1887
image of How is structural inequality made fair in a meritocratic education system?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines how, within the context of meritocracy, a highly differentiated education system can coexist with assertions of equal opportunity. Drawing on the example of Singapore’s education policy texts from 1991 to 2012, the paper exemplifies and expands the analytical potential of a micro-meso-macro movements framework with which to critically engage the discursive role of neo-liberal metaphors in ameliorating the tension of providing ‘equal opportunities’ between students who will undertake the university pathway and those who will have to undergo vocational training. Based on the interconnected discourses of -choice and -skills through a more flexible system, the analytical development of these two simultaneous micro-meso-macro movements demonstrates how the playing field is levelled, and competition for society’s occupations and academic progression is fair even for Vocational and Industrial Training Board Act (VITB) trainees.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20012.tal
2020-12-04
2021-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chomsky, Noam
    2013On anarchism. New York: New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2001Language and power. 2nd ed.Language in Social Life Series. Harlow, Eng.: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2006 “Metapragmatics, hidden assumptions, and moral economy”. AccessedOct 15, 2019. www.academia.edu/3778294/Metapragmatics_hidden_assumptions_and_moral_economy_2006_
  5. 2010Critical discourse analysis: Critical study of language. 2nd ed.Longman Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairclough, Norman , Phil Graham , Jay Lemke , and Ruth Wodak
    2004 “Introduction”. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1): 1–7. doi:  10.1080/17405900410001674489
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674489 [Google Scholar]
  7. Foucault, Michel
    1972The archaeology of knowledge; and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1980Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1982 “The subject and power.” Critical Inquiry8(4): 777–95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1987 “The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984.” Interview by Raúl Fornet-betancourt , Helmut Becker , Alfredo Gomez-müller , and J. D. Gauthier . Philosophy & Social Criticism12 (2–3): 112–31. doi:  10.1177/019145378701200202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019145378701200202 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goh, Chor Boon and Saravanan Gopinathan
    2008 “The development of education in Singapore since 1965”. InToward a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development in Singapore since 1965, edited by Lee Sing Kong , Goh Chor Boon , Birger Fredriksen , and Tan Jee Peng . 12–38. Herndon: World Bank Publications 2008 AccessedOct 15, 2019. documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/121951468302724234/Toward-a-better-future-education-and-training-for-economic-development-in-Singapore-since-1965
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham, Philip
    1999 “Critical systems theory.” Communication Research26(4): 482–507. doi:  10.1177/009365099026004006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004006 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2001 “Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in a new political economy.” Discourse & Society12(6): 761–88. doi:  10.1177/0957926501012006003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Graham, Phil
    2002 “Predication and propagation: A method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy.” Text & Talk22(2): 227–68. doi:  10.1515/text.2002.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.009 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2005a “Analysing policy values in a knowledge economy”. InHandbook on the Knowledge Economy, edited by David Rooney , Greg Hearn , and Abraham Ninan , 118–28. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781845426842.00018
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845426842.00018 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2005bHypercapitalism: New media, Language and Social Perceptions of Value. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007 “Critical discourse analysis and evaluative meaning: Interdisciplinary as a critical turn”. InCritical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, edited by Ruth Wodak and Gilbert Weiss , 110–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham, Phil , and Allan Luke
    2011 “Critical discourse analysis and political economy of communication: Understanding the new corporate order.” Cultural Politics7(1): 103–32. doi:  10.2752/175174311X12861940861824
    https://doi.org/10.2752/175174311X12861940861824 [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K. , and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lemke, Jay L.
