1887
image of Bacteria, garbage, insects and pigs
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the symbolic meanings of metaphors and their potential social effects. Specifically, it examines the case of the Jewish Ultra-Orthodox “Ḥardakim” poster campaign distributed throughout Ultra-Orthodox communities in Israel in 2013. Following social group theory, the paper interprets the symbolic meanings of the main metaphors in the campaign in order to reconstruct the lifeworld of this religious group. On that basis, it offers a discussion of how metaphors were strategically utilized in order to draw social boundaries, uphold social norms and sanction group members who deviate from those. The paper’s empirical contribution is a case study of how symbolic meanings of metaphors as a part of propagandistic discourse targets and exploits social identities in order to mobilize collective emotions thereby provoking certain actions. It contributes theoretically by arguing that deeming norm-deviant group members internal threats is an efficient propaganda tool for maintaining intragroup behavioral codes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19109.sim
2020-07-20
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrams, Dominic, Georgina Randsley de Moura, Paul Hutchison, and Viki Tendayi
    2005 “When Bad Becomes Good (and vice versa): Why social exclusion is not based on difference.” InThe Social Psychology of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited byDominic Abrams, Jose M. Marques, and Michael A. Hogg, 161–190. New York: Psychology Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alford, C. Fred
    1994Group Psychology and Political Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allport, W. Gordon
    1954The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1955The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Altheide, L. David
    2006 “Terrorism and the Politics of Fear.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies6, no.4 (November): 415–439. doi:  10.1177/1532708605285733
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605285733 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013 “Media logic, social control, and fear.” Communication Theory23, no.3 (July 2013): 223–238. doi:  10.1111/comt.12017
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumeister, F. Roy, and Mark R. Leary
    1995 “The Need to Belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.” Psychological Bulletin117, no.3 (May): 497–529. doi:  10.1037/0033‑2909.117.3.497
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bar-Tal, Daniel, Eran Halperin, and Joseph de Rivera
    2007 “Collective emotions in conflict situations: societal implications.” Journal of Social Issues63, no.2 (June): 441–460. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4560.2007.00518.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00518.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Jeremy
    2018 “Menachot 64b ~ Cursed Be He Who Raises Swine.” Talmudology. October12 2018 www.talmudology.com/jeremybrownmdgmailcom/2018/10/3/menachot-64b-cursed-be-the-one-who-raises-swine
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Rupert
    1989Group Processes: Dynamics within and Between Groups (2nd ed.)Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2000Group Processes: Dynamics within and Between Groups (2nd ed.) Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cassirer, Ernst
    1944An Essay on Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chilton, Paul
    2005 “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors: the case of Mein Kampf.” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, edited byLouise de Saussure, and Peter J. Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohn, Norman
    1975Europe’s Inner Demons: An Enquiry Inspired by the Great Witch-Hunt. London: Chatto.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Coleman-Brueckheimer, Kate, Joseph Spitzer, and Jonathan Koffman
    2009 “Involvement of Rabbinic and Communal Authorities in Decision-Making by Haredi Jews in the UK with Breast Cancer: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.” Social Science & Medicine68 (January): 323–333. doi:  10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Douglas, Mary
    2001Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://monoskop.org/images/7/7d/Douglas_Mary_Purity_and_Danger_An_Analysis_of_Concepts_of_Pollution_and_Taboo_2001.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Durkheim, Émile
    1954The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: Hollen Street Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellul, Jacques
    1973Propaganda: The formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1965Propaganda: The formation of Men’s Attitudes. New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Elster, Jon
    1999Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6498.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6498.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Farkash, Tali
    2014 “Haredi soldier: Our life is a nightmare.” Ynet News. December7 2013 https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4403802,00.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fass, Hester, and Ronit Lazar
    2011 “Social Work and the Haredi Community in Israel: from rejection to acceptance as reflected in the narrative of a haredi social worker.” Reflections17, no.4 (Fall): 32–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Forceville, Charles
    2008 “Metaphor in Pictures and Multimodal Representations.” InCambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited byRaymond Gibbs Jr., 464–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 “Creativity in Pictorial and Multimodal Advertising Metaphors.” InDiscourse and Creativity, edited byRodney Jones, 113–132. London: Harlow: Pearson/Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Freud, Sigmund
    1960Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. New York: Bantam Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Furedi, Francis
