Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper uses a Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis (SF-MDA) approach to analyse tweets from the Twitter accounts of Presidents Barack Obama (@Barack Obama) and Donald Trump (@realDonaldTrump). The tweets were posted during the last nine months of President Obama’s effective presidency and the first nine months of President Trump’s presidency. The tweets are analysed using automated text analysis which is interpreted through an SF-MDA lens, supplemented by manual analysis. The analysis examines ideational and interpersonal emphasis in the tweets with the aim of showing how the composition and content construct a view of how each president and his presidency are presented to the public. The findings suggest marked contrasts in presidential style with President Trump foregrounding the interpersonal while President Obama foregrounds the ideational. Where President Trump presents as self-promoting, autocratic, opinionated and igniting discord in his tweets, President Obama presents as democratic, moderate, restrained and seeking social harmony.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auxier, Brooke, and Jennifer Golbeck
    2017 “The President on Twitter: A Characterization Study of@ realDonaldTrump.” InInternational Conference on Social Informatics, 377–390. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67217‑5_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_23 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barberá, Pablo, and Thomas Zeitzoff
    2018 “The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?” International Studies Quarterly62(1): 121–130. 10.1093/isq/sqx047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx047 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateman, John A.
    2014a “Looking for What Counts in Film Analysis: A Programme of Empirical Research.” InVisual Communication, ed. byDavid Machin, 301–329. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110255492.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255492.301 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014bText and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315773971
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773971 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve
    2019 “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PloS ONE14(9): e0222062. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 [Google Scholar]
  6. Conway, Bethany A., Kate Kenski, and Di Wang
    2015 “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(4): 363–380. 10.1111/jcc4.12124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124 [Google Scholar]
  7. Enli, Gunn
    2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication32(1): 50–61. doi:  10.1177/0267323116682802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802 [Google Scholar]
  8. Enli, Gunn, and Anja Aaheim Naper
    2016 “Social Media Incumbent Advantage: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney’s Tweets in the 2012 US Presidential Election Campaign.” InThe Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, ed. byAxel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 364–378. New York and London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gross, Justin H., and Kaylee T. Johnson
    2016 “Twitter Taunts and Tirades: Negative Campaigning in the Age of Trump.” PS: Political Science & Politics49 (4): 748–754. doi:  10.1017/S1049096516001700
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001700 [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1978Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2008Complementarities in Language. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jewitt, Carey
    ed. 2014The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jewitt, Carey, Josephus Johannes Bezemer, and Kay L. O’Halloran
    2016Introducing Multimodality. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315638027
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638027 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jungherr, Andreas
    2016 “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics13(1): 72–91. doi:  10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 607–618. 10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
  19. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker
    2018 “Re/constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourses, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (2): 141–154. doi:  10.1075/jlp.18007.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18007.krz [Google Scholar]
  20. Kress, Gunther, and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2006Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim
    2016 “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review42 (5): 849–855. doi:  10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu
    2018 “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review44(2): 201–213. doi:  10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, James R.
    1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin, James R., and David Rose
    2007Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin, James R., and Peter R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  27. O’Halloran, Kay L.
    ed. 2004Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2008 “Systemic Functional-Multimodal Discourse Analysis SF-MDA: Constructing Ideational Meaning Using Language and Visual Imagery.” Visual Communication7: 443–475. 10.1177/1470357208096210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210 [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Halloran, Kay L., and Victor Lim Fei
    2014 “Systemic Functional Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” InTexts, Images and Interactions: A Reader in Multimodality, ed. bySigrid Norris, and Carmen D. Maier, 137–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Halloran, Kay L., Sabine Tan, and Peter Wignell
    2019 “SFL and Multimodal Discourse Analysis. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ed. byGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine, and David Schönthal. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316337936.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.019 [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Toole, Michael
    2011The Language of Displayed Art, 2nd edition. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ott, Brian L.
    2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication34 (1): 59–68. doi:  10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 [Google Scholar]
  33. Perez, Sarah
    2017 “Twitter Officially Expands its Character Count to 280 Starting Today. AccessedJanuary 22, 2019. https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/07/twitter-officially-expands-its-character-count-to-280-starting-today/
  34. Ross, Andrew S., and David Caldwell
    2020 “‘Going Negative’: An Appraisal Analysis of the Rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter.” Language & Communication70: 13–27. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
    2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society4 (2): 1–12. doi:  10.1177/2056305118776010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Royce, Terry D.
    2007 Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. InNew Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. byTerry D. Royce, and Wendy Bowcher, 63–110. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, Aaron
    2009The Internet’s Role in Campaign 2008. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sorato, Danielly, and Renato Fileto
    2019 “Linguistic Pattern Mining for Data Analysis in Microblog Texts Using Word Embeddings.” InProceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, 1–8. doi:  10.1145/3330204.3330228
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3330204.3330228 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier
    2018 “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication35: 50–74. 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stolee, Galen, and Steve Caton
    2018 “Twitter, Trump, and The Base: A Shift to a New Form of Presidential Talk?.” Signs and Society6 (1): 147–165. doi:  10.1086/694755
    https://doi.org/10.1086/694755 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tasente, Tanase
    2020 “Twitter Discourse Analysis of US President Donald Trump.” Technium Social Sciences Journal2 (1): 67–75. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/49
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Trevisan, Piergiorgio
    2018 “‘Tweeting Engagement’. Strategies of Identity Construction and ‘Alignment-Disalignment’ in Donald Trump’s Use of Social Media.” Lingue e Linguaggi28: 337–353. doi:  10.1285/i22390359v28p337
    https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v28p337 [Google Scholar]
  43. Trump Twitter Archive
    Trump Twitter Archive. AccessedJanuary 22, 2019. www.trumptwitterarchive.com/archive
  44. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2005Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012 “The Critical Analysis of Musical Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies9: 319–328. 10.1080/17405904.2012.713204
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.713204 [Google Scholar]
  46. Vergeer, Maurice
    2015 “Twitter and Political Campaigning.” Sociology Compass9 (9): 745–760. 10.1111/soc4.12294
    https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12294 [Google Scholar]
  47. Watt, Anneliese, Caroline Carvill, Richard House, Jessica Livingston, and Julia M. Williams
    2017 “Trump Typhoon: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Donald’s Twitter Feed.” In2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 1–7. IEEE. doi:  10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013976
    https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013976 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wignell, Peter, Kevin Chai, Sabine Tan, Kay O’Halloran, and Rebecca Lange
    2018 “Natural Language Understanding and Multimodal Discourse Analysis for Interpreting Extremist Communications and the Re-Use of these Materials Online.” Terrorism and Political Violence. doi:  10.1080/09546553.2018.1520703
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1520703 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wignell, Peter, Kay O’Halloran, and Sabine Tan
    2019 “Semiotic Space Invasion: The Case of Donald Trump’s US Presidential Campaign.” Semiotica226: 185–208. doi:  10.1515/sem‑2017‑0109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0109 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, Yini, Chris Wells, Song Wang, and Karl Rohe
    2018 “Attention and Amplification in the Hybrid Media System: The Composition and Activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter Following during the 2016 Presidential Election.” New Media & Society20(9): 3161–3182. doi:  10.1177/1461444817744390
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744390 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error