Volume 18, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article examines the 2016 British EU referendum and the domestic debates through citizens’ voices in the media, specifically on the emotions and narratives, on The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Express, the week before the referendum. British citizens felt, in their words, “bullied because of [their] political correctness” and pointed their anger and dissatisfaction against the EU (and Merkel’s) “obsession for open borders”. The analysis underlines that these emotions and narratives, combining immigration and sovereignty, have remained embedded in the post-Brexit days, and go back not just to Billig’s banal nationalism (1995), but show that voting Leave represented respect towards true British values, the “core country” as conceptualised by Taggart (2000). Powellism (Hampshire 2018) and Wright’s “encroanchment” of Englishness (2017), and the analysis on the immigration narrative explain how anti-immigration and sovereignty discourse is persisting and is influencing the social and political relation of Britain with Europe.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bale, Tim, Sean Hanley, and Aleks Szczerbiak
    2010 “‘May Contain Nuts’? The Reality behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British Conservatives’ New Group in the European Parliament.” Political Quarterly81 (1): 85–98. 10.1111/j.1467‑923X.2009.02067.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02067.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauman, Zygmunt
    2006Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. von Bismarck, Helene
    2019‘British exceptionalism is an intellectual trap’. UCL Brexit Blog. London: UCL European Institute, available online at: https://ucl-brexit.blog/2019/05/13/british-exceptionalism-is-an-intellectual-trap
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brack, Nathalie, and Nicholas J. Startin
    2015 “Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream.” International Political Science Review36 (3): 239–350. 10.1177/0192512115577231
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115577231 [Google Scholar]
  5. Casas, Andreu, and Nora Webb Williams
    2018 “Images that Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures.” Political Research Quarterly, available online first at: doi:  10.1177/1065912918786805
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918786805 [Google Scholar]
  6. Daddow, Oliver
    2011New Labour and the European Union: Blair and Brown’s Logic of History. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 “Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair and the Eurosceptic Tradition in Britain.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations15 (2): 210–222. 10.1111/j.1467‑856X.2012.00534.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00534.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, Will
    2016 “Thoughts on the Sociology of Brexit.” London: Goldsmiths University. Accessed at: www.perc.org.uk/project_posts/thoughts-on-the-sociology-of-brexit/
  9. Eurosphere
    Eurosphere 2013 “Diversity and the European Public Sphere. Towards a Citizens’ Europe.” Accessed at: eurosphere.uib.no/
  10. Fanoulis, Evangelos, and Simona Guerra
    2017 “Anger and protest: referenda and opposition to the EU in Greece and the UK.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs30 (4): 305–324. 10.1080/09557571.2018.1431766
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1431766 [Google Scholar]
  11. Galpin, Charlotte, and Hans-Joerg Trenz
    (2019) “Converging towards Euroscepticism? Negativity in news coverage during the 2014 European Parliament elections in Germany and the UK.” European Politics and Society20 (3): 260–276. 10.1080/23745118.2018.1501899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1501899 [Google Scholar]
  12. George, Stephen
    1998An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, Elizabeth
    2016 “An Emotional Break-Up: Historical Pathos Rhetoric in the Brexit Debate.” Authlanguage, 20July. Accessed at: https://thelanguageofauthoritarianregimes.wordpress.com/2016/07/20/an-emotional-break-up-historical-pathos-rhetoric-in-the-brexit-debate/#_ftn1
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guerrina, Roberta, Theofanis Exadaktylos, and Simona Guerra
    2016 “Brexit or Bremain: Britain and the 2016 British Referendum.” Research project, (University of Surrey and University of Leicester, June-July).
