1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Within post-structuralist discourse theory, there has been an ongoing interest in fantasy and the fantasmatic logic. We propose a new way forward and suggest a focus on fantasies of ‘nature’ and what is deemed ‘natural’. Fantasies are structurally entwined with language, desire, and political ontologies. Discourses of nature hold a privileged position in this entwinement. We use the psychoanalytic concept of fantasy to explore how symbolic engagement with the world is supported by fantasmatic mechanisms. We argue that political fantasies express political subjects and objects via the imaginary mechanisms of splitting and projection. In an era of ecological crises and global pandemics, we find that fantasies that create a split between nature and society are a central part of the transformation of political imaginaries and discourses. Studying fantasies of various “naturecultures” and the politics of nature is thus an important new direction for discourse theory to explore anti-essentialist ontologies.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20049.beh
2020-12-18
2025-01-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20049.beh
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agrawal, Arun
    2005 “Environmentality: Community, Intimate Government, and the Making of Environmental Subjects In Kumaon, India.” Current Anthropology46 (2): 161–190. 10.1086/427122
     https://doi.org/10.1086/427122 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arfi, Badredine
    2010 “Fantasy in the Discourse of ‘Social Theory of International Politics’.” Cooperation and Conflict45 (4): 428–448. 10.1177/0010836710387098
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836710387098 [Google Scholar]
  3. Behagel, Jelle Hendrik , Bas Arts , and Esther Turnhout
    2019 “Beyond Argumentation: A Practice-Based Approach to Environmental Policy.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning21 (5): 479–491. 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841 [Google Scholar]
  4. Behagel, Jelle Hendrik , and Esther Turnhout
    2011 “Democratic Legitimacy in the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands: Towards Participatory and Deliberative Norms?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning13 (3): 297–316. 10.1080/1523908X.2011.607002
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.607002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Braidotti, Rosi
    2018 “Ethics of Joy.” InPosthuman Glossary, edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova , 220–224. Bloomsbury Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke, Anthony , Simon Fishel , Audra Mitchell , Simon Dalby , and Daniel J. Levine
    2016 “Planet Politics: A Manifesto from the End of IR.” Millennium44 (3): 499–523. 10.1177/0305829816636674
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816636674 [Google Scholar]
  7. Büscher, Bram , Robert Fletcher , Dan Brockington , Chris Sandbrook , William M. Adams , Lisa Campbell (a4), Catherine Corson , Wolfram Dresslerf , Rosaleen Duffy , Noella Gray , George Holmes , Alice Kelly , Elizabeth Lunstrum , Maano Ramutsindela and Kartik Shanker
    2017 “Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical Ideas for Conservation, and their Implications.” Oryx51 (3): 407–410. 10.1017/S0030605316001228
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316001228 [Google Scholar]
  8. Daly, Glyn
    1999 “Ideology and its Paradoxes: Dimensions of Fantasy and Enjoyment.” Journal of Political Ideologies4 (2): 219–238. 10.1080/13569319908420796
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319908420796 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean, Mitchell
    1999 Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Descola, Philippe
    2013 Beyond Nature and Culture. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dryzek, John S.
    1997 The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Eberle, Jakub
    2017 “Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development22 (1): 243–268. 10.1057/s41268‑017‑0104‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0104-2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Epstein, Charlotte
    2008 The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262050920.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262050920.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Escobar, Arturo
    1999 “After Nature: Steps to an Anti-essentialist Political Ecology.” Current Anthropology40 (1): 1–30. 10.1086/515799
     https://doi.org/10.1086/515799 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fletcher, Robert
    2018 “Beyond the End of the World: Breaking Attachment to a Dying Planet”, inPsychoanalysis and the Global, edited by Ilan Kapoor , 48–69. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctv47w9gt.9
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w9gt.9 [Google Scholar]
  16. Galvin, Raymond James
    2011 Discourse aAnd Materiality in Environmental Policy: The Case of German Federal Policy on Thermal Renovation of Existing Homes. PhD Diss., University of East Anglia.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Glynos, Jason , and David Howarth
    2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  18. Glynos, Jason , and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2008 “Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory.” Subjectivity24 (1): 256–274. 10.1057/sub.2008.23
     https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.23 [Google Scholar]
  19. Glynos, Jason
    2001 “The Grip of Ideology: A Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies6 (2): 191–214. 10.1080/13569310120053858
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310120053858 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2008 “Ideological Fantasy at Work.” Journal of Political Ideologies13 (3): 275–296. 10.1080/13569310802376961
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310802376961 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2018 “Theory and Evidence in the Freudian Field: From Observation to Structure.” InLacan And Science, edited by Jason Glynos and Yannis Stavrakakis , 13–50. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429476501‑2
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429476501-2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Griggs, Steven , and David Howarth
    2008 “Populism, Localism and Environmental Politics: The Logic and Rhetoric of the Stop Stansted Expansion Campaign.” Planning Theory7 (2): 123–144. 10.1177/1473095208090431
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208090431 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gunder, Michael
    2015 “The Role of Fantasy in Public Policy Formation.” InEvolutionary Governance Theory, edited by Raoul Beunen , Kristof Van Assche , and Martijn Duineveld , 143–154. Cham: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hajer, Maarten A.
