Volume 19, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This article analyses the humanitarianism and securitisation nexus in effect to migration controls in Italy and Hungary. Noteworthy for our purposes is how the humanitarian discourse is undervalued as the EU border states emphasise either full securitisation or else securitisation as a condition for humanitarianism when it comes to border management and refugee protection measures. Our goal is to trace, on the one hand, how politicians conceptualise humanitarianism for the self and for the extension of the self; and, on the other, how they subscribe to humanitarianism for the other as long as the other follows what the self demands. Reflecting on the institutional and discursive nexus of humanitarianism and securitization in effect to migration controls, we trace political narratives of Europeanisation geared to affect the public. We refer to how securitisation challenges humanitarianism while undervaluing human rights for the other and foregrounding human rights for the self.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andrade, Paula García
    2014 “Initiatives of EU Member States in Managing Mixed Flows in the Mediterranean and the EU Distribution of Competences.” InThe Common European Asylum System and Human Rights: Enhancing Protection in Times of Emergencies, eds.Claudio Matera and Amanda Taylor. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, CLEER Working Papers2014/7.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Balzacq, T.
    2005 “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations11(2): 171–201. doi:  10.1177/1354066105052960
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnett, Michael
    2013 “Humanitarian Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science16: 79–98. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑012512‑083711
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012512-083711 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baudet, T.
    (2015) A határok jelentősége, Budapest: Századvég.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biondi, Paolo
    2012 “The Externalization of the EU’s Southern Border in Light of the EU/Libya Framework Agreement: A Lawful Alternative or a Neo-Refoulement Strategy?” Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law6(1): 144–207. doi:  10.1515/icl‑2012‑0111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2012-0111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Jamie and Dadu, Saagarika
    2018 “Migrant rights in an age of international insecurity: Exploring the narratives of protection and security in European migration and refugee law” [Discussion or working paper] Available online at: https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/9186/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Casas-Cortes, Maribel, Sebastian Cobarrubias, Nicholas De Genova, Glenda Garelli, Giorgio Grappi, Charles Heller, Sabine Hess,
    2015 “New Keywords: Migration and Borders.” Cultural Studies29(1): 55–87. doi:  10.1080/09502386.2014.891630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2014.891630 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamber of Deputies and Senate of the Republic
    Chamber of Deputies and Senate of the Republic 2013Indagine Conoscitiva Sulle Nuove Politiche Europee in Materia Di Immigrazione. Rome: Chamber of Deputies and Senate of the Republic.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cuttitta, Paolo
    2014 “From the Cap Anamur to Mare Nostrum: Humaniarianism and Migration Controls at the EU’s Maritime Borders.” InThe Common European Asylum System and Human Rights: Enhancing Protection in Times of Emergencies, eds. byClaudio Matera and Amanda Taylor. The Hague: Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, 21–37. CLEER Working Papers2014/7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2018 “Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean.” Geopolitics23(3): 632–60. doi:  10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834 [Google Scholar]
  11. European Parliamentary Research Service
    European Parliamentary Research Service 2018Hotspots at EU External Borders: State of Play. European Parliament.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Frelick, Bill, Ian M. Kysel, and Jennifer Podkul
    2016 “The Impact of Externalization of Migration Controls on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Other Migrants.” Journal on Migration and Human Security4(4): 190–220. doi:  10.1177/233150241600400402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241600400402 [Google Scholar]
  13. Guild, Elspeth and Didier Bigo
    eds. 2005Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hansen, L.
    2006Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kallius, Annastiina, Monterescu Daniel, and Rajaram Prem Kumar
    2016 “Immobilizing mobility: Border ethnography, illiberal democracy and the politics of the “refugee crisis” in Hungary.” American Ethnologist43(1): 1548–1425. doi:  10.1111/amet.12260
    https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12260 [Google Scholar]
  16. Korkut, Umut and Eslen-Ziya, Hande
    2017Politics and Gender Identity in Turkey: Centralised Islam for Socio-Economic Control, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315405384
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315405384 [Google Scholar]
  17. Korkut, Umut, Mahendran, Kesi, Bucken-Knapp, Gregg and Cox, Robert Henry
    eds. 2015Discursive Governance in Politics, Policy and the Public Sphere. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137495785
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137495785 [Google Scholar]
  18. Korkut, Umut and Eslen-Ziya, Hande
    2018 Politics and Gender Identity in Turkey. Centralised Islam for Socio-Economic Control. London and New York: Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2019 “Brexit and the imaginary ‘crisis’: A discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media.” Critical Discourse Studies16(4): 465–490. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society27(3): 3028–321. doi:  10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lamour, Cristian and Varga, Renata
    2017 “The Border as a Resource in Right-Wing Populist Discourse: Victor Orbán and the Diasporas in a Multi-scalar Europe.” Journal of Borderland Studies doi:  10.1080/08865655.2017.1402200
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1402200 [Google Scholar]
  22. Little, Adrian and Nick Vaughan-Williams
    2017 “Stopping Boats, Saving Lives, Securing Subjects: Humanitarian Borders in Europe and Australia.” European Journal of International Relations23(3): 533–56. doi:  10.1177/1354066116661227
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116661227 [Google Scholar]
  23. Menjívar, Cecilia
    2014 “Immigration Law Beyond Borders: Externalizing and Internalizing Border Controls in an Era of Securitization.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science10: 353–69. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑lawsocsci‑110413‑030842
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030842 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mumby, Denis K. and Robin P. Clair
    1997 “Organizational Discourse” InTeun A. van Dijked.Discourse Studies, Volume 2: Discourse and Social Interaction, 181–205: London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Murray, Philomena and Michael Longo
    2018 “Europe’s wicked legitimacy crisis: the case of refugees”, Journal of European Integration, vol.40(4): 411–425. 10.1080/07036337.2018.1436543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1436543 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagy, B.
