1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Discourse theorists often defend their discursive stance on ‘reality’ and the material with reference to Laclau and Mouffe’s quote that, while an “earthquake or the falling of a brick…exist externally to thought,” they cannot “constitute themselves as objects outside any discursive conditions of emergence”.

While fully endorsing this statement, we argue that it does not licence discourse theorists to consider discursive formations divorced from their material context, but obliges us to account for the constraints and affordances of the material conditions on the structuring of the discursive field itself. Drawing on previous work, we argue that material conditions may render discourse systems , such that they cannot be articulated through chains of equivalence within a radically restructured field. We suggest as a way forward the concept of the continually traversing between in order to reconfigure and renegotiate key signifiers within the materially-constrained discursive fields of each.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20046.bar
2020-12-14
2021-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict
    1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartlett, Tom
    2019 “Scaling the Incommensurate: Discourses of sustainability in the Western Isles of Scotland.” InCritical Policy Discourse Analysis, edited by Nicolina Montesano Montessori , Jane Mulderrig and Michael J. Farrelly , 242–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781788974967.00016
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974967.00016 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 “Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Towards scalar supervenience?” InRoutledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by Tom Bartlett and Gerard O’Grady , 375–390. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315413891
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2012Hybrid Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203109373
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109373 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartlett, Tom , Nicolina Montesano Montessori , and Harriet Lloyd
    2017 “Contesting Key Terms and Concepts in the Civil Sphere”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Language Awareness, edited by Peter Garrett and Josep Cots . London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676494‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676494-30 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan
    2015 “Chronotopes, Scales, and Complexity in the Study of Language in Society.” Annual Review of Anthropology44: 105–116. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑102214‑014035
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2007 “Sociolinguistic Scales.” Intercultural Pragmatics4 (1): 1–19. 10.1515/IP.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brennan, Ruth
    2015 What Lies Beneath: Probing the Cultural Depths of a Nature Conservation Conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland. University of Aberdeen. Unpublished PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Buell, Frederick
    2012 “A Short History of Oil Cultures: Or, the Marriage of Catastrophe and Exuberance.” Journal of American Studies46: 273–293. 10.1017/S0021875812000102
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875812000102 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carpentier, Nico
    2017 “Discourse-Theoretical Analysis (DTA).” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson , 272–284. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑19
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-19 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deleuze, Gilles , and Félix Guattari
    1987 (trsl B. Massumi ) [1980] A Thousand Plateaus. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Errejón, Iñigon and Chantal Mouffe
    2016Podemos: In the Name of the People. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman
    2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FishUpdate
    FishUpdate 2013 “Dismay at Barra Conservation Outcome.” 14July 2013 https://www.fishupdate.com/dismay-at-barra-conservation-outcome-fishupdate-com/
  15. Foucault, Michel
    1971L’ordre du disours. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Halcrow Group Limited
    Halcrow Group Limited 2010Impact Assessment of the Proposed Designation of Two Inshore Special Areas of Conservation in the Sound of Barra and East Mingulay. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available online fromwww.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/295194/0106277.pdf [accessed27 April 2015].
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harvey, David
    1996Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HIE
    HIE 2014Highlands and Islands Enterprise. The Outer Hebrides. Available online fromwww.hie.co.uk/regional-information/area-information/outerhebrides/overview.html [accessed27 April 2015].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Howarth, D.
    1998 “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” InResearch Strategies in the Social Sciences, edited by Elinor Scarborough and Eric Tanenbaum , 268–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198292376.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198292376.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marine Scotland Communications
    Marine Scotland Communications 2014 “Barra Step Forward for Community Management of SAC.” February20 2014 https://blogs.gov.scot/marine-scotland/2014/02/20/barra-step-forward-for-community-management-of-sac/
  23. Montesano Montessori, Nicolina
    2011 “The Design of a Theoretical, Methodological, Analytical Framework to Analyse Hegemony in Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies8 (3): 169–182. 10.1080/17405904.2011.586221
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.586221 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mouffe, Chantal
    2018For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2014 “Agonistic Democracy and Radical Politics.” Pavillionpavilionmagazine.org/chantal-mouffe-agonistic-democracy-and-radical-politics/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1994 “For a Politics of Nomadic Identity.” InTravellers’ Tales, edited by George Robertson , 105–113. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Scottish Natural Heritage
    Scottish Natural Heritage. n.d. “Protecting Scotland’s Nature: Protected Areas”. www.snh.gov.uk/protecting-scotlands-nature/protected-areas/international-designations/sac/marine-sacs/
  29. Thibault, Paul J.
    1997Re-Reading Saussure: The Dynamics of Signs in Social Life. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tomasello, Michael
    2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Torfing, Jacob
    1999New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Whitehead, Alfred North
    1978 (1929)Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20046.bar
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse , equivalence , incommensurability , rhizome and sustainability
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error