1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines tweets posted by candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the weeks preceding the 2016 presidential debates in an effort to assess the ways in which the candidates’ language use either conformed to or refuted gender stereotypes. Analysis of 490 tweets (724 sentences) suggests that both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton used language in ways that were gender counterstereotypic. Clinton’s tweets contained a significantly greater number of statements and directives, suggesting that the candidate adopted a more masculine linguistic style, but also a greater number of cooperative words, which are stereotypically associated with feminine speech. Trump’s tweets contained a significantly greater number of exclamations, but fewer statements and directives than Clinton, thus defying masculine linguistic stereotypes. The implications of these findings on candidates’ political self-presentation are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19085.mcd
2020-01-15
2020-08-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alaimo, Kara
    2019, April9. “What Women Presidential Candidates Are Facing.” CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/09/opinions/women-candidates-voter-bias-alaimo/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachmann, Ingrid, Dustin Harp, and Jamie Loke
    2018 “Covering Clinton (2010–2015): Meaning-Making Strategies in US Magazine Covers.” Feminist Media Studies18 (5): 793–809. 10.1080/14680777.2017.1358204
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1358204 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamman, David, Jacob Eisenstein, and Tyler Schnoebelen
    2014 “Gender Identity and Lexical Variation in Social Media.” Journal of Sociolinguistics18 (2): 135–60. 10.1111/josl.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12080 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Nichole M.
    2017 “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology38 (2): 279–95. 10.1111/pops.12351
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12351 [Google Scholar]
  5. Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser
    2003 “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs70 (4): 335–50. 10.1080/0363775032000179133
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000179133 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ben-Zeev, Avi, Liz Scharnetzki, Lann K. Chan, and Tara C. Dennehy
    2012 “Hypermasculinity in the Media: When Men ‘Walk into the Fog’ to Avoid Affective Communication.” Psychology of Popular Media Culture1(1): 53–61. 10.1037/a0027099
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027099 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bimber, Bruce
    2014 “Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics11(2): 130–150. 10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brooks, Deborah Jordan
    2013He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, Judith
    1990Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlin, Diana B., and Kelly L. Winfrey
    2009 “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage.” Communication Studies60 (4): 326–43. 10.1080/10510970903109904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903109904 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coates, Jennifer
    1986Women, Men and Language. New York, NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013Women, Men and Everyday Talk. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137314949
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314949 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cunha, Evandro, Gabriel Magno, Marcos André Gonçalves, César Cambraia, and Virgilio Almeida
    2014 “He Votes or She Votes? Female and Male Discursive Strategies in Twitter Political Hashtags.” PLoS ONE9 (1): 1–8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087041
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087041 [Google Scholar]
  14. Darnell, Simon C., and Brian Wilson
    2006 “Macho Media: Unapologetic Hypermasculinity in Vancouver’s Talk Radio for Guys.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media3: 444–66. 10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Douglas, Susan
    2010Enlightened Sexism: The Seductive Message That Feminism’s Work is Done. New York, NY: Times Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eckert, Penelope
    1993 “Cooperative Competition in Adolescent “Girl Talk.” InGender and Conversational Interaction, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 32–34. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Enli, Gunn
    2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication32 (1): 50–61. 10.1177/0267323116682802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802 [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, Heather K., Kayla J. Brown, and Tiffany Wimberly
    2018 “‘Delete Your Account.’” Social Science Computer Review36 (4): 500–508. 10.1177/0894439317728722
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317728722 [Google Scholar]
