1887
Volume 19, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the interactional functions of the so-prefaced answer, when used by interviewees in news and other political discussion broadcasts. Using the methods of conversation analysis, based on a data corpus of recent broadcasts from British mainstream television, the analysis shows that the so-preface functions in a cluster of related ways within the question-answer discourse structure of the political news interview. Specifically, it is used to reset or reframe the prior question from a standpoint of epistemic authority, enabling the interviewee to answer on their terms rather than the interviewer’s.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19089.hut
2020-03-24
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bolden, Galina
    2006 “Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction.” Journal of Communication, 56 (4): 661–688. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull, Peter
    2008 “Slipperiness, evasion and ambiguity.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27 (4): 333–344. 10.1177/0261927X08322475
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322475 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson, Judy
    1984 “Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fairclough, Norman
    2000New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Greatbatch, David
    1986 “Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees.” Media, Culture and Society, 8 (4): 441–455. 10.1177/0163443786008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005 [Google Scholar]
  8. 1988 “A turn-taking system for British news interviews.” Language in Society, 17: 401–430. 10.1017/S0047404500012963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963 [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris, Sandra
    1991 “Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews.” InBroadcast Talk, ed. byPaddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Heritage, John
    1984 “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1985 “Analysing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, Volume 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013 “Turn-initial position and some of its occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics, 57: 331–337. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025 [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
    (eds) 2018Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-Initial Particles Across Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchby, Ian
    2011 “Non-neutrality and argument in the Hybrid Political Interview.” Discourse Studies, 13 (3): 349–366. 10.1177/1461445611400665
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400665 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 “Obama in the No Spin Zone.” InMedia Talk and Political Elections in Europe and the USA, ed. byMats Ekstrom and Andrew Tolson, 41–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137273321_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273321_3 [Google Scholar]
  16. James, Oliver
    2013 “So, here’s a carefully packaged sentence that shows me in my best light.” The Guardian, Friday26July.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  18. Lewis, Michael
    1999The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Montgomery, Martin
    2011 “The accountability interview, politics and change in UK public service broadcasting.” InTalking Politics in the Broadcast Media, ed. byMats Ekstrom and Mariana Patrona, 33–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.42.06mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.42.06mon [Google Scholar]
  20. Nunberg, Geoff
    2015 “So, what’s the big deal with starting a sentence with ‘so’?” www.npr.org/2015/09/03/432732859/
  21. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 79–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1989 “Constructing skepticism: Four devices used to engender the audience’s skepticism.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22: 293–314. 10.1080/08351818809389307
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389307 [Google Scholar]
  23. Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene Lerner
    2009 “Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42: 91–115. 10.1080/08351810902864511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864511 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sterbenz, Christina
    2014 “So here’s why everyone is starting sentences with the word ‘so’.” Business Insider, May12 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19089.hut
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation analysis , epistemics , evasion , news interviews , so-preface and turn-initial particles
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error