    1995Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Critical Perspectives on Literacy and Education. London; Bristol, Pa.: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1998 “Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics”. Functions of Language5(1): 33–56. doi:  10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem [Google Scholar]
  22. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 1991aUpgrading vocational training/ Vocational and Industrial Training Board. Singapore: The Board.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 1991bImproving Primary School Education: Report of the Review Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2002 “Report of the Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Committee”. AccessedJan 8, 2015. www3.moe.edu.sg/jcreview/JC_Upp_Sec_Review_Report.pdf
  25. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2006 “Report of the Polytechnic-School Review Committee”. AccessedJan 8, 2015. www3.moe.edu.sg/corporate/pdf/psrc-report.pdf
  26. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2008 “Report of the Committee on the Expansion of the University Sector. Greater Choice, More Room to Excel: Final Report”. AccessedJan 8, 2015. www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/files/2008/08/ceus-final-report-and-exec-summary.pdf
  27. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2012 “Report of the Committee on University Education Pathways Beyond 2015 (CUEP). Greater Diversity, More Opportunities: Final Report”. AccessedJan 8, 2015. www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/files/2012/08/cuep-report-greater-diversity-more-opportunities.pdf
  28. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2018 “Secondary School Education. Shaping the Next Phase of Your Child’s Learning Journey”. AccessedOct 11, 2020. https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/secondary/files/secondary-school-education-booklet.pdf
  29. Mulderrig, Jane
    2003 “Consuming education: A critical discourse analysis of social actors in New Labour’s education policy”. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies1(1): 96–123. www.jceps.com/archives/398
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2007 “Textual strategies of representation and legitimation in New Labour policy discourse”. InRenewing Dialogues in Marxism and Education: Openings, 1st ed., edited by Anthony Green , Glenn Rikowski , and H. Raduntz . 135–50. Marxism and Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US: Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230609679_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230609679_8 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 “Using keywords analysis in CDA: Evolving discourses of the knowledge economy in education”. InEducation and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Vol.24, edited by Bob Jessop , Norman Fairclough , and Ruth Wodak . 149–70. Educational Futures. Rotterdam [u.a.]: Sense Publ.. 10.1163/9789087906245_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087906245_009 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009The Language of Education Policy: From Thatcher to Blair. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2012 “The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy.” Discourse & Society23(6): 701–28. doi:  10.1177/0957926512455377
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512455377 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicoll, Katherine
    1998 ““Fixing” the “facts”: Flexible learning as policy invention.” Higher Education Research & Development17(3): 291–304. doi:  10.1080/0729436980170303
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170303 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2006Flexibility and Lifelong Learning: Policy, Discourse and Politics. London; New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203969441
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969441 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nietzsche, Friedrich
    1967The Will to Power. Translated by Walter Kaufmann and Reginald John Hollingdale . New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sen, Amartya
    1992Inequality Reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Oxford England: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Talib, Nadira
    2019 “Creating the conditions for human division and structural inequality. The foundation of Singapore’s education policy.” Journal of Language and Politics18(5): 739–59. doi:  10.1075/jlp.18070.tal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18070.tal [Google Scholar]
  39. 2020Is it time to let meritocracy go? Examining the case of Singapore. Abingdon, Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780429453625
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453625 [Google Scholar]
  40. Talib, Nadira , and Richard Fitzgerald
    2015 “Inequality as meritocracy. The use of the metaphor of diversity and the value of inequality within Singapore’s meritocratic education system.” Critical Discourse Studies12(4): 445–62. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2015.1034740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1034740 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2016 “Micro-meso-macro movements; a multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts.” Critical Discourse Studies13(5): 531–47. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2018 “Putting philosophy back to work in critical discourse analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies15(2): 123–39. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2017.1421242
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1421242 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wong, Aline
    2000Keynote address by Dr Aline Wong, Senior Minister of State for Education, Ministry of Education, Singapore, at the International Baccalaureate (IB) Asia-Pacific 16th annual regional conference on curriculum, assessment and cultural equity to be held on Friday, 24 November 2000, at 9.15 am at the Raffles City Convention Centre: Education in a multicultural setting—The Singapore experience. AccessedJan 15, 2019. www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/view-html?filename=2000112401.htm
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20012.tal
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error