  15. Hampshire, James
    2018 “The Measure of a Nation.” The Political Quarterly. In advance to publication, accessed at: doi:  10.1111/1467‑923X.12545
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12545 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hannah, Daniel
    2016A Doomed Marriage. Why Britain Should Leave the EU. London: Notting Hill Ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayton, Richard
    2016 “The UK Independence Party and the Politics of Englishness.” Political Studies Review14 (3): 400–410. 10.1177/1478929916649612
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916649612 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamusella, Tomasz
    2012The Politics of Language and Nationalism in Modern Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Krastev, Ivan
    2017 “The Unmaking of the Liberal Revolution.” Talk at IWM Vienna. Accessed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIfGYL6nrjE
  20. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier & Timotheos Frey
    2006 “Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compare.” European Journal of Political Research45: 921–956. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2006.00644.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 “Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: a discourse-conceptual analysis of news media.” Critical Discourse Analysis. Article in press. Accessed at: https://browzine.com/articles/286264793
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mason, Lilliana
    2018Uncivil Agreement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. McNair, Brian
    2007An Introduction to Political Communication. London: Routledge, 4th ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Monnet, Jean
    1976Memoires. Paris Cedex: Fayard.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Neumann, Iver B.
    1999Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. University of Minnesota Press: NED, New Edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Parker, Noel
    (ed.) 2008The Geopolitics of European Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230610323
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230610323 [Google Scholar]
  27. Portice, Jennie & Stephen Reicher
    2018 “Arguments for European disintegration: a mobilization analysis of anti-immigration speeches by U.K. political leaders. Political Psychology, in advance to publication (via the authors). 10.1111/pops.12551
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12551 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ridge-Newman, Anthony
    2018 “Reporting the Road to Brexit: The EU Referendum and the Media.” InAnthony Ridge-Newman, Fernando León-Solís and Hugh O’Donnell (eds) Reporting the Road to Brexit. International Media and the Referendum 2016. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan: 3–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Right Side Broadcasting Network
    Right Side Broadcasting Network (2016) “‘Mr Brexit’ Nigel Farage Speaks at Donald Trump Rally in Jackson.” 24thAugust. Accessed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj4K9fr_WgY
  30. Schöpflin, Gyorgy
    2010The Dilemmas of Identity. Tallinn: Quaesitum Compertumque.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Startin, Nicholas J.
    2015 “Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK.” International Political Science Review36 (3): 311–323. 10.1177/0192512115574126
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115574126 [Google Scholar]
  32. Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Paul Taggart
    2002The party politics of euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states. Working Paper, No.51. Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex. Accessed at: sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/29357
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Taggart, Paul
    1998 “A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research33 (3): 363–388. 10.1111/1475‑6765.00387
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00387 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tang, Helen
    2000Winners and losers of EU integration: policy issues for Central and Eastern Europe. Washington D. C.: World Bank. 10.1596/0‑8213‑4427‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4427-7 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsebelis, George
    2018 “How can we keep direct democracy and Avoid Kolotoumba. Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey.” Homo Oeconomicus. In advance to publication, accessed at: doi:  10.1007/s41412‑018‑0069‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-018-0069-4 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tombs, Robert
    2016 ‘“Brexit” Debate Has Voters Asking: What Does it Mean to be English?” Robert Tombsinterviewed byMark Fisher. New York Times, 21June 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karen, Stephen Cushion, Andrew Williams, Simona Guerra, Iñaki Garcia-Blanco, and Dimitrios Tsagalas
    2010 “Diversity and the Public Sphere: The Case of UK.” Eurosphere Country Report No.17, Bergen: University of Bergen.
  39. Wodak, Ruth and Jo Angouri
    2014 “From Grexit to Grecovery: Euro/crisis discourses.” Discourse & Society25 (4): 417–423. 10.1177/0957926514536967
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536967 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wright, Patrick S.
    2017 “Turning Inward: Brexit, Encroanchment Narratives and the English as ‘Secret People’.” InEuropean Union and Disunion: Reflections on European Identity, ed. byAsh Amin & Philip Lewis, 64–72. London: British Academy.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Britain; content analysis; Eurosceptic narrative; immigration; sovereignty
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error