Individual moral otherness as a means to underscore sectoral otherness

References

1. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
   1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bar-Lev, Yehuda
   2007 “Yitsug mi’utim ba-shidur ha-tsiburi” [Representation of minorities in public television news broadcasting]. Master’s thesis, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
4. Ben-Rafael, Eliezer
   1998 “Nitschona shel ‘ha-safa ha-nechuta’” [The victory of the “inferior language”]. Panim7: 38–44.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Caplan, Kimmy
   2003 “Cheker ha-chevra ha-haredit be-Yisrael: Meafyenim, hesegim, ve-etgarim” [The study of Haredi society in Israel: Characteristics, achievements and challenges]. InḤaredim Yisraelim: Hishtalvut belo tmi’a? [Israeli Haredim: Integration without assimilation?], edited byEmmanuel Sivan and Kimmy Caplan, 88–112. Jerusalem: Hakibbutz Hameuchad and van Leer.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Caplan, Kimmy
   2007 Be-sod ha-siach ha-haredi [Internal popular discourse in Israeli Haredi society]. Jerusalem: The Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Etzioni-Halevy, Eva
   2000 Erets shesu’a: Haim milchemet tarbut hi bilti nimna’at? [The divided people: Can Israel’s Breakup Be Stopped?]. Kfar Saba: Arye Nir.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fairclough, Norman
   1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
   1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InIntroduction to Discourse Analysis, edited byTeun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin
    eds. 2015 The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.259
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.259 [Google Scholar]
11. First, Anat, and Eli Avraham
    2007 “Kikar ha-shuk homa? Al ha-givun ha-tarbuti be-arutsey ha-televizia ha-mischari’im be-Yisrael ve-al ha-drachim le-shipuro” [Multi-cultural diversity on commercial television channels in Israel and ways to improve it]. InHa-tikshoret ha-politit be-Yisrael [Political Communication in Israel], edited byDan Caspi, 134–161. Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grice, Herbert P.
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, edited byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grylak, Moshe
    2002 Ha-haredim: mi anachnu be-emet [The Haredim: Who are we really?]. Jerusalem: Keter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halttunen, Karen
    1998 Murder Most Foul: The Killer and the American Gothic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Harré, Rom, and Grant Gillett
    1994 The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Koren, Roselyne
    1997 “Matan shem ve-nekitat emda ba-itonut ha-politit be-Tsarfat” [Naming and side-taking in French political journalistic discourse]. Balshanut Ivrit41–42: 109–117.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Leech, Geoffrey Neil
    1974 Semantics. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Perelman, Chaïm
    1983 Mamlechet ha-retorika [The realm of rhetoric]. Jerusalem: Magnes.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Translated byJ. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Riffaterre, Michael
    1984 “Intertextual Representation: On Mimesis as Interpretive Discourse.” Critical Inquiry11, no.1: 141–162. 10.1086/448279
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448279 [Google Scholar]
23. Riffaterre, Michael
    1990 “Compulsory Reader Response: The Intertextual Drive. InIntertextuality: Theories and Practices, edited byMichael Worton and Judith Still, 56–80. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rogel, Nakdimon
    1995 Tadrich Nakdi: Tadrich chadashot ve-aktualia. [Nakdi Guidelines: Guidelines for coverage of news and current affairs] (internal document of the Israel Broadcasting Authority).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Schorsch, Jonathan
    2005 “Blacks, Jews and the Racial Imagination in the Writings of Sephardim in the Long Seventeenth Century,” Jewish History19: 109–135. 10.1007/s10835‑005‑4360‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-005-4360-0 [Google Scholar]
26. Schrag, Calvin O.
    2006 “Otherness and the Problem of Evil: How Does That Which Is Other Become Evil?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion60: 149–156. 10.1007/s11153‑006‑0008‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0008-3 [Google Scholar]
27. Sheleg, Yair
    2000 Ha dati’im ha-chadashim: Mabat achshavi al ha-chevra ha-datit be-Yisrael [The new religious Jews: A contemporary look at observant Jewish society in Israel]. Jerusalem: Keter.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2009 “Quotation Markers as Intertextual Codes in Electoral Propaganda.” Text and Talk29, no.4: 459–480. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.024 [Google Scholar]
29. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2013a “Disputing while Covering a Dispute on Television News: Discursive Devices and Their Interpretation by Viewers,” Language and Dialogue3, no.2, 208–233. 10.1075/ld.3.2.04shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.2.04shu [Google Scholar]
30. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2013b “The Construction of Paradoxes in News Discourse: The Coverage of the Israeli Haredi Community as a Case in Point.” Discourse Studies15, no.4: 463–480. 10.1177/1461445613482432
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613482432 [Google Scholar]
31. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2014 “About 1000 Haredim, Members of Ha’eda HaHaredit: Linguistic Patterns and Rhetorical Functions of Generalizations in the Israeli News,” Israel Studies19, no.3: 154–186. 10.2979/israelstudies.19.3.154
    https://doi.org/10.2979/israelstudies.19.3.154 [Google Scholar]
32. Stadler, Nurit
    2003 “Lehitparnes o lechakot le-nes: Ha-milkud ha-haredi ve-hishtakfuto be-yaḥasey tora ve-avoda” [Work, livelihood and the miraculous: Defining the Haredi dilemma in Israel]. InḤaredim Yisraelim: Hishtalvut belo tmi’a? [Israeli Haredim: Integration without assimilation?], edited byEmmanuel Sivan and Kimmy Caplan, 88–112. Jerusalem: Hakibbutz Hameuchad and Van Leer.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1991 Racism and the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2000 “New(s) Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach.” InEthnic Minorities and the Media, edited bySimon Cottle, 33–49. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies11: 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
36. Van Eersel, San, Chris Hermans, and Peter Sleegers
    2008 “Expressing Otherness in Interreligious Classroom Communication: Empirical Research into Dialogical Communication in Religiously Pluriform Learning Situations in Catholic Primary Schools. Journal of Empirical Theology21, no.1, 1–31. 10.1163/092229308X310722
    https://doi.org/10.1163/092229308X310722 [Google Scholar]
37. Weizman, Elda
    1998 “Emet o bdaya? Dibur yashir ba-itonut ha-yomit ha-ktuva” [True or False? Direct Speech in the Daily Press]. Balshanut Ivrit43, 29–42.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Weizman, Elda, and Marcelo Dascal
    1991 “On Clues and Cues: Strategies of Text Understanding.” Journal of Literary SemanticsXX, no1, 18–30.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Weizman, Elda, and Anita Fetzer
    eds. 2015 Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.60
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60 [Google Scholar]
40. Wodak, Ruth, and Brigitta Busch
    2004 “Approaches to Media Texts. InThe SAGE Handbook of Media Studies, edited byJohn D. H. Downing London: Sage. 10.4135/9781412976077.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976077.n6 [Google Scholar]
41. Yeshuvi, Naama
    (ed.) 2001 Hadara ve-dimuy shlili: I-shivyon batikshoret ha-Yisraelit [Exclusion and Negative Image: Inequality in Israeli media] (internal document of The Association for Civil Rights in Israel).
    [Google Scholar]