1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Many scholars have drawn attention to the affective power that aspects of discourse and practice exert in our social and political life. Fantasy is a concept that, like structures of feeling, rhetoric, myth, metaphor, and utopia, has generated illuminating explanatory and interpretive insights with which to better understand the operation of this power. In this piece I argue that there are distinctive virtues in affirming the value of the category of fantasy, from a theoretical point of view. Importantly, however, I also argue that the qualification ‘critical’ in captures something about how such studies can draw out the normative, ideological, and politico-strategic implications of psychoanalytic insights and observations, and thus become part of a broader enterprise in critical theoretical and empirical research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20052.gly
2020-12-14
2021-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Best, Beverley, Werner Bonefeld, and Chris O’Kane
    eds. 2018The Sage Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781526436122
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526436122 [Google Scholar]
  2. Billig, Michael
    1997 “‘Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages.” InThe Message of Social Psychology, edited byCraig McGarty and Alexander Haslam, 36–53. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, Judith
    2006Precarious Life: the Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caspi, Tair
    2018 “Towards psychoanalytic contribution to linguistic metaphor theory.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 99 (5): 1186–1211. 10.1080/00207578.2018.1490476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2018.1490476 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, Wei-Yuan, and Jason Glynos
    2011 “Ideology and Politics in the Popular Press: The Case of the 2009 UK MP’s Expenses Scandal.” inDiscourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, edited byLincoln Dahlberg and Sean Phelan, 106–127. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511_5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Connolly, William
    2008Capitalism and Christianity, American Style. Durham: Duke. 10.1215/9780822381235
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381235 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017Aspirational Fascism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Finlayson, Alan
    2012 “Rhetoric and the Political Theory of Ideologies.” Political Studies60 (4): 751–67. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2012.00948.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00948.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Glynos, Jason
    2010 “Lacan at Work.” InLacan and Organization, edited byCarl Cederstrom and Casper Hoedemaeker, 13–58. MayFly Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2011 “On the Ideological and Political Significance of Fantasy in the Organization of Work.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society16 (4): 373–393. 10.1057/pcs.2010.34
    https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2010.34 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2014 “Death, Fantasy, And The Ethics Of Mourning.” InThe Social Construction of Death Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Edited byLeen Van Brussel and Nico Carpentier, 137–160. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137391919_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391919_8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Glynos, Jason and David Howarth
    2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  13. Glynos, Jason, Joanildo Burity, and Gustavo Oliveira
    2019 “Critical Fantasy Studies: Neoliberalism, Education, Identification.” Serie-Estudos24 (52): 145–170. 10.20435/serie‑estudos.v20i52.1378
    https://doi.org/10.20435/serie-estudos.v20i52.1378 [Google Scholar]
  14. Glynos, Jason and Savvas Voutyras
    2016 “Ideology as Blocked Mourning: Greek National Identity in Times of Economic Crisis and Austerity.” Journal of Political Ideologies21 (3): 201–224. 10.1080/13569317.2016.1207300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1207300 [Google Scholar]
  15. Glynos, Jason and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2004 “Encounters of the Real Kind: Sussing Out the Limits of Laclau’s Embrace of Lacan.” InLaclau: A Critical Reader, edited bySimon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 110–128. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lacan, Jacques
    2007Seminar XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. NY: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 “Glimpsing the Future: A Reply.” InLaclau: A Critical Reader, edited bySimon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, 279–328. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2010 “Politics and the Unconscious: An Interview.” Subjectivity3: 231–244. 10.1057/sub.2010.12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2010.12 [Google Scholar]
  20. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lapping, Claudia and Jason Glynos
    2019 “‘Two for joy’ – Towards a better understanding of free associative methods as sites of transference in empirical research.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society24 (4): 432–451. 10.1057/s41282‑019‑00133‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-019-00133-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Layton, Lynne
    2020Toward a Social Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003023098
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023098 [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, James
    2014Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 “Capturing Desire: Rhetorical Strategies and the Affectivity of Discourse.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (1): 143–160. 10.1111/1467‑856X.12065
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12065 [Google Scholar]
  26. Morelock, Jeremiah
    ed. 2018Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism. London: University of Westminster Press. 10.16997/book30
    https://doi.org/10.16997/book30 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mouffe, Chantal
    1993The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ormrod, James
    2014Fantasy and Social Movements. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137348173
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348173 [Google Scholar]
  29. Parker, Ian
    2010 “Psychosocial studies: Lacanian discourse analysis negotiating interview text.” Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society15 (2): 156–172. 10.1057/pcs.2009.21
    https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2009.21 [Google Scholar]
  30. Rose, Jacqueline
    1996States of Fantasy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    1999Lacan & the Political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009 “Discourse and Affect: Conceptual and Political Dialectics in Theory and Empirical Analysis.” 59th Annual Meeting. Political Studies Association. Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zizek, Slavoj
    1989The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20052.gly
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error