Sam Browse. (2018) Cognitive Rhetoric

References

1. Berens, Sam C., Jessica S. Horst, and Chris M. Bird
   2018 ‘Cross-Situational Learning Is Supported by Propose-but-Verify Hypothesis Testing’. Current Biology. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.042
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.042 [Google Scholar]
2. Bergen, Benjamin, and Nancy Chang
   2005 ‘Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding’. InConstruction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, edited byJan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 147–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.08ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber [Google Scholar]
3. Boas, Frank
   2013 ‘Cognitive Construction Grammar’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited byThomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, 176–88. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chilton, Paul
   2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London; New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
5. Chilton, Paul
   2014 Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
6. Christiansen, Morten H., and Nick Chater
   2016 ‘The Now-or-Never Bottleneck: A Fundamental Constraint on Language’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences39. 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500031X [Google Scholar]
7. Christiansen, Morten H., and Nick Chater
   2017 ‘Towards an Integrated Science of Language’. Nature Human Behaviour1 (8): 1–3. 10.1038/s41562‑017‑0163
   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0163 [Google Scholar]
8. Constantinescu, A. O., J. X. OReilly, and T. E. J. Behrens
   2016 ‘Organizing Conceptual Knowledge in Humans with a Gridlike Code’. Science352 (6292): 1464–68. 10.1126/science.aaf0941
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0941 [Google Scholar]
9. Dąbrowska, Ewa
   2016 ‘Cognitive Linguistics’ Seven Deadly Sins’. Cognitive Linguistics27 (4). 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0059
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0059 [Google Scholar]
10. Fairclough, Norman
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Feldman, Jerome, Ellen Dodge, and John Bryant
    2015 ‘Embodied Construction Grammar’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, edited byBernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 2nd ed., 111–38. Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2009 ‘Frames and Constructions: Putting Them Together’. presented at theFrames and Constructions, Berkeley, CA. www.icsi.berkeley.edu/icsi/node/4388
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2014 ‘Frames, Constructions, and FrameNet’. InConstructions Collocations Patterns, edited byThomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, and Susen Faulhaber, 121–66. Berlin; Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fischer, Kerstin
    2010 ‘Beyond the Sentence: Constructions, Frames and Spoken Interaction’. Constructions and Frames2 (2): 185–207. 10.1075/cf.2.2.03fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.2.2.03fis [Google Scholar]
15. Foolen, Ad
    1986 ‘Book Review: Paul Werth: Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis’. Journal of Semantics, no.5: 79–86. 10.1093/jos/5.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/5.1.79 [Google Scholar]
16. Gavins, Joanna
    2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
17. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2019 Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hart, Christopher
    ed. 2011 Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.43
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43 [Google Scholar]
19. Hart, Christopher
    ed. 2014 Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London; New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hasson, Uri, Giovanna Egidi, Marco Marelli, and Roel M. Willems
    2018 ‘Grounding the Neurobiology of Language in First Principles: The Necessity of Non-Language-Centric Explanations for Language Comprehension’. Cognition180: 135–57. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018 [Google Scholar]
21. Hickok, Gregory, and Steven Lawrence Small
    eds. 2016 Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam; Boston, MA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kay, Paul
    2004 ‘Pragmatic Aspects of Grammatical Constructions’. InHandbook of Pragmatics, edited byLaurence R. Horn and Gergory Ward, 675–700. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kemmerer, David
    2014 Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781315764061
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315764061 [Google Scholar]
24. Lamb, Sydney M.
    1999 Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.170
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.170 [Google Scholar]
25. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lieberman, Matthew D., D. Schreiber, and K. N. Ochsner
    2003 ‘Is Political Cognition like Riding a Bicycle? How Cognitive Neuroscience Can Inform Research on Political Thinking’. Political Psychology24 (4): 681–704. 10.1046/j.1467‑9221.2003.00347.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00347.x [Google Scholar]
28. Lilleker, Darren G.
    2014 Political Communication and Cognition. London; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137313430
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313430 [Google Scholar]
29. O’Halloran, Kieran
    2003 Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pulvermüller, Friedemann
    2013 ‘How Neurons Make Meaning: Brain Mechanisms for Embodied and Abstract-Symbolic Semantics’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences17 (9): 458–470. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004 [Google Scholar]
31. Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle, and Yury Shtyrov
    2013 ‘Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited byThomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sanford, Anthony J., and Patrick Sturt
    2002 ‘Depth of Processing in Language Comprehension: Not Noticing the Evidence’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences6 (9): 382–86. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)01958‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7 [Google Scholar]
33. Staresina, Bernhard
    2018, Thomas 2018, Reber, Johannes Niediek, Jan Boström, Christian E. Elger, and Florian Mormann 2019 ‘Recollection in the Human Hippocampal-Entorhinal Cell Circuitry’. Nature Communications10 (1). doi:  10.1038/s41467‑019‑09558‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09558-3 [Google Scholar]
34. Steels, Luc
    2012 Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ais.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.3 [Google Scholar]
35. Steels, Luc
    2013 ‘Fluid Construction Grammar’. InThe Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, edited byThomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Steels, Luc
    2017 ‘Basics of Fluid Construction Grammar’. Constructions and Frames9 (2): 178–225. 10.1075/cf.00002.ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00002.ste [Google Scholar]
37. Stockwell, Peter
    2002 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stockwell, Peter
    2014 ‘Atmosphere and Tone’. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, edited byPeter Stockwell and Sarah Whitely, 360–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139237031.027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139237031.027 [Google Scholar]
39. Trijp, Remi van
    2017 ‘A Computational Construction Grammar for English’. Technical SS-17-02. The AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Eecke, Paul, and Katrien Beuls
    2018 ‘Exploring the Creative Potential of Computational Construction Grammar’. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik66 (3): 341–55. 10.1515/zaa‑2018‑0029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0029 [Google Scholar]
41. Werth, Paul
    1984 Focus, Coherence, and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Werth, Paul
    1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Westen, Drew
    2008 The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]