Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



We investigated how two English-language newspapers – Hong Kong’s (SCMP) and the mainland (CD) – portrayed key social actors (police, students, protesters, and governments) during the Occupy Central/Yellow Umbrella movement. We examined emotional valence, arousal, and dominance characterizations in 1,180 news articles via a multilevel, multivariate outcome regression and critical discourse analysis. The findings reveal that emotional sentiments associated with students and protesters in SCMP were generally more positive than in CD but that this was reversed for the police and the government. Whereas SCMP deployed personal stories to construct a humanized image of protesters and students, CD relied on expert authority, rhetorical questions, and imagined scenarios to convey empathy towards Hong Kong residents, creating a villainized image of protesters. Our mixed-methods approach reveals how SCMP and CD portrayed students differently via the discursive frames of “optimistic dreamers” and “powerless scapegoats,” respectively.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baldwin, Clare, and James Pomfret
    2014 “Hong Kong Students to Boycott Class to Protest China Curbs on Democracy.” Reuters, September 21, 2014. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-hongkong-china/hong-kong-students-to-boycott-class-to-protest-china-curbs-on-democracy-idUKKBN0HF0MN20140920
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barboza, David
    2015 “Alibaba Buying South China Morning Post, Aiming to Influence Media.” The New York Times, December 11, 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/12/business/dealbook/alibaba-scmp-south-china-morning-post.html
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, Samuel
    2019 “Values as Tools of Legitimation in EU and UK Brexit Discourses.” InDiscourses of Brexit, ed. byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 17–31. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamini, Yoav, Abba M. Krieger, and Daniel Yekutieli
    2006 “Adaptive Linear Step-Up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika93 (3): 491–507. 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertsekas, Dimitri P.
    2014Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhatia, Aditi
    2016 “Discursive Construction of the ‘Key’ Moment in the Umbrella Movement.” Journal of Language and Politics15 (5): 551–568. 10.1075/jlp.15.5.03bha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.03bha [Google Scholar]
  7. Brady, Anne-Marie
    2008Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradley, Tamsin
    2009 “Religion and Globalisation.” Globalizations6 (2): 265–279. 10.1080/14747730902854208
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730902854208 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cabalin, Cristian
    2014 “The Conservative Response to the 2011 Chilean Student Movement.” Discourse35 (4): 485–498.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana B., and Mercedes Díez-Prados
    2014 “Positive Self-Evaluation versus Negative Other-Evaluation in the Political Genre of Pre-Election Debates.” Discourse & Society25 (2): 159–185. 10.1177/0957926513515601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513515601 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ceron, Andrea, Luigi Curini, and Stefano M. Iacus
    2016 “First-and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics13(2): 159–174. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266 [Google Scholar]
  12. China Daily
    China Daily 2017 “About Us: China Daily’s Print Media.” China Daily. AccessedJanuary 31, 2020, www.chinadaily.com.cn/static_e/printmedia.html
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Xinran Andy
    2016 “Cultural Framing in Social Movements.” Virginia Review of Asian Studies18: 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fendler, Lynn
    2006 “Others and the Problem of Community.” Curriculum Inquiry36 (3): 303–326. 10.1111/j.1467‑873X.2006.00360.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00360.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Flowerdew, John
    2016 “A Historiographical Approach to Hong Kong Occupy.” Journal of Language and Politics15 (5): 527–548. 10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo [Google Scholar]
  16. Flowerdew, John, David C. S. Li, and Sarah Tran
    2002 “Discriminatory News Discourse.” Discourse & Society13 (3): 319–345. 10.1177/0957926502013003052
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003052 [Google Scholar]
  17. Galtung, Johan, and Mari Ruge
    1973 “Structuring and Selecting News.” InThe Manufacture of News, ed. byStanley Cohen, and Jock Young, 62–72. London: Constable.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldstein, Harvey
    2011Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Griffiths, James
    2014 “Occupy Central Goes Global.” South China Morning Post, September 30, 2014. www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1604522/occupy-central-goes-global-solidarity-protests-planned-dozens-cities
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Haigh, Maria, Thomas Haigh, and Nadine I. Kozak
    2018 “Stopping Fake News.” Journalism Studies19 (14): 2062–2087. 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1316681
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1316681 [Google Scholar]
  21. Henley, Jon
    2014 “How the Umbrella Became a Symbol of the Hong Kong Democracy Protests.” The Guardian, September 29, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/29/umbrella-symbol-hong-kong-democracy-protests
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hollander, Barry A.
