auf ein globales Problem. [In the debate about Cologne, anti-muslim ressentiments blur the focus on a global problem]” taz (09.01.2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huysmans, Jef
    2000 “The European Union and the Securitization of Migration.” Journal of Common Market Studies38 (5): 751–777. doi:  10.1111/1468‑5965.00263
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jung, Matthias, Thomas Niehr, and Karin Böke
    2000Ausländer und Migranten im Spiegel der Presse: Ein diskurshistorisches Wörterbuch zur Einwanderung seit 1945 [Foreigners and migrants in the mirror of the media: A dicourse historical dictionary on immigration since 1945]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kamann, Matthias
    2016 “Was gegen Terror hilft. [What works against terror]“ Die Welt (11.08.2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Krämer, Benjamin
    2017 “Populist and Non-Populist Media: Their Paradoxical Role in the Development and Diffusion of a Rightwing Ideology.” InPolitical Populism: A Handbook, edited byReinhard C. Heinisch, Christina Holtz-Bacha and Oscar Mazzoleni, 405–420. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 10.5771/9783845271491‑405
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845271491-405 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krzyżanowski, Michał and Ruth Wodak
    2009The Politics of Exclusion. Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kitchin, Rob
    2014 “Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.” Big Data & Society1 (1): 1–12. doi:  10.1177/2053951714528481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurasawa, Fuyuki
    2013 “The Sentimentalist Paradox: On the Normative and Visual Foundations of Humanitarianism.” Journal of Global Ethics9 (2): 201–214. doi:  10.1080/17449626.2013.818461
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2013.818461 [Google Scholar]
  29. Laclau, Ernesto
    1997 “The Death and Resurrection of the Theory of Ideology.” MLN112 (3): 297–321. doi:  10.1080/13569319608420738
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319608420738 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lehr, Sabine
    2015 Germany as Host: Examining Ongoing Anti-Immigration Discourse and Policy in a Country with a High Level of Non-National Residents. https://refugeereview2.wordpress.com/2015/05/30/germany-as-host-examining-ongoing-anti-immigration-discourse-and-policy-in-a-country-with-a-high-level-of-non-national-residents/. Accessed20.07.2018.
  31. Leubecher, Marcel
    2015a “Bei Flüchtlingsaufnahme gibt es keine Obergrenze [There is no upper limit for the admisison of refugees].“ Die Welt (09.07.2015): 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2015b “‘Merkel hat die moralische Führungsrolle bewiesen‘ [Merkel has proved a moral leadership role].“ Die Welt (16.12.2015): 4.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2017 “Wer arbeitet, darf bleiben. [Who works can stay]“ Die Welt (29.06.2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. LexisNexis
    LexisNexis 2018 News data base. Accessed03.06.2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mattissek, Annika, and Tobias Schopper
    2019 “‘Culture’ in German Media Discourses on Refugees: A Political Geography Perspective.” InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila, 245–266. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_11 [Google Scholar]
  36. McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie
    2012Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
    2013Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS), Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pautz, Hartwig
    2018 “Constructing the ‘Immigrant’: Germany’s Radical Left in the Refugee Crisis.” German Politics27 (3):424–441. doi:  10.1080/09644008.2017.1312351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1312351 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pons
    Pons 2019Online-Wörterbuch. https://de.pons.com. Accessed07.06.2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rada, Roberta V.
    2016 “Zur Bedeutung des Wortes Willkommenskultur im deutschen Mediendiskurs [On the meaning of the term welcome culture in the German media discourse].“ Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik26 (1): 17–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Reckwitz, Andreas
    2016 Zwischen Hyperkultur und Kulturessenzialismus [Between hyperculture and cultural essentialism]. https://soziopolis.de/beobachten/kultur/artikel/zwischen-hyperkultur-und-kulturessenzialismus/. Accessed01.06.2018.
  42. 2017Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten: Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne [The Society of Singularities – On the Structural Transformation of Modernity]. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reiners, Wulf, and Funda Tekin
    2019 “Taking Refuge in Leadership? Facilitators and Constraints of Germany’s Influence in EU Migration Policy and EU-Turkey Affairs during the Refugee Crisis (2015–2016).” German Politics. doi:  10.1080/09644008.2019.1566457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1566457 [Google Scholar]
  44. Reisigl, Martin
    2013 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited byRobert Bayley, Richard Cameron and Ceil Lucas, 68–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidtke, Oliver
    2017 “Reinventing the Nation: Germany’s Post-Unification Drive Towards Becoming a ‘Country of Immigration’.” German Politics26 (4): 498–515. doi:  10.1080/09644008.2017.1365137
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1365137 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schnörch, Ulrich
    2014 “Überlegungen zur (adäquaten) lexikografischen Beschreibung des (‘politisch korrekten‘) Gebrauchs von Wörtern wie Ausländer, Migrant, Flüchtling, Asylbewerber [Thoughts on a (adequate) lexicographical description of the (“politically correct”) use of words like foreigner, migrant, refugee, asylum seeker].“ Deutsche Sprache42 (4): 347–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schulte, Ulrich
    2017 “untitled.” taz (17.09.2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stubbs, Michael
    2010 “Three Concepts of Keywords.” InKeyness in Texts, edited byMarina Bondi and Mike Scott, 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.41.03stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.03stu [Google Scholar]
  50. Triandafyllidou, Anna
    2018 “A ‘Refugee Crisis’ Unfolding: ‘Real’ Events and Their Interpretation in Media and Political Debates.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2): 198–216. doi:  10.1080/15562948.2017.1309089
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1309089 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ulbricht, Christian
    2017Ein- und Ausgrenzungen von Migranten: Zur sozialen Konstruktion (un-)erwünschter Zuwanderung [Inclusion and exclusion of migrants. On the social construction of (un)desirable immigration]. Bielefeld: transcript. 10.14361/9783839439296
    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839439296 [Google Scholar]
  52. Van Dijk, Teun
    2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume I, edited byDeborah Tannen, Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 352–371. Chichester; Malden: Wiley-Backwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Völker, Hanna
    2017 “Is the German Immigration Debate Changing? A Discourse Linguistic Approach to the German Immigration Debate. On Changes since the 1970s.” Living Linguistics (3): 87–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vollmann, Erik
    2017 “Angela Merkel et la politique des réfugiés 2015–2017. [Angela Merkel and the refugee policy of 2015–2017].“ Outre Terre52 (3): 117–124. doi:  10.3917/oute1.052.0117
    https://doi.org/10.3917/oute1.052.0117 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vollmer, Bastian, and Serhat Karakayali
    2018 “The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2): 118–139. doi:  10.1080/15562948.2017.1288284
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1288284 [Google Scholar]
  56. Von Borstel, Stefan, Martin Greive, and Benno Müchler
    2015 “Erst Flüchtling, dann deutscher Handwerker [first a refugee, then German craftsman].“ Die Welt (30.09.2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Weicht, Bernhard
    2017 “Old and Dependent: The Construction of a Subject Position for Politics and Care.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 500–513. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑38
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-38 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    2002Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19006.gri
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19006.gri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error