    2005 “Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” InDiscourse Theory in European Politics, 297–315. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523364_13
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_13 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1995 The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Haraway, Donna
    2015 “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities6 (1): 159–165. 10.1215/22011919‑3615934
     https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615934 [Google Scholar]
  27. Huxley, Thomas H.
    1869 “Nature: Aphorisms by Goethe.” Nature1: 9–11. 10.1038/001009a0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/001009a0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Isaacs, Susan
    1948 “The Nature and Function of Phantasy.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis29: 73–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jasanoff, Sheila
    (ed.) 2004 States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203413845
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kapoor, Ilan
    2014 “Psychoanalysis and Development: An Introduction.” Third World Quarterly, 35 (7): 1117–1119. 10.1080/01436597.2014.926099
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.926099 [Google Scholar]
  31. Klein, Melanie
    1975 Envy and Gratitude. And Other Works 1946–1963. London: The Hogarth Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lacan, Jacques
    2002 Ecrits: A Selection. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Latour, Bruno
    1993 We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mallory, Chaone
    2008 “Ecofeminism and a Politics of Performative Affinity: Direct Action, Subaltern Voices, and the Green Public Sphere.” Ecopolitics Online Journal1 (2): 2–13. 10.1108/S2041‑806X(2008)0000002002
     https://doi.org/10.1108/S2041-806X(2008)0000002002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mert, Ayşem
    2019 “Participation(s) in Transnational Environmental Governance: Green Values versus Instrumental Use.” Environmental Values281 (1): 101–121. 10.3197/096327119X15445433913596
     https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15445433913596 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mert, Aysem
    2015 Environmental Governance through Partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781782540052
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782540052 [Google Scholar]
  38. Methmann, Chris , and Delf Rothe
    2012 “Politics for the Day after Tomorrow: The Logic of Apocalypse in Global Climate Politics.” Security Dialogue43 (4): 323–344. 10.1177/0967010612450746
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010612450746 [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller, Jacques-Alain
    1992 “Duty and The Drives.” Newsletter of The Freudian Field, 6 (1/2): 5–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Remling, Elise
    2019 “Adaptation, now? Exploring the Politics of Climate Adaptation through Poststructuralist Discourse Theory.” PhD diss., Södertörn University.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Salter, Leon and Andrew Dickson
    2020 “The Fantasy of Healthy Food: Desire and Anxiety in Healthy Food Guide Magazine.” Critical Public Health, doi:  10.1080/09581596.2020.1724262
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1724262 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scott, Bruce
    2016 “The New Klein-Lacan Dialogues.” European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling. 18 (4): 427–430. 10.1080/13642537.2016.1260679
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1260679 [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith, Jonathan Z.
    1972 “I Am a Parrot (Red).” History of Religions11 (4): 391–413. 10.1086/462661
     https://doi.org/10.1086/462661 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spillius, Elizabeth Bott
    2001 “Freud and Klein on the C0oncept of Phantasy.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis82 (2): 361–373. 10.1516/5PWR‑57TK‑VT2U‑3XU8
     https://doi.org/10.1516/5PWR-57TK-VT2U-3XU8 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2005 “Passions of Identification: Discourse, Enjoyment, and European Identity.” InDiscourse theory in European politics, 68–92. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523364_3
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Swyngedouw, Erik , and Henrik Ernstson
    2018 “Interrupting the Anthropo-Obscene: Immuno-Biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture and Society35 (6): 3–30. 10.1177/0263276418757314
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsing, Anna , Heather Swanson , Eliane Gan , and Nils Bubandt
    eds. 2017 Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wamsler, Christina , and Ebba Brink
    2018 Mindsets for Sustainability: Exploring the Link Between Mindfulness and Sustainable Climate Adaptation. Ecological Economics151: 55–61. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029 [Google Scholar]
  49. Watts, Jonathan
    2019 “Jair Bolsonaro Claims without Evidence that NGOs are Setting Fires in Amazon Rainforest”. The Guardian, August21 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Wilson, Edward. O.
    2016 Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life. New York: WW Norton and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Yusoff, Kathryn
    2018 A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/9781452962054
     https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452962054 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zoja, Luigi
    1995 Growth and Guilt: Psychology and the Limits of Development. London: Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20049.beh
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anthropocene; discourse; ecological crisis; fantasmatic logics; global pandemic; natureculture; phantasy

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error