    1996 “Talk Radio.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73 (1): 102–113. 10.1177/107769909607300110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300110 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kennedy, Peter
    2008A Guide to Econometrics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Khosravinik, Majid
    2009 “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers during the Balkan Conflict (1999) and the British General Election (2005).” Discourse & Society20 (4): 477–498. 10.1177/0957926509104024
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024 [Google Scholar]
  25. Konstantopoulos, Spyros
    2008 “The Power of the Test in Three-Level Cluster Randomized Designs.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness1 (1): 66–88. 10.1080/19345740701692522
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740701692522 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kottasova, Ivana
    2015 “Alibaba buys South China Morning Post.” CNN Business, December 11, 2015. https://money.cnn.com/2015/12/11/media/alibaba-south-china-morning-post/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, George
    1991 “Metaphor and War.” Peace Research23, 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, Chin Chuan
    2010 “Bound to rise: Chinese media discourses on the new global order.” InReorienting global communication: Indian and Chinese media beyond borders, ed. byMichael Curtin, and Shah Hemant, 260–283. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, Lihua
    2010Interpersonal Rhetoric in the Editorials of China Daily. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MacKinnon, David P., Chondra M. Lockwood, and Jason Williams
    2004 “Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect.” Multivariate Behavioral Research39 (1): 99–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
    1988 “Rhetorical Structure Theory.” Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse8 (3): 243–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, Denis-Constant
    1995 “The Choices of Identity.” Social Identities1 (1): 5–20. 10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423 [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.
    2005The Language of Evaluation. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mey, Jacob L., and Hans J. Ladegaard
    2015 “Discourse, Democracy and Diplomacy.” Word61 (4): 319–334. 10.1080/00437956.2015.1112949
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2015.1112949 [Google Scholar]
  35. Miglbauer, Marlene, and Veronika Koller
    2019 “The British people have spoken” InDiscourses of Brexit, ed. byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 86–103. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Musolff, Andreas
    2017 “Metaphor, Irony and Sarcasm in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics109: 95–104. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Naeem, Waqasia, and Muhammad Shaban Rafi
    2019 “Linguistic Realization of Legitimation of Power by Zia ul Haq and Pervez Musharraf during the Afghanistan Wars.” Journal of Political Studies26 (1): 31–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nightingale, Alastair, Michael Quayle, and Orla Muldoon
    2017 “It’s just heart breaking: Doing Inclusive Political Solidarity or Ambivalent Paternalism through Sympathetic Discourse within the ‘Refugee Crisis’ Debate.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology27 (2): 13–146. 10.1002/casp.2303
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2303 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nuolijärvi, Pirkko, and Liisa Tiittula
    2011 “Irony in Political Television Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (2): 572–587. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019 [Google Scholar]
  40. Öztürk, Nazan, and Serkan Ayvaz
    2018 “Sentiment Analysis on Twitter.” Telematics and Informatics35 (1): 136–147. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Phillips, Tom
    2016 “Mysterious Confession Fuels Fears of Beijing’s Influence on Hong Kong’s Top Newspaper.” The Guardian, July 25, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/25/south-china-morning-post-china-influence-hong-kong-newspaper-confession
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.), ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimation in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society22 (6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  44. Richardson, John
    2007Analyzing Newspapers. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑20968‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 [Google Scholar]
  45. Scott, Mike
    2015WordSmith Tools (Version 6) Online manual. Lexically. Accessed20 August, 2019. lexically.net/downloads/version6/HTML/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  46. SCMP Reporter
    SCMP Reporter 2015 “SCMP wins eight Human Rights Press Awards.” South China Morning Post, 10 May, 2015. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1791698/scmp-wins-eight-human-rights-press-awards
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Torfing, Jacob
    1999New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vaara, Eero
    2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis.” Discourse & Society25 (4): 500–518. 10.1177/0957926514536962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962 [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1996 “Power and the News Media.” InPolitical Communication in Action, ed. byDavid L. Paletz, 9–36. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 1998Ideology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition.” InPolitics as Text and Talk, ed. byPaul A. Chilton, and Christina Schäffner, 203–237. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  52. Van Leeuwen, Theo A.
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication1 (1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2008Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Warriner, Amy Beth, Victor Kuperman, and Marc Brysbaert
    2013 “Norms of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 13,915 English Lemmas.” Behavior Research Methods45 (4): 1191–1207. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0314‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x [Google Scholar]
  55. Wenzl, Nora
    2019 “This is about the kind of Britain we are.” InDiscourses of Brexit, ed. byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 32–47. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-3 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and K. Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Yin, Liangen, and Wang Haiyan
    2010 “People-centred myth: Representation of the Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily.” Discourse & Communication4 (4): 383–398. 10.1177/1750481310381581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310381581 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zappavigna, Michele
    2019 “Ambient Affiliation and #Brexit.” InDiscourses of Brexit, ed. byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 48–68. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-4 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error