    1997Culture of Fear. Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Furniss, Jamie
    2012 Metaphors of Waste: Several Ways of Seeing “Development” and Cairo’s Garbage Collectors. Doctoral Thesis. University College. https://www.academia.edu/1901293/Metaphors_of_Waste_Several_ways_of_seeing_Development_and_Cairos_Garbage_Collectors
  28. Gabbay, Ezra, Matthew W. McCarthy, and Joseph Fins
    2017 “The Care of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Patient.” Journal of Religious Health56 (April): 545–560. doi:  10.1007/s10943‑017‑0356‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0356-6 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gerring, J. Richard, and Alice F. Healy
    1983 “Dual Processes in Metaphor Understanding: Comprehension and appreciation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition9, no.4 (October): 667–675. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.9.4.667
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.667 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gibbs, W. Jr. Raymond
    2019 “Metaphor as Dynamical–Ecological Performance.” Metaphor and Symbol34, no.1 (May): 33–44. doi:  10.1080/10926488.2019.1591713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591713 [Google Scholar]
  31. Girard, René
    2005Violence and the Sacred. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Glassner, Barry
    1999The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goodman, Yehuda, and Eliezer Witztum
    2002 “Cross-Cultural Encounters between Care Providers: Rabbis’ referral letters to a psychiatric clinic in Israel.” Social Science & Medicine55 (October): 1309–1323. doi:  10.1016/S0277‑9536(01)00278‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00278-7 [Google Scholar]
  34. Har-Peled, Misgav
    2013 The Dialogical Beast: The Identification of Rome With the Pig in Early Rabbinic Literature. Ph.D. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University. https://www.academia.edu/3201368/The_Dialogical_Beast._The_Identification_of_Rome_with_the_Pig_in_Early_Rabbinic_Literature_PhD_thesis_March_2013_
  35. Heilman, Samuel and Eliezer Witztum
    1997 “Value-sensitive therapy: learning from ultra-orthodox patients”. American journal of psychotherapy51, no4 (April): 522–541. doi:  10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1997.51.4.522
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1997.51.4.522 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hiddush
    Hiddush 2013 “The “Hardak” Phenomenon and the next phase in the ultra-Orthodox service conflict.” Hiddush, June24 2013 hiddush.org/article-2467-0-The_Hardak_Phenomenon_and_the_next_phase_in_the_ultraOrthodox_service_conflict_.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hollingsworth, Christopher
    2001Poetics of the Hive: Insect Metaphor in Literature. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Inayatullah, Sohail, Aleksandra Izgarjan, Osmo Kuusi, and Matti Minkkinen
    2016 “Metaphors in Futures Research.” Futures84, no.B (May): 109–114. doi:  10.1016/j.futures.2016.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Isaacs, R. Harold
    1975Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1989Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Janis, L. Irving
    1972Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jowett, Garth, and Victoria O’Donnell
    2012Propaganda and Persuasion (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kamin, Deborah
    2013 “In ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods, anti-IDF posters ‘recall Nazi propaganda.” Times of Israel, July3 2013 https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-ultra-orthodox-neighborhoods-anti-idf-posters-recall-nazi-propaganda/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kant, Immanuel
    1959Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Library of Liberal Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Le Bon, Gustave
    1896The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1909The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Linker, Damon
    2000 “From Kant to Schelling: counter-enlightenment in the name of reason.” The Review of Metaphysics54, no.2 (December): 337–377. www.jstor.org/stable/20131534
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lakoff, George
    1992Metaphor and War: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. UC Berkeley: Department of Linguistics. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sm131vj
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought, edited byAndrew Ortony, 202–251. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mahaney, C. Darlene
    2002Propaganda Posters. OAH Magazine of History 16, no.3(Spring): 41–46. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ660079
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McCrann, Grace-Ellen
    2009 “Government Wartime Propaganda Posters: Communicators of Public Policy.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian28, no.1–2 (May): 53–73. doi:  10.1080/01639260902862058
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01639260902862058 [Google Scholar]
  54. McQuarrie, F. Edward, and David Glen Mick
    1999 “Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: textinterpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses.” Journal of Consumer Research26, no.1: 37–54. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f283/a99d8449ab06ee2749aad52ad2e95bc1fc71.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Mitchell, Peta
    2012Contagious Metaphor. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Moore, Jr. Barrington
    2000Moral Purity and Persecution in History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Musolff, Andreas
