Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks

References

1. Aboelezz, Mariam
   2014 “The Geosemiotics of Tahrir Square: A Study of the Relationship between Discourse and Space.” Journal of Language and Politics13(4): 599–622. 10.1075/jlp.13.1.02abo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.02abo [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, Allan
   1984 “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society13(2): 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
3. Bell, Allan
   1990 “Audience and Referee Design in New Zealand Media Language.” InNew Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. byAllan Bell, and Janet Holmes, 165–194. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blommaert, Jan
   2013 Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Toronto: Multilingual matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
5. Chang, Hsiao-Chuan
   2013 “Housing Affordability in Macao: Evidence and Policy.” China Economic Journal6(1): 46–56. 10.1080/17538963.2013.831235
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2013.831235 [Google Scholar]
6. Christiansen, Jonathan
   2009 “Four Stages of Social Movements.” Research Starters, 1–7.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Flesher Fominaya, Cristina
   2010 “Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates.” Sociology Compass4 (6): 393–404. 10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2010.00287.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x [Google Scholar]
8. Goffman, Erving
   1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goodwin, Jeff, and James M. Jasper
   2015 “Editors’ Introduction”. InThe Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, ed. byJeff Goodwin, and James M. Jasper, 5–8. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gross, Daniel, and Timothy Gross
    1993 “Tagging: Changing Visual Patterns and the Rhetorical Implications of a New Form of Graffiti.” A Review of General Semantics50(3): 251–264.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hanauer, David I.
    2004 “Silence, Voice and Erasure: Psychological Embodiment in Graffiti at the Site of Prime Minister Rabin’s Assassination.” The Arts in Psychotherapy31: 29–35. 10.1016/j.aip.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
12. Hanauer, David I.
    2011 “The Discursive Construction of the Separation Wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics10(3): 301–321. 10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han [Google Scholar]
13. Hanauer, David I.
    2015 “Occupy Baltimore: A Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Participatory Social Contestation in an American City.” InConflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape, ed. byRani Rubdy, and Selim Ben Said, 207–222. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137426284_10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426284_10 [Google Scholar]
14. Haugh, Michael
    2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics58: 52–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Karlander, David
    2019 “A Semiotics of Nonexistence? Erasure and Erased Writing under Anti-graffiti Regimes.” Linguistic Landscape5(2):198–216. 10.1075/ll.18023.kar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.18023.kar [Google Scholar]
16. Kasanga, Luanga A.
    2014 “The Linguistic Landscape: Mobile Signs, Code Choice, Symbolic Meaning and Territoriality in the Discourse of Protest.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language230: 19–44. 10.1515/ijsl‑2014‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0025 [Google Scholar]
17. Kim, Sungwoo, and In Chull Jang
    2020 “A Trajectory of a Mediational Means in Protest: The Hand Placard in South Korea’s Candlelight Protests.” Social Semiotics. OnlineFirst. doi:  10.1080/10350330.2020.1730555
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1730555 [Google Scholar]
18. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. byPaul Drew, and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lou, Jackie, and Adam Jaworski
    2016 “Itineraries of Protest Signage: Semiotic Landscape and the Mythologizing of the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement.” Journal of Language and Politics15 (5): 612–645. 10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.06lou [Google Scholar]
20. Martín Rojo, Luisa
    2014 “Occupy: The Spatial Dynamics of Discourse in Global Protest Movements.” Journal of Language and Politics13(4): 583–598. 10.1075/jlp.13.4.01mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.01mar [Google Scholar]
21. McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald
    2015 “Social Movement Organizations.” InThe Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts, ed. byJeff Goodwin, and James M. Jasper, 159–174. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Scollon, Ron
    2001 Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Scollon, Ron, and Suzie W. Scollon
    2004 Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203694343
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343 [Google Scholar]
24. Seloni, Lisya, and Yusuf Sarfati
    2017 “Linguistic Landscape of Gezi Park Protests in Turkey: A Discourse Analysis of Graffiti.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (6): 782–808. 10.1075/jlp.15037.sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15037.sel [Google Scholar]
25. Shavit, Nimrod, and Benjamin H. Bailey
    2015 “Between the Procedural and the Substantial: Democratic Deliberation and the Interaction Order in ‘Occupy Middletown General Assembly’.” Symbolic Interaction38(1): 103–126. 10.1002/symb.141
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.141 [Google Scholar]
26. Sheng, Ni, U-Wa Tang, and Adam Grydehøj
    2017 “Urban Morphology and Urban Fragmentation in Macau, China: Island City Development in the Pearl River Delta Megacity Region.” Island Studies Journal12(2): 199–212. 10.24043/isj.25
    https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.25 [Google Scholar]
27. Steinberg, Rebecca Lila
    2014 “The Occupy Assembly: Discursive Experiments in Direct Democracy.” Journal of Language and Politics13(4): 702–731. 10.1075/jlp.13.4.06ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.06ste [Google Scholar]
28. Waldner, Lisa K., and Betty A. Dobratz
    2013 “Graffiti as a Form of Contentious Political Participation.” Sociology Compass7(5): 377–389. 10.1111/soc4.12036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12036 [Google Scholar]
29. Wee, Lionel
    2016 “Situating Affect in Linguistic Landscapes.” Linguistic Landscape2(2): 105–126. 10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.01wee [Google Scholar]
30. Zaimakis, Yiannis
    2015 “Welcome to the Civilization of Fear’: On Political Graffiti Heterotopias in Greece in Times of Crisis.” Visual Communication14(4): 373–396. 10.1177/1470357215593845
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215593845 [Google Scholar]
31. Zhang, Hong, and Brian Hok-Shing Chan
    2017 “The Shaping of a Multilingual Landscape by Shop Names: Tradition versus Modernity.” Language and Intercultural Communication17(1): 26–44. 10.1080/14708477.2017.1261674
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1261674 [Google Scholar]
32. Zhang, Hong, and Brian Hok-Shing Chan
    2020 “Differentiating Graffiti in Macao: Activity Types, Multimodality and Institutional Appropriation.” To appear inVisual Communication. doi:  10.1177/1470357220966737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220966737 [Google Scholar]