1887
image of Working Royals, Megxit and Prince Andrew’s disastrous BBC interview
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This research incorporates Corpus Linguistic techniques with the socio-cognitive approach (SCA) to Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) to analyse the discursive representation of the British Monarchy (BM) through the categorisation of its individual members within the Now Corpus from 2010–2020. Analysis concentrated on their categorisation around key events over the ten-year period, most notably the accusations that Prince Andrew had sexual relations with a minor and Prince Harry’s and Meghan Markle’s decision to relinquish their roles within the Monarchy. Significantly, the Royals were positively represented through the affixation of agency and active form to attach them to positive actions, for instance, performing work and charity related duties. Negativity was deemphasised via the removal of agency, passive use and a refocus onto less serious acts which distanced them, particularly the Queen and Prince Andrew, from scandal.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20020.chi
2020-11-10
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abell, Jackie, and Clifford Stevenson
    2011 “Defending the faith (s)? Democracy and hereditary right in England”. Political Psychology32 (1): 485–504. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2010.00813.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00813.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Augoustinos, Martha, Iain Walker and Ngaire Donaghue
    2014Social cognition: An integrated introduction. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press”. Discourse & society19 (3): 273–306. doi:  10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann
    1996The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boshoff, Alison [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairclough, Norman
    2013 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Inthe Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, edited byJames P. Gee, and Michael Handford, 9–20. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fullfact
    Fullfact 2018 “How does the royal family make money?” AccessedJanuary 6, 2020. https://fullfact.org/economy/royal-family-what-are-costs-and-benefits/
  8. Gabrielatos, Costas
    2007 “Selecting query terms to build a specialised corpus from a restricted- access database.” ICAME journal31: 5–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, Matthew
    2011Political traditions and UK politics. Springer. 10.1057/9780230336827
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230336827 [Google Scholar]
  10. Harvey, David
    2007A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harvey, Laura, Kim Allen, and Heather Mendick
    2015 “Extraordinary acts and ordinary pleasures: Rhetorics of inequality in young people’s talk about celebrity.” Discourse & society26 (4): 428–444. 10.1177/0957926515576636
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515576636 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hart, Christopher
    2010Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Springer. 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 “Moving beyond metaphor in the cognitive linguistic approach to CDA.” Critical discourse studies in context and cognition43: 171–192. 10.1075/dapsac.43.09har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43.09har [Google Scholar]
  14. Heimbrod, Camille
    2019 “Why Prince Andrew’s ‘Unprecedented’ Interview Could ‘Come Back to Haunt Him’.” International Business Times, November 17, 2019. https://www.ibtimes.com/why-prince-andrews-unprecedented-interview-could-come-back-haunt-him-2868040
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hodge, Margaret
    2014 “Queen not served well by Royal Household and Treasury.” AccessedApril 20, 2020. https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-accounts-committee/news/sovereign-grant-report/
  16. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    2014Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Trade.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Littler, Jo
    2017Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and myths of mobility. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315712802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712802 [Google Scholar]
  18. Maclaran, Pauline, Cele Otnes, and Eileen Fischer
    2008 “Maintaining the myth of the monarchy: how producers shape consumers’ experiences of the British royal family”. ACR North American Advances.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Moscovici, Serge
    1961La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psychoanalysis, its image and its public]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1984 “The phenomenon of social representations.” Social representations: 3–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ONS
  22. Oxfam
    Oxfam 2013 “The True cost of austerity and inequality.” AccessedJune 22, 2020. https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/cs-true-cost-austerity-inequality-uk-120913-en_0.pdf
  23. Palmer, Catherine
    2007 “‘Just Like Our Family’: Royalty, national Identity and Tourism.” InRoyal Tourism: Excursions Around Monarchy, edited byPhilip Long and Nicola J. Palmer, 194–213. Clevedon: Channel View Publications Ltd. 10.21832/9781845410827‑012
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410827-012 [Google Scholar]
  24. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The discourse historical approach.” Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis: 87–121. London, Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Repo, Jemima, and Riina Yrjölä
    2015 “‘We’re all princesses now’: Sex, class, and neoliberal governmentality in the rise of middle-class monarchy”. European Journal of Cultural Studies18 (6): 741–760. doi:  10.1177/1367549415572320
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415572320 [Google Scholar]
  26. Richardson, John
    2006Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Scott, Jennifer
    2019 “Election debate: five things from Johnson v Corbyn head to head.” The BBC, November 19, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50481167
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sovereign report
    Sovereign report 2018–2019 “The Sovereign Grant and Sovereign Grant Reserve.” AccessedMay 15, 2020. https://www.royal.uk/sites/default/files/media/final_sovereign_grant_for_website.pdf
  29. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 “Political discourse and racism: Describing others in Western parliaments.” The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse2: 31–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2003 “The discourse-knowledge interface.” InCritical discourse analysis, 85–109. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2009 “Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach.” Methods of critical discourse analysis2 (1): 62–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013News as discourse. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203062784
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062784 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2014 “Discourse, Knowledge and social cognition.” InDiscourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach: 94–114. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wagner, Wolfgang, and Nicky Hayes
    2005Everyday discourse and common sense: The theory of social representations. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07263‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07263-4 [Google Scholar]
  35. Widholm, Andreas, and Karin Becker
    2015 “Celebrating with the celebrities: television in public space during two royal weddings.” Celebrity Studies6 (1): 6–22. doi:  10.1080/19392397.2015.995897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2015.995897 [Google Scholar]
  36. YouGov
    YouGov 2019 “Do you support or oppose these changes (no fault divorce)?” AccessedJune 1, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/education/survey-results/daily/2019/04/09/b66e4/1
  37. YouGov
    YouGov 2020 “Do you think that Britain should continue to have a monarchy, or not?” AccessedMay 25, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/travel/survey-results/daily/2020/02/18/8b405/1
  38. You gov
    You gov 2020 “Do you support or oppose the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s (Harry & Meghan’s) decision to “step back” from their roles in the Royal Family?” AccessedMay 25, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/survey-results/daily/2020/01/09/f8082/1
  39. YouGov
    YouGov 2020 “What Great Britain thinks of Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.” AccessedMay 25, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/explore/public_figure/Meghan_Duchess_of_Sussex
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20020.chi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20020.chi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error