Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Since the 1990s, media commentators in the UK and elsewhere have praised women for introducing a “visibly different style of politics”, one symbol of which is the alleged preference of female politicians for a less adversarial and more co-operative style of political speech. Drawing on an analysis of the 2015 UK General Election campaign, we argue that this notion of women’s “different voice” has become increasingly central to the media’s construction of prominent female politicians as public figures, despite the evidence that it does not reflect any clear-cut pattern of differentiation between male and female political speakers of equivalent status and experience. Though it may seem to be an advance on previous negative representations of female politicians, we suggest that it reproduces – albeit in a “modernized” form – the long-established tendency of the media to evaluate women in relation to gendered norms and expectations, while men are judged as individuals.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adams, Karen L.
    2015 “Governors Debating: The Role of Situational, Discourse and Transportable Identities”. InDiscourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders, ed. byJohn Wilson and Diana Boxer, 217–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.63.10ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.63.10ada [Google Scholar]
  2. Banwart, Mary C. and Mitchell S. McKinney
    2005 “A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed-gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates”. Communication Studies, 56: 353–373. 10.1080/10510970500319443
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500319443 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, Deborah
    1997 “New Labour, No Feminism?” Trouble & Strife35: 69–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2007The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, Deborah and Shaw, Sylvia
    2016Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58752‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58752-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlin, Diana B. and Kelly L. Winfrey
    2009 “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage”. Communication Studies60(4): 326–43. 10.1080/10510970903109904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970903109904 [Google Scholar]
  7. Childs, Sarah
    2004 “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations6 (1): 3–19. 10.1111/j.1467‑856X.2004.00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00124.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, Catherine Evans
    2015 “Twitter as Political Discourse: the Case of Sarah Palin”, InDiscourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders, ed. byJohn Wilson and Diana Boxer, 91–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.63.05dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.63.05dav [Google Scholar]
  9. Gidengil, Elisabeth and Joanna Everitt
    2003 “Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage”, Political Communication, 20(3): 209–232. 10.1080/10584600390218869
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218869 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilligan, Carol
    1982In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Higgins, Michael and Fiona M. McKay
    2016 “Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: the Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon”. British Politics11(3): 283–300. 10.1057/bp.2015.44
    https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.44 [Google Scholar]
  12. Loughborough University Communication Research Centre
    Loughborough University Communication Research Centre 2015Media Coverage of the 2015 Campaign: Report 5blog.lboro.ac.uk/general-election/media-coverage-of-the-2015-campaign-report-5/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meeks, Lindsey
    2013 “All the Gender That Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90(3): 520–539. 10.1177/1077699013493791
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493791 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mäkelä, Johanna, Pekka Isotalus and Iiris Ruoho
    2015 “The Ball Is in the Women’s Court: The Portrayal of Women as Political Leaders in Finnish Newspapers”. InDiscourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders, ed. byJohn Wilson and Diana Boxer, 293–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.63.13mak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.63.13mak [Google Scholar]
  15. Ross, Karen
    2015 “Girls on Top, Who Knew? The Unpredictability of Pollsters and Publics”. InUK Election Analysis 2015: Media, Voters and the Campaign, ed. byDaniel Jackson and Einar Thorsen, 18. Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shaw, Sylvia
    2006 “Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates”. InSpeaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, ed. byJudith Baxter, 81–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230522435_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522435_5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle and Ross, Karen
    1996 “Women MPs and the Media: Representing the Body Politic”. Parliamentary Affairs, 49: 103–115. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028661
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028661 [Google Scholar]
  18. Tannen, Deborah
    1990You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TNS Global
    TNS Global 2015 Nicola Sturgeon Tops the Approval Ratings for Leaders’ Performance. 29Aprilwww.tnsglobal.com/uk/press-release/nicola-sturgeon-tops-ratings-for-leaders-performance
  20. Williams, Jennifer
    2019 ‘For Many, the Situation is Intolerable’ – What the Party Splits Say about Being a Woman in Politics. Manchester Evening News, February24. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/for-many-situation-intolerable-what-15877390
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Winters, Kristi and Edzia Carvalho
    2015 “Why Did Nicola and Nigel Do So Well out of the Debates? They Are Authentic and Articulate, That’s Why”. Qualitative Election Survey of Britain (QESB) 2015, 3May. https://wintersresearch.wordpress.com/media-coverage/blog-articles/
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): election debates; gendered mediation; speech style; UK politics; women.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error