Discourse, concepts, ideologies

References

1. Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen
   2007 “Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics6: 266–293. doi:  10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car [Google Scholar]
2. Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu
   2006 “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies11: 211–235. doi:  10.1080/13569310600923782
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600923782 [Google Scholar]
3. d’Ancona, Matthew
   2017 Post Truth. London: Ebury Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Fairclough, Norman
   2001 Language and Power, 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Flinders, Matthew, and Matt Wood
   2018 “Discursive Depoliticisation and Political Disengagement.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited byRuth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, 603–617. London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Freeden, Michael
   1996 Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Freeden, Michael
   2003 Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Freeden, Michael
   2012 “The Professional Responsibilities of the Political Theorist.” InLiberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden, edited byBen Jackson and Marc Stears, 259–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600670.003.0014
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600670.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
9. Freeden, Michael
   2013 The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568031.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568031.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Freeden, Michael
    2021 “Ideologiekritik – A Critique.” InPostcolonial Texts and Contexts, edited byKatja Sarkowsky & Mark Stein, 15–29. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Freeden, Michael, Lyman Tower Sargent, and Marc Stears
    eds. 2013 The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Freeden, Michael, Javier Fernández-Sebastián, and Jörn Leonhard
    eds. 2019 In Search of European Liberalisms: Concepts, Languages, Ideologies. Berghahn: New York and Oxford. 10.2307/j.ctv1850h1f
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1850h1f [Google Scholar]
13. Geuss, Raymond
    1981 The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Glynos, Jason
    2001 “The Grip of Ideology: a Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.” Journal of Political Ideologies6: 191–214. doi:  10.1080/13569310120053858
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310120053858 [Google Scholar]
15. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
16. Glynos, Jason, Robin Klimecki, and Hugh Willmott
    2015 “Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process.” Critical Policy Studies9(4): 393–415. doi:  10.1080/19460171.2015.1009841
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1009841 [Google Scholar]
17. Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno
    2002 Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804788090
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804788090 [Google Scholar]
18. Howarth, David
    ed. 2015 Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Laycock, David
    ed. 2019 Political Ideology in Parties, Policy, and Civil Society: Interdisciplinary Insights. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Martínez Rivas, Rafael, and Irene Lanzas Zotes
    2020 “Tres Approximaciones Teóricas a Los Discursos Polítocos: Concepto, Significante y Argumento.” Revista de Estudios Politicos188: 41–69. 10.18042/cepc/rep.188.02
    https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.188.02 [Google Scholar]
24. Therborn, Göran
    1980 The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thompson, Martyn P.
    1993 “Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meanings.” History and Theory32: 248–272. 10.2307/2505525
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2505525 [Google Scholar]
26. Trencsényi, Balázs, Michal Kopeček, Luka Lisjak Gabrijelčič, Maria Falina, Mónika Baár, and Maciej Janowski
    2018 A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe, vol.II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner
    eds. 2018 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    eds. 2009 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd revised edition). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]