  19. Foley, Williama
    2011 “Gender and Language in Ethnographic and Evolutionary Perspectives.” Reviews in Anthropology40 (2): 82–106. 10.1080/00938157.2011.572460
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00938157.2011.572460 [Google Scholar]
  20. Freed, Alice F., and Alice Greenwood
    1996 “Women, Men, and Type of Talk: What Makes the Difference?” Language in Society25 (1): 1–26. 10.1017/S0047404500020418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020418 [Google Scholar]
  21. Freeman, Rebecca, and Bonnie McElhinny
    1996 “Language and Gender.” InSociolinguistics and Language Education, ed. bySandra Lee McKay and Nancy H. Hornberger, 218–280. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fouhy, Beth
    2012, May7. “Twitter Plays Outsize Role in 2012 Campaign.” Daily Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gill, Rosalind
    2007Gender and the Media. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goidel, Kirby, Marco Ehrl, and Keith Gaddie
    2017 “Watching the News and Support for Democracy: Why Media Systems Matter.” Social Science Quarterly98 (3): 836–55. 10.1111/ssqu.12430
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12430 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grant, Judith
    1996 “Bring the Noise: Hypermasculinity in Heavy Metal and Rap.” Journal of Social Philosophy27 (2): 5–31. 10.1111/j.1467‑9833.1996.tb00235.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1996.tb00235.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Haas, Adelaide
    . “Male and Female Spoken Language Differences: Stereotypes and Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin86 (1979): 616–26. 10.1037/0033‑2909.86.3.616
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.616 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hensley-Clancy, Molly
    2019, October2. “Why Kamala Harris Uses Female Pronouns When She Talks About the Presidency.” Buzzfeed. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mollyhensleyclancy/kamala-harris-electability
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen
    1993 “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 119–147. 10.2307/2111526
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526 [Google Scholar]
  29. Iosub, Daniela, David Laniado, Carlos Castillo, Mayo Fuster Morell, and Andreas Kaltenbrunner
    2014 “Emotions under Discussion: Gender, Status and Communication in Online Collaboration.” PLoS ONE9 (8): 1–23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0104880
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104880 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, Jennifer J.
    2016 “Talk ‘Like a Man’: The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics14 (3): 625–42. 10.1017/S1537592716001092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001092 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kastrenakes, Jacob
    2018, February2. “Twitter Says People are Tweeting More, but not Longer, with 280-Character Limit. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/8/16990308/twitter-280-character-tweet-length
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Katz, Jackson
    2016Man enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the Politics of Presidential Masculinity. Northampton, MA: Interlink Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kimura, Doreen
    1992 “Sex Differences in the Brain.” Scientific American267 (3): 118–25. 10.1038/scientificamerican0992‑118
    https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0992-118 [Google Scholar]
  34. King, Ledyard, Marco della Cava, M., and Sarah Elbeshbishi
    2019 “Elizabeth Warren’s Latest Hurdle to the Presidency: Democrat’s Belief that Women Face Tougher Fight against Trump.” USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/10/elizabeth-warren-democrats-worry-electability-against-trump/2055209001/
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kramer, Cheris
    1973 “Women’s Speech: Separate But Unequal?,” Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the International Communication Assn. (Montreal, Canada, April 25–28, 1973).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kurtzleben, Danielle
    2019, January3. “The New Congress has a Record Number of Women  – but Very Few Republican Women.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/03/681027434/the-new-congress-has-a-record-number-of-women-but-very-few-republican-women
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lakoff, Robin
    1973 “Language and Woman’s Place.” Language in Society2 (1): 45–80. 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, Jayeon, and Young-shin Lim
    2016 “Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.” Public Relations Review42 (5): 849–55. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liao, Shannon
    2018, March2. “More Than a Third of All US Adults Use Instagram Now.” The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/2/17071604/facebook-youtube-twitter-instagram-social-media-pew-research-survey
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Linneman, Thomas J.