    2012 “The study of Metaphor as part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies9, no.3 (May): 301–310. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2012.688300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in press and online media.” InContemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, edited byMonika Kopytowska, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Oaten, Megan, Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case
    2009 “Disgust as a Disease-avoidance Mechanism.” Psychological Bulletin135, no.2 (March): 303–321. doi:  10.1037/a0014823
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014823 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ojha, Amitash
    2013 An Experimental Study on Visual Metaphors. PhD dissertation, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad, India. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amitash_Ojha2/publication/307606894_An_experimental_study_on_visual_metaphor/links/57cd40ac08aedb6d6d9dd0f9.pdf
  61. Paprotté, Wolf, and René Dirven
    1985 “Metaphor and the System of Languages: The ubiquity of metaphor.” InMetaphor in Language and Thought, edited byWolf Paprotté & René Dirven, i–vii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Phillips, J. Barbara
    1997 “Thinking Into It: consumer interpretation of complex advertising images.” Journal of Advertising26, no.2 (May): 77–87. doi:  10.1080/00913367.1997.10673524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673524 [Google Scholar]
  63. Pinto, R. Isabel, José M. Marques, John M. Levine, and Dominic Abrams
    2016 “Membership Role and Subjective Group Dynamics: impact on evaluative intragroup differentiation and commitment to prescriptive norms.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations19, no.5 (July): 570–590. doi:  10.1037/a0018187
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018187 [Google Scholar]
  64. Ribot, Théodule-Armand
    1897The Psychology of Emotions. London, UK: Walter Scott.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Robin, Corey
    2004Fear: the history of a political idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark R. McCauley
    2000 “Disgust.” InHandbook of Emotions 2nd Edition, edited byMichael Lewis, and Jeanette M. Haviland-Jones, 637–653. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Popovsky, A. Mark
    2010 “Special Issues in the Care of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Psychiatric In-patients.” Transcultural Psychiatry47, no.4 (October): 647–672. doi:  10.1177/1363461510383747
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461510383747 [Google Scholar]
  68. Schaller, Mark, and Lesley A. Duncan
    2007 “The Behavioral Immune System: Its evolution and social psychological implications.” InEvolution and the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Cognition, edited byWilliam von Hippel, Martie G. Haselton, and Joseph P. Forgas, 293–307. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Scheufele, A. Dietram
    1999 “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication49, no.1 (February): 103–122. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02784.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x [Google Scholar]
  70. Schmitt, Carl
    1996The Concept of the Political. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sennet, R.
    1996The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Sennett, R.
    2008 “The Myth of a Purified Community.” InThe Community Development Reader, edited byJames De Filippis, and Susan Saegert, 174–180. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Simonsen, Sandra
    2019 “Discursive Legitimation Strategies: the evolving legitimation of war in Israeli public diplomacy.” Discourse & Society30, no.5 (June): 503–520. doi:  10.1177/0957926519855786
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519855786 [Google Scholar]
  74. Smith, R. Eliot
    1993 “Social Identity and Social Emotions: toward new conceptualization of prejudice.” InAffect, Cognition and Stereotyping: Interactive Processes in Group Perception, edited byDiane M. Mackie, and David Lewis Hamilton, 297–315. San Diego: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑088579‑7.50017‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-088579-7.50017-X [Google Scholar]
  75. Smith, Philip
    2014 “Of ‘Near Pollution’ and Non-Linear Cultural Effects: Reflections on Masahiro Mori and the Uncanny Valley.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology2, no.3 (October): 329–347. doi:  10.1057/ajcs.2014.11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2014.11 [Google Scholar]
  76. Stephan, G. Walther, and Cookie White Stephan
    2000 “An Integrated Threat theory of Prejudice.” InThe Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, edited byStuart Oskamp, 23–45. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Steuter, Erin, and Deborah Wills
    2010 “’The Vermin have Struck Again’: Dehumanizing the enemy in post 9/11 media representations.” Media, War & Conflict3, no.2 (July): 152–167. doi:  10.1177/1750635210360082
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635210360082 [Google Scholar]
  78. Strasser, Susan
    1999Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. New York: Metropolitan Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner
    1979 “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” InThe Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited byWilliam. G. Austin, and Stephen Worchel, 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. van Dijk, A. Teun
    2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies11, no2 (December): 115–140. doi:  10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
  82. Weisbrod, Bernd
    2007 “Religious Language of Violence”. InCultures of Violence: Interpersonal violence in a historical perspective, edited byStuart Carroll, 74–75. UK: Palgrave Mcmillian. 10.1057/9780230591820_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591820_3 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19109.sim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.19109.sim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error