    2016 Year “Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization instead of Loyal Cooperation.” German Law Journal, Special Issue: Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis. Volume(issue): 17(6): 1033–1081. doi:  10.1017/S2071832200021581
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021581 [Google Scholar]
  27. Paoletti, Emanuela
    2012 “Migration Agreements between Italy and North Africa: Domestic Imperatives versus International Norms.” Available at: https://www.mei.edu/publications/migration-agreements-between-italy-and-north-africa-domestic-imperatives-versus
  28. Pap, Norbert and Glied, Viktor
    2017 “The Hungarian Border Barrier and Islam.” Journal of Muslims in Europe6(1): 104–131. doi:  10.1163/22117954‑12341339
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22117954-12341339 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sciurba, Alessandra and Filippo Furri
    2018 “Human Rights Beyond Humanitarianism: The Radical Challenge to the Right to Asylum in the Mediterranean Zone.” Antipode50(3): 763–82. doi:  10.1111/anti.12348
    https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12348 [Google Scholar]
  30. Scott, James Wesley
    2018 “Border Politics in Central Europe: Hungary and the Role of National Scale and Nation-Building.” Geographia Polonica91(1): 17–32. doi:  10.7163/GPol.0101
    https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0101 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stepka, Maciej
    2018 “Humanitarian Securitization of the 2015 ‘Migration Crisis’. Investigating Humanitarianism and Security in the EU Policy Frames on Operational Involvement in the Mediterranean.” InMigration Policy in Crisis, eds. by, Ibrahim Sirkeci, Emilia Lana de Freitas Castro, and Ulku Sezgi Sozen, 9–30. London: Transational Press.
  32. Szalai, Andras
    2017 Securitization as Enacted Melodrama: The Political Spectacle of the Hungarian Anti-Immigration Campaign, ECPR Conference2017, Available Onlinehttps://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/67b21ad4-d637-42c9-99fa-64796cb5284f.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Szalai, Andras and Gabriela Gőbl
    2015 Securitizing Migration in Contemporary Hungary, CEU Center for EU Enlargement Studies Working paper. November 2015, Available Onlinehttps://cens.ceu.edu/sites/cens.ceu.edu/files/attachment/event/573/szalai-goblmigrationpaper.final.pdf
  34. Szalai, Mate, Csornai, Zsuzsanna. and Garai, Nikolett
    2017 V4 Migration Policy: Conflicting Narratives and Interpretative Frameworks, Barcelona Center for Foreign Affairs. Available Onlinehttps://www.cidob.org/en/articulos/monografias/illiberals/v4_migration_policy_conflicting_narratives_and_interpretative_frameworks
  35. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2008Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
  36. van Rythoven, E.
    2015 “Learning to feel, learning to fear? Emotions, imaginaries, and limits in the politics of securitization.” Security Dialogue46(5): 458–475. doi:  10.1177/0967010615574766
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615574766 [Google Scholar]
  37. Watson, Scott
    2011 “The ‘human’ as Referent Object? Humanitarianism as Securitization.” Security Dialogue42(1): 3–20. doi:  10.1177/0967010610393549
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610393549 [Google Scholar]
  38. Weldes, Jutta
    1996 “Constructing National Interests.” European Journal of International Relations2(3): 275–318. doi:  10.1177/1354066196002003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002003001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wodak, Ruth
    2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2008 Introduction: Discourse Studies – Important Concepts and Terms, InQualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michal Krzyżanowskipp.1–29. Houndmills: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4_1 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error