The rise of the new Polish far-right

References

1. Adami, Elisabetta
   2016 “Multimodality”. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, ed. byOfelia García, Nelson Flores, and Massimiliano Spotti, 451–472. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blommaert, Jan., and Chris Bulcean
   2000 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology29: 447–466. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447 [Google Scholar]
3. Caramani, Daniele, and Luca Manucci
   2019 “National Past and Populism: The Re-Elaboration of Fascism and Its Impact on Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe.” West European Politics42 (6): 1159–87. 10.1080/01402382.2019.1596690
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596690 [Google Scholar]
4. Castelli Gattinara, Pietro, and Andrea L. P. Pirro
   2019 “The far right as social movement.” European Societies21 (4): 447–462. 10.1080/14616696.2018.1494301
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494301 [Google Scholar]
5. Chaidas, Dimitrios
   2018a “The Benefits of Narratology in the Analysis of Multimodal Legitimation: The Case of New Democracy.” Discourse & Communication12 (3): 258–277. 10.1177/1750481318757770
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757770 [Google Scholar]
6. Chaidas, Dimitrios
   2018b “Legitimation strategies in the Greek paradigm: A comparative analysis of Syriza and New Democracy.” Language & Communication60: 136–149. 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.008 [Google Scholar]
7. Cheles, Luciano
   2010 “Back to the Future. The Visual Propaganda of Alleanza Nazionale (1994–2009).” Journal of Modern Italian Studies15 (2): 232–311. 10.1080/13545711003606644
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13545711003606644 [Google Scholar]
8. Chołuj, Bożena
   2021 “Gender und LGTBQ: Unbekannte Begriffe als Machtinstrumente in Polen [Gender and LGTBQ: Unknown Terms as Instruments of Power in Poland]” InAnti-Genderismus in Europa Allianzen von Rechtspopulismus und religiösem Fundamentalismus. Mobilisierung – Vernetzung – Transformation, ed. bySonja A. Strube, Rita Perintfalvi, Raphaela Hemet, Miriam Metze, and Cicek Sahbaz, 147–160. 10.14361/9783839453155‑011
   https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839453155-011 [Google Scholar]
9. Danero Iglesias, Julien
   2015 “An Ad Hoc Nation.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures29 (4): 850–70. 10.1177/0888325414559269
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414559269 [Google Scholar]
10. Demata, Massimiliano
    2017 “‘A Great and Beautiful Wall.’” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5 (2): 274–94. 10.1075/jlac.5.2.06dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.06dem [Google Scholar]
11. Dijk, Teun A. van
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society4 (2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
12. Dijk, Teun A. van
    1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Disourse1 (1): 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dijk, Teun A. van
    2006 “Discourse and manipulation.” Discourse & Society17 (3): 359–383. 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
14. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing Discourse Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
15. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse as Social Interaction, ed. byTeun van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
16. “Grzegorz Braun szczerze o ‘układzie gdańskim’ i... Arce Gdynia! [Grzegorz Braun honest about the Gdańsk Pact and… Arka Gdynia!].” Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b16n42shHtE
17. “Grzegorz Braun: Stworzyłem gdańszczanom możliwość wyboru [Grzegorz Braun: I created the residents of Gdańsk a possibility of choice].” 14 February 2019. Available online: wybrzeze24.pl/aktualnosci/grzegorz-braun-stworzylem-gdanszczanom-mozliwosc-wyboru
18. Hameleers, Michael, Linda Bos, and Claes H. de Vreese
    2017 “‘They Did It’: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication.” Communication Research44 (6): 870–900. 10.1177/0093650216644026
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026 [Google Scholar]
19. Jacobs, Kristof, and Niels Spierings
    2019 “A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use.” Information, Communication & Society22 (12): 1681–96. 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883 [Google Scholar]
20. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2015 Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy: Self and Other in representations of Iran’s nuclear programme. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.62
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.62 [Google Scholar]
21. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “#refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-Refugee Discourse on Twitter.” Discourse & Communication11 (5): 498–514. 10.1177/1750481317714121
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714121 [Google Scholar]
22. Kress, Gunther
    2009 “What is Mode?” InThe Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. byCarey Jewitt, 54–67. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2013 “From Anti-Immigration and Nationalist Revisionism to Islamophobia: continuities and shifts in recent discourses and patterns of political communication of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ).” InRight-Wing Populism in Europe. Politics and Discourse, ed. byRuth Wodak, Majid KhosraviNik, and Brigitte Mral, 135–148. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781472544940.ch‑009
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-009 [Google Scholar]
25. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2018 “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2): 76–96. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897 [Google Scholar]
26. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2020 “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism.” Social Semiotics30 (4): 503–527. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
27. Krzyżanowska, Natalia, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2018 “Crisis and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion.” Sociology52 (3): 612–618. 10.1177/0038038518757952
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518757952 [Google Scholar]
28. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication1 (1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
29. Lipiński, Artur, and Agnieszka Stępińska
    2019 “Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media: The Unexpected Careers of Paweł Kukiz and Janusz Korwin-Mikke.” Problems of Post-Communism66 (1): 71–82. 10.1080/10758216.2018.1484667
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2018.1484667 [Google Scholar]
