Parrhesia, orthodoxy, and irony

References

1. 2016 Presidential Debates
   2016 Presidential Debates (2016, March5). Tenth Republican Primary Debate – February 25 2016 on CNN[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/GasRDffe1Xg?list=PLMqE3b6F0v9IASi2euG9Th97sRbukOigQ
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2016 Presidential Debates
   2016 Presidential Debates (2016, March28). Twelfth Republican Primary Debate – March 10 2016 on CNN[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/h2nj-zCV-XM?list=PLMqE3b6F0v9IASi2euG9Th97sRbukOigQ
   [Google Scholar]
3. British Nationalist
   British Nationalist (2016, March4). Fox News Republican Presidential Debate 03/03/2016 Detroit[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/THUVZGRrVhQ
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cbinetwork
   Cbinetwork (2016, February7). FULL ABC GOP Debate 2016 in NH[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/M6qOCaYZ5w4
   [Google Scholar]
5. CBSN
   CBSN (2016, February15). Full CBS News South Carolina Republican Debate[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/Un3OhYs-tCE
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kelly, Jeff
   (2016, January15). FULL 6th GOP Republican Debate from 1/14[YouTube video]. RetrievedJanuary 11, 2019, fromhttps://youtu.be/zSQ6zBau9xs
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
   https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
9. Barth, Frederick
   1966 “Anthropological Models and Social Reality.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences165 (998): 20–34.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brion, Fabienne, and Harcourt, Bernard E.
    (eds) 2014 [1981] Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling: The Function of Avowal in Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cruz, Ted
    2015 A Time for Truth: Reigniting the Promise of America. New York: Broadside Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Elkins, James R.
    1978 “The Legal Persona: An Essay on the Professional Mask.” Virginia Law Review64: 735–762. 10.2307/1072538
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1072538 [Google Scholar]
13. Foucault, Michel
    1983 Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia (Six Lectures Given by Michel Foucault at Berkeley, Oct-Nov. 1983). AccessedDecember 15, 2018, fromhttps://foucault.info/parrhesia/
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gros, Frederick
    (Ed.) 2010 [1983] The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the College de France 1982–1983 (Graham Burchell. trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grossman, Matt and Hopkins David A.
    2016 Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Judis, John B.
    2016 The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed America and European Politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Habermas, Jurgen
    1991 [1962] The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hill, Jane
    1985 “The Grammar of Consciousness and the Consciousness of Grammar.” American Ethnologist12 (4), 725–737. 10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00080
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00080 [Google Scholar]
20. Hill, Jane
    1995 “The Voices of Don Gabriel.” InThe Dialogic Emergence of Culture, ed. byDennis Tedlock, and Bruce Mannheim. 97–147. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hill, Jane
    2000 “Read My Article: Ideological Complexity and the Overdetermination of Promising in American Presidential Politics.” InRegimes of Language, ed. byPaul V. Kroskrity. 259–291. New Mexico: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Judis, John B.
    2016 The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed America and European Politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kanwal, Safina and Garcia, Maria
    2019 “Representation of Gender through Framing: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s Selected Speeches.” International Journal of English Linguistics, 9 (2): 321–331. 10.5539/ijel.v9n2p321
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n2p321 [Google Scholar]
24. Kivisto, Peter
    2017 The Trump Phenomenon: How the Politics of Populism Won in 2016. Bingley, UK: Emerald House Publishing. 10.1108/9781787143678
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787143678 [Google Scholar]
25. Kling, Arnold
    2017 The Three Languages of Politics: Talking Across the Political Divides. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lakoff, Robin T.
    2017 “The Hollow Man: Donald Trump, Populism, and Post-Truth Politics.” Journal of Language & Politics, 16 (4): 595–606. 10.1075/jlp.17022.lak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17022.lak [Google Scholar]
27. Le Grézause, Esther
    2017 Um and Uh, and the Expression of Stance in Conversational Speech [Doctoral dissertation]. RetrievedMarch 9, 2018, fromhttps://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/40619/LeGrezause_washington_0250E_17870.pdf?sequence=1
28. Mertz, Elizabeth
    2007 The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer.”New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183108.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183108.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Miller, Paul Allen
    2006 “Truth-Telling in Foucault’s ‘Le Gouvernement de Soi et des Autres’ and Persius 1: The Subject, Rhetoric, and Power.” Parrhesia1: 27–61.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Morson, Gary, and Emerson, Caryl
    1990 Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Prochazka, Ondrej and Blommaert, Jan
    2019 “Ergoic Framing in New Right Online Groups: Q, the MAGA kid, and the Deep State Theory [Working Draft]”, April17 2019 RetrievedMay 4, 2019, fromhttps://alternative-democracy-research.org/2019/04/17/ergoic-framing-in-new-right-online-groups-q-the-maga-kid-and-the-deep-state-theory/
32. Rabinow, Paul
    (ed.) 1997 Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (Robert Hurley. trans.). New York, NY: The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rorty, Richard
    1989 Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804397
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397 [Google Scholar]
34. Simpson, Zachary
    2012 “The Truths We Tell Ourselves: Foucault on Parrhesia.” Foucault Studies, 13: 99–115, doi:  10.22439/fs.v0i13.3461
    https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i13.3461 [Google Scholar]
35. Trump, Donald J.
    2015 Great Again: How to Fix Our Crippled America. New York: Threshold Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Warner, Michael
    2002 Publics and Counterpublics. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books. 10.1215/08992363‑14‑1‑49
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49 [Google Scholar]