Roderick, Ian. 2016. Critical Discourse Studies and Technology: A Multimodal Approach to Analysing Technoculture

References

1. Agamben, Giorgio
   2009 What is An Apparatus?: And Other Essays. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Deleuze, Gilles
   2006 “What is a Dispositif?” InTwo Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975–1995, edited byDavid Lapujade, trans.Ames Hodges and Mike Taormina, 338–48. New York: Semiotext[e]; orig. 1988–89.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fairclough, Norman
   2013 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman applied linguistics, 2. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
4. Kress, Gunther and van Leeuwen, Theo
   2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed.London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
5. Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth
   2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach”, inMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Simondon, Gilbert
   1980 On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects, translated byNinian Mellamphy. London, ON: University of Western Ontario.
   [Google Scholar]
7. van Dijk, Teun A.
   2008 Discourse and Context: A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
8. Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
   2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysisedited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–33. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]