30. Mackay, Rowan R.
    2013 “Legitimation by Multimodal Means: A Theoretical and Analytical Enquiry with Specific Reference to American Political Spot Advertisements.” PhD diss., University of Edinburgh.
31. Mackay, Rowan R.
    2015 “Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence.” Discourse & Society26 (3): 323–348. 10.1177/0957926514564737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564737 [Google Scholar]
32. Markowski, Radoslaw
    2020 “Plurality Support for Democratic Decay: The 2019 Polish Parliamentary Election.” West European Politics, February, 1–13. 10.1080/01402382.2020.1720171
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1720171 [Google Scholar]
33. Meyer, Michael
    2001 “Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byMichael Meyer, and Ruth Wodak, 14–31. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mertes, Michael
    2018 “The Autumn of Our Discontent: Germany Facing Populism.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs12 (1): 11–19. 10.1080/23739770.2018.1470784
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2018.1470784 [Google Scholar]
35. Norris, Sigrid
    2015 Multimodality. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Norocel, Ov Cristian, and Gabriella Szabó
    2019 “Special Issue: Mapping the Discursive Opportunities for Radical-Right Populist Politics across Eastern Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism66(1): 1–7. 10.1080/10758216.2019.1537040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1537040 [Google Scholar]
37. Norocel, Ov Cristian, Gabriella Szabó, and Márton Bene
    2019 “Media Visibility and Inclusion of Radical Right Populism in Hungary and Romania: A Discursive Opportunity Approach.” Problems of Post-Communism66(3), 1–14. 10.1080/10758216.2019.1537040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1537040 [Google Scholar]
38. Pędziwiatr, Konrad
    2016 “Islamophobia in Poland. National report 2016.” InEuropean Islamophobia Report, ed. byEnes Bayraklı, and Farid Hafez, 411–443. Ankara: SETA.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pond, Philip, and Jeff Lewis
    2019 “Riots and Twitter: Connective Politics, Social Media and Framing Discourses in the Digital Public Sphere.” Information, Communication & Society22 (2): 213–31. 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539 [Google Scholar]
40. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Ant-Semitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The discourse-historical approach (DHA).” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis. Second Edition, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rensmann, Lars
    2017 “The Noisy Counter-Revolution: Understanding the Cultural Conditions and Dynamics of Populist Politics in Europe in the Digital Age.” Politics and Governance5: 123–35. 10.17645/pag.v5i4.1123
    https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1123 [Google Scholar]
43. Richardson, John, and Monica Colombo
    2013 “Continuity and Change in Anti-Immigrant Discourse in Italy.” Journal of Language and Politics12 (2): 180–202. 10.1075/jlp.12.2.02ric
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.2.02ric [Google Scholar]
44. “Układ gdański [The Gdańsk Pact].” Available online: https://www.kwwgrzegorzabrauna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ukladgdanski-cyfrowa.pdf
45. Wodak, Ruth
    2002 “Aspects of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik36: 5–31.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
48. Wodak, Ruth
    2016 “We have the character of an island nation. A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg speech” on the European Union”. InDoing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse, ed.Michael Kranert, and Geraldine Horan, 27–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2014 “Semiotic technology and practice: a multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint.” Text & Talk34 (3): 349–375. 10.1515/text‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]