1887
image of Who are ‘the people’?
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As expressions without clear definition but with strong normative charging, empty signifiers play an important role in political discourse. Uniting diverse populations under a common banner and endowing political demands with self-evident legitimacy, they constitute a potent tool for rallying support for political action. Among empty signifiers, one particularly versatile construct are ‘the people’ as bearers of ultimate political legitimacy. In this paper, we investigate how ‘the people’ are constructed in propagandistic conflict narratives during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, imbuing the concept with different meanings in the pursuit of competing political ends. We show how ‘the people’ are constructed as democratic sovereign, enduring nation, moral humans or dispersed media publics, each time summoning different kinds of legitimacy and using different strategies to construct encompassing consensus and marginalize dissent. We discuss implications for the study of ideological discourse, populism and political communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19057.pas
2020-03-25
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens
    2007 “Populism versus democracy.” Political studies55 (2): 405–424. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2007.00657.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajanovic, Edma, Stefanie Mayer, and Birgit Sauer
    2018 “Constructing ‘the people’.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (5): 636–654. 10.1075/jlp.18013.may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18013.may [Google Scholar]
  3. Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove
    2014 “How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters.” Comparative political studies47 (9): 1324–1353. 10.1177/0010414013512600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvares, Claudia, and Peter Dahlgren
    2016 “Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain.” European Journal of Communication31 (1): 46–57. 10.1177/0267323115614485
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115614485 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson, Benedict
    2006Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aragonès, Enriqueta, and Zvika Neeman
    2000 “Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition.” Journal of Theoretical Politics12 (2): 183–204. 10.1177/0951692800012002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692800012002003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Batistová, Anna, and Nico Carpentier
    2018 “Constructing the Czech nation.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (6): 713–743. 10.1075/jlp.17063.bat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17063.bat [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse studies7 (4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  9. Canovan, Margaret
    2005The people. Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, Paul
    2017 “‘The people’ in populist discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 582–594. 10.1075/jlp.17031.chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17031.chi [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahlberg, Lincoln
    2011 “Discourse theory as critical media politics? Five questions.” InDiscourse theory and critical media politics, ed. byLincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 41–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511_2 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Nico Carpentier
    2010 “Contesting the populist claim on ‘the people’ through popular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang.” Social Semiotics20 (2): 175–196. 10.1080/10350330903565899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903565899 [Google Scholar]
  13. Duvold, Kjetil, and Sten Berglund
    2014 “Democracy between ethnos and demos: Territorial identification and political support in the Baltic states.” East European Politics and Societies28 (2): 341–365. 10.1177/0888325413511851
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325413511851 [Google Scholar]
  14. Edelman, Murray
    1988Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenberg, Eric M.
    1984 “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.” Communication monographs51 (3): 227–242. 10.1080/03637758409390197
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197 [Google Scholar]
  16. Engel, Jakob, and Ruth Wodak
    2013 “Calculated ambivalence” and Holocaust denial in Austria.” InAnalysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. byRuth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 83–106. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Esser, Frank, Agnieszka Stępińska, and David Nicolas Hopmann
    2016 “Populism and the media. Cross-national findings and perspectives”, InPopulist political communication in Europe, ed. byToril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes De Vreese, 365–381. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Finlay, W. M. L.
    2007 “The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 46 (2): 323–341. 10.1348/014466606X113615
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X113615 [Google Scholar]
  19. Glasze, Georg
    2007 “The discursive constitution of a orld-spanning region and the role of empty signifiers: the case of Francophonia.” Geopolitics12 (4): 656–679. 10.1080/14650040701546103
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701546103 [Google Scholar]
  20. Handford, Michael
    2014 “Cultural identities in international, interorganisational meetings: a corpus-informed discourse analysis of indexical we.” Language and Intercultural Communication14 (1): 41–58. 10.1080/14708477.2013.866123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.866123 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, Kirk A.
