1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

‘Populism’ has become ever more ubiquitous in political analysis, to the extent that ‘populism studies’ appears on course to establishing itself as a field of research in its own right. This article warns about the dangers of such a development. Taking a discourse theoretical approach as our starting point – but also critically engaging with this tradition’s contribution to the hype about populism – we suggest that ‘populism studies’ (and the preoccupation with populism this field embodies) risks reifying populism by focusing on populism as a ‘as such’, and through an over-reliance on the of populism to approach that phenomenon. This, we argue, hampers a nuanced and contextualized understanding of the exact role populism plays in different populist politics. This is not a call for abandoning the concept of populism altogether, but a call for de-centring the concept and for moving beyond academia’s ‘populist moment’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20044.dec
2020-12-14
2021-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akkerman, Tjitske, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove
    2014 “How Populist are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters.” Comparative Political Studies47 (9): 1324–1353. doi:  10.1177/0010414013512600
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkerman, Tjitske
    2017 “Populism is overrated – if there is a threat to democacy, it’s from authoritarian nationalism.” 31July 2017 blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/31/populism-is-overrated-if-there-is-a-threat-to-democracy-its-from-authoritarian-nationalism/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anastasiou, Michaelangelo
    2019 “Of Nation and People: The Discursive Logic of Nationalist Populism.” Javnost – The Public26 (3): 330–45. doi:  10.1080/13183222.2019.1606562
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1606562 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cannon, Barry
    2018 “Must We Talk about Populism? Interrogating Populism’s Conceptual Utility in a Context of Crisis.” New Political Science40 (3): 477–96. doi:  10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1487187 [Google Scholar]
  5. Csigó, Péter
    2016The Neo-Popular Bubble. Speculating on the People in Late Modernity. Budapest: CEU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Collovald, Annie
    2004Le Populisme du FN: Un Dangereux Contresens. Savoir-agir, Bellecombeen-Bauges: Editions du Croquant.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dean, Jonathan, and Bice Maiguashca
    2020 “Did Somebody Say Populism? Towards a Renewal and Reorientation of Populism Studies.” Journal of Political Ideologies25(1): 11–27. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712kata
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712kata [Google Scholar]
  8. De Cleen, Benjamin
    2017 “Populism and nationalism.” InHandbook of Populism, edited byCristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo and Pierre Ostiguy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 342–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, and Aurelien Mondon
    2018 “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement.” Organization25 (5): 649–61. doi:  10.1177/1350508418768053
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418768053 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2021 “Populist Politics and the Politics of ‘Populism’: The Radical Right in Western Europe.” InPopulism in Global Perspective A Performative and Discursive Approach, edited byPierre Ostiguy, Francisco Panizza, and Benjamin Moffitt. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and Articulations. A Discourse-Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost – The Public24(4): 301–319. doi:  10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Eramo, Marco
    2013 “Populism and the New Oligarchy.” New Left Review82. Retrieved fromhttps://newleftreview.org/issues/II82/articles/marco-d-eramo-populism-and-the-new-oligarchy
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Freeden, Michael
    2017 “After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies22 (1): 1–11. doi:  10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813 [Google Scholar]
  14. Glynos, Jason, and Aurelien Mondon
    2016 “The political logic of populist hype: The Case of Right-wing populism’s ‘meteoric rise’ and its relation to the status quo.” POPULISMUS Working Paper Seriesnr. 4. Downloaded fromwww.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/WP4-glynos-mondon-final-upload.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goyvaerts, Jana and Benjamin De Cleen
    2020 “Media, Anti-populist Discourse and the Dynamics of the Populism Debate.” InPerspectives on Populism and the Media, ed. ByBenjamin Krämer and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 83–108. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. 10.5771/9783845297392‑83
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297392-83 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jäger, Anton
    2017 “The Semantic Drift: Images of Populism in Post-war American Historiography and Their Relevance for (European) Political Science.” Constellations24 (3): 310–323. doi:  10.1111/1467‑8675.12308
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12308 [Google Scholar]
  17. Katsambekis, Giorgos
    2017 “The Populist Surge in Post-Democratic Times: Theoretical and Political Challenges.” The Political Quarterly88 (2): 202–10. doi:  10.1111/1467‑923X.12317
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12317 [Google Scholar]
  18. Laclau, Ernesto
    1977Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. London: New Left Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005aOn Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005b “Populism: What’s in a Name?” InPopulism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited byFrancisco Panizza, 32–49. London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maiguashca, Bice
    2019 “Resisting the ‘Populist Hype’: A Feminist Critique of a Globalising Concept.” Review of International Studies, September, 1–18. doi:  10.1017/S0260210519000299
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000299 [Google Scholar]
  23. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2015 “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition50 (2): 189–217. doi:  10.1017/gov.2014.13
    https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.13 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mondon, Aurelien
    2017 “Limiting democratic horizons to a nationalist reaction: populism, the radical right and the working class.” Javnost – The Public24(4): 355–374. doi:  10.1080/13183222.2017.1330085
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330085 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mouffe, Chantal
    2018For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mudde, Cas
    (2017a) “Why Nativism, Not Populism, Should be Declared Word of the Year.” The Guardian, 7December 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/dec/07/cambridge-dictionary-nativism-populism-word-year
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017b “We are Thinking about Populism Wrong. And it’s Costing Us.” Huffington Post, 20March 2017 https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/populism-wrong_cost_us_58cfeb03e4b0be71dcf63e6c
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
    2017Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018 “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693. doi:  10.1177/0010414018789490
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rooduijn, Matthijs
    2019 “State of the field: How to Study Populism and Adjacent Topics? A Plea for Both More and Less Focus.” European Journal of Political Research58(1): 362–372. doi:  10.1111/1475‑6765.12314
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rydgren, Jens
    2017 “Radical Right-Wing Parties in Europe: What’s Populism Got to Do with It?” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 485–96. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17024.ryd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17024.ryd [Google Scholar]
  32. Stanley, Ben
    2008 “The Thin Ideology of Populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies13 (1) 95–110. doi:  10.1080/13569310701822289
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgios Katsambekis
    2014 “Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of Syriza.” Journal of Political Ideologies19 (2): 119–142. doi:  10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Thomas Siomos, and Nikos Nikisianis
    2016 “Contemporary Left-wing Populism in Latin America: Leadership, Horizontalism, and Post-democracy in Chávez’s Venezuela.” Latin American Politics and Society58 (3): 51–76. doi:  10.1111/j.1548‑2456.2016.00318.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00318.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2017a “Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 523–534. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17025.sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta [Google Scholar]
  36. 2017b “How Did Populism Become a Pejorative Concept? And Why is This Important Today? A Genealogy of Double Hermeneutics.” POPULISMUS Working PapersNo.6. Available at: www.populismus.gr/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/stavrakakis-populismus-wp-6-upload.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Thomas Siomos, and Nikos Nikisianis
    2017 “Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: revisiting a reified association.” Critical Discourse Studies14 (4): 420–439. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Nikos Nikisianis, and Thomas Siomos
    2018 “Populism, Anti-Populism and Crisis.” Contemporary Political Theory17 (1): 4–27. doi:  10.1057/s41296‑017‑0142‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0142-y [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomassen, Lasse
    2016 “Hegemony, Populism and Democracy: Laclau and Mouffe Today (review article).” Revista Española de Ciencia Política40: 161–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zúquete, José Pedro
    2018 “From Left to Right and Beyond: The Defense of Populism.” InRoutledge Handbook of Global Populism, ed. byCarlos de la Torre, 430–448. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20044.dec
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse theory; populism; populism studies
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error