    2013 “Gender in Jeopardy! Intonation Variation on a Television Game Show.” Gender and Society27 (1), 82–105. 10.1177/0891243212464905
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212464905 [Google Scholar]
  41. Linskey, Annie
    2018, May21. “Inside the Trump Tweet Machine: Staff-Written Posts, Bad Grammar (On Purpose), and Delight in the Chaos.” Boston Globe. https://www3.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2018/05/21/trump-tweets-include-grammatical-errors-and-some-them-are-purpose/
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lyons, Benjamin A., and Aaron S. Veenstra
    2016 “How (Not) to Talk on Twitter: Effects of Politicians’ Tweets on Perceptions of the Twitter Environment.” CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking19 (1): 8–15. 10.1089/cyber.2015.0319
    https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0319 [Google Scholar]
  43. Maccoby, Eleanor E., and Carol N. Jacklin
    1974The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Meeks, Lindsey
    2013 “All the Gender That’s Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90 (3): 520–39. 10.1177/1077699013493791
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493791 [Google Scholar]
  45. McDonnell, Andrea
    2014Reading Celebrity Gossip Magazines. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. McGregor, Shannon C., Regina G. Lawrence, and Arielle Cardona
    2017 “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.”Information, Communication & Society20 (2): 264–83. 10.1177/1461444816686103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686103 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mosher, Donald L., and Mark Sirkin
    1984 “Measuring a Macho Personality Constellation.” Journal of Research in Personality18 (2): 150–163. 10.1016/0092‑6566(84)90026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(84)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
  48. Park, Gregory, David Bryce Yaden, H. Andrew Schwartz, Margaret L. Kern, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Michael Kosinski, David Stillwell, Lyle H. Ungar, and Martin E. P. Seligman
    2016 “Women Are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.” PLoS ONE11 (5): 1–26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155885
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155885 [Google Scholar]
  49. Quina, Kathryn, Joseph A. Wingard, and Henry G. Bates
    1987 “Language Style and Gender Stereotypes in Person Perception.” Psychology of Women Quarterly11 (1): 111–121. 10.1111/j.1471‑6402.1987.tb00778.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00778.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Romaniuk, Tanya
    2016 “On the Relevance of Gender in the Analysis of Discourse: A Case Study from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Presidential Bid in 2007–2008.” Discourse & Society27 (5): 533–53. 10.1177/0957926516651221
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516651221 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik
    2014 “Twitter and the Rise of Personal Publics.” InTwitter and Society, ed. byKatrin Weller, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schumann, Karina, and Michael Ross
    2010 “Why Women Apologize More Than Men: Gender Differences in Thresholds for Perceiving Offensive Behavior.” Psychological Science21 (11): 1649–55. 10.1177/0956797610384150
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384150 [Google Scholar]
  53. Siegler, David M., and Robert S. Siegler
    1973 “Stereotypes of Male and Female Speech.” Published report: Pennsylvania State University.
  54. Smith, Jessi L., David Paul, and Rachel Paul
    2007 “No Place for a Woman: Evidence for Gender Bias in Evaluations of Presidential Candidates.” Basic & Applied Social Psychology29 (3): 225–33. 10.1080/01973530701503069
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701503069 [Google Scholar]
  55. Spender, Dale
    1980Man Made Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Thomson, Rob, and Tamar Murachver
    2001 “Predicting Gender from Electronic Discourse.” British Journal of Social Psychology40 (2): 193–208. 10.1348/014466601164812
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164812 [Google Scholar]
  57. Troemel-Ploetz, Senta
    1992 “The Construction of Conversational Equality by Women. InLocating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Conference on Women and Language, ed. byKira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, and Birch Moonwomon. Berkeley, CA: University of California: 581–589.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tulviste, Tha, Luule Mizera, Boel De Geer, and Marja-Terttu Tryggvason
    2010 “Cultural, Contextual, and Gender Differences in Peer Talk: A Comparative Study.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology51 (4): 319–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vitriol, Joseph A., Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz, and Christina E. Farhart
    2018 “Implicit Candidate Traits in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Replicating a Dual-Process Model of Candidate Evaluations.” Electoral Studies54: 261–268. 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wagner, Kevin M., Jason Gainous, and Mirya R. Holman
    2017 “I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy38 (4): 430–55. 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268871 [Google Scholar]
  61. Weatherall, Ann
    2002Gender, Language and Discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Windett, Jason Harold
    2014 “Gendered Campaign Strategies in U.S. Elections.” American Politics Research42 (4): 628–655. 10.1177/1532673X13507101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X13507101 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yarchi, Moran, and Tal Samuel-Azran
    2018 “Women Politicians Are More Engaging: Male versus Female Politicians’ Ability to Generate Users’ Engagement on Social Media during an Election Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society21 (7): 978–95. 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1439985
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1439985 [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, Bei
    2014 “Language and Gender in Congressional Speech.” Literary and Linguistic Computing29 (1): 118–32. 10.1093/llc/fqs073
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs073 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19085.mcd
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gender , hypermasculinity , language , political communication , social media , stereotypes and Twitter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error