    2014Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heinisch, Reinhard
    2003 “Success in opposition–failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office.” West European Politics26 (3): 91–130. 10.1080/01402380312331280608
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave
    2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.” European journal of political research46 (3): 319–345. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2006.00690.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Krämer, Benjamin
    2014 “Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects.” Communication Theory24 (1): 42–60. 10.1111/comt.12029
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kulyk, Volodymyr
    2018 “Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs34 (2–3): 119–138. 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1451232 [Google Scholar]
  26. Laclau, Ernesto
    1977Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. London: New Left Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2005On populist reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2006 “Ideology and post-Marxism.” Journal of Political Ideologies11 (2): 103–114. 10.1080/13569310600687882
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687882 [Google Scholar]
  29. Law, Alex
    2001 “Near and far: banal national identity and the press in Scotland”. Media, Culture & Society23 (3): 299–317. 10.1177/016344301023003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023003002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Liebes, Tamar, and Zohar Kampf
    2009 “Black and white and shades of gray: Palestinians in the Israeli media during the 2nd intifada.” The International Journal of Press/Politics14 (4): 434–453. 10.1177/1940161209336226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209336226 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liebes, Tamar
    1997Reporting the Arab-Israeli conflict: How hegemony works. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203180457
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203180457 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lipman, Maria, Kachkaeva, Anna, and Michael Poyker
    2018 “Media in Russia: Between modernization and monopoly”. InThe new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. byDaniel Treisman, 159–190. Washington: Brookings.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, Denis-Constant
    1995 “The choices of identity.” Social identities1 (1): 5–20. 10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayaffre, Damon, and Ronny Scholz
    2017 “Constructing ‘the French people’ – On Sarkozy’s populism.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (5): 683–705. 10.1075/jlp.16009.may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16009.may [Google Scholar]
  35. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
    2008 “Populism and the media”. InTwenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy, ed. byDaniele Albertazzi, and Duncan McDonnell, 49–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230592100_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592100_4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
    2018 “Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda.” Comparative Political Studies51 (13): 1667–1693. 10.1177/0010414018789490
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mudde, Cas
    2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition39 (4): 542–563. 10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2004.00135.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagle, John
    1997 “Ethnos, demos and democratization: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Democratization4 (2): 28–56. 10.1080/13510349708403514
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349708403514 [Google Scholar]
  39. Parekh, Bhikhu
    1995 “Ethnocentricity of the nationalist discourse.” Nations and Nationalism1 (1): 25–52. 10.1111/j.1354‑5078.1995.00025.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-5078.1995.00025.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Pasitselska, Olga
    2017 “Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse.” Discourse & Communication11 (6): 591–609. 10.1177/1750481317714127
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714127 [Google Scholar]
  41. Petersoo, Pille
    2007 “What does ‘we’ mean?: National deixis in the media.” Journal of Language and Politics6 (3): 419–436. 10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.08pet [Google Scholar]
  42. Phelan, Sean, and Lincoln Dahlberg
    2011 Discourse theory and critical media politics: An introduction. InDiscourse theory and critical media politics, ed. byLincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 1–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reisigl, Martin
    2017 “The discourse-historical approach.” InThe Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 44–59. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rheindorf, Markus
    2019Revisiting the toolbox of discourse studies: New trajectories in methodology, open data, and visualization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑19369‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19369-0 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ricoeur, Paul
    1992Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rojo, Luisa Martín, and Teun A. Van Dijk
    1997 “‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal ‘Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society8 (4): 523–566. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ryabinska, Natalya
    2014 “Media capture in post-communist Ukraine: Actors, methods, and conditions.” Problems of Post-Communism61 (2): 46–60. 10.2753/PPC1075‑8216610204
    https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216610204 [Google Scholar]
  48. Simons, Jon
    2011 “Mediated construction of the people: Laclau’s political theory and media politics.” InDiscourse theory and critical media politics, ed. byLincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 201–221. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511_9 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2004 “Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies9 (3): 253–267. 10.1080/1356931042000263519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519 [Google Scholar]
  50. Szostek, Joanna
    2017 “The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage.” Perspectives on Politics15 (2): 379–395. 10.1017/S153759271700007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700007X [Google Scholar]
  51. Taggart, Paul A.
    2000Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Theodoropoulou, Irene
    2019 “Social class struggle as a Greek political discourse.” Discourse & Society30 (1): 85–102. 10.1177/0957926518801080
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801080 [Google Scholar]
  53. Treisman, Daniel
    2018 “Rethinking Putin’s political order: Introduction”. InThe new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. byDaniel Treisman, 1–28. Washington: Brookings.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Leeuwen, Theo V.
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication”. Discourse & Communication1 (1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vartanova, Elena
    2012 “The Russian media model in the context of post-Soviet dynamics”. InComparing media systems beyond the Western world, ed. byDaniel C. Hallin, and Paolo Mancini, 119–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2017 “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Élites’, and the ‘People’.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 551–565. 10.1075/jlp.17030.wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17030.wod [Google Scholar]
  60. Wroe, Lauren Elizabeth
    2018 “‘It really is about telling people who asylum seekers really are, because we are human like anybody else’: Negotiating victimhood in refugee advocacy work.” Discourse & Society29 (3): 324–343. 10.1177/0957926517734664
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734664 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19057.pas
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19057.pas
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error