1887
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article assesses the current state of play of the poststructuralist and post-Marxist discourse theory associated with Laclau and Mouffe and the ‘Essex school’, and identifies ways forward at the level of theory development, research practice and critique. The article starts by disentangling the different meanings of the notion of ‘discourse’ in ‘discourse theory’, clarifying the specificities of discourse theory as a theoretical and analytical framework and situating discourse theory in, but also beyond, critical discourse studies. It then moves to an assessment of the current state of discourse theory, its main contributions, and the identification of shortcomings and ways forward. This discussion is organized around five topics: methodology and the theory-analysis dialectic; the logics approach; the discursive-material relation; the role of fantasy and other psychoanalytic categories; and populism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
2020-12-18
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arditi, Benjamin
    2007Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anastasiou, Michaelangelo
    2019 “Of Nation and People: The Discursive Logic of Nationalist Populism.” Javnost – The Public26 (3): 330–345. doi:  10.1080/13183222.2019.1606562
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1606562 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen, Niels A.
    2003Discursive analytical strategies. Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t898nd [Google Scholar]
  4. Bal, P. Matthijs, and Edina Dóci
    2018 “Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology27 (5): 536–548. doi:  10.1080/1359432X.2018.1449108
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1449108 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barad, Karen
    2007Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlett, Tom, and Nicolina Montesano Montessori
    2021 “Towards Webs of Equivalence and the Political Nomad in Agonistic Debate: Contributions from CDA and Scales theory.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beasley-Murray, Jon
    2006 “Book Review: Ernesto Laclau’s On Populist Reason and Franciso Panizza’s Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory5 (3): 362–367. 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300255
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300255 [Google Scholar]
  8. Behagel, Jelle, and Ayşem Mert
    2021 “The Political Nature of Fantasy and Political Fantasies of Nature.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Borriello, Arthur, and Anton Jäger
    2020 “Left-Populism on Trial: Laclauian Politics in Theory and Practice.” Theory & Event23 (3): 740–764. muse.jhu.edu/article/760420
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Breeze, Ruth
    2018 “Positioning “the people” and its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP.” Javnost – The Public26 (1): 89–104. doi:  10.1080/13183222.2018.1531339
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1531339 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpentier, Nico
    2010 “Deploying discourse theory. An introduction to discourse theory and discourse theoretical analysis.” Media and Communication Studies Interventions, edited byNico Carpentier , 251–266. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2017The Discursive-Material Knot. Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2019 “Enriching Discourse Theory. The Discursive-Material Knot as a Non-Hierarchical Ontology.” Global Discourse, 9 (2): 369–384. doi:  10.1332/204378919X15526540593633
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378919X15526540593633 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2021 “Doing justice to the agential material: A reflection on a non-hierarchical repositioning of the discursive and the material.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen
    2007 “Bringing discourse theory into media studies: the applicability of discourse theoretical analysis (DTA) for the study of media practices and discourses.” Journal of language and politics6 (2): 265–293. doi:  10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car [Google Scholar]
  16. Carpentier, Nico, Benjamin De Cleen, and Leen Van Brussel
    2019 “Introduction: Discourse Theory, Media and Communication, and the Work of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group.” InCommunication and Discourse Theory, edited byLeen Van Brussel, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen, 1–31. Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Yiming
    2020 The Construction of the Professional Identity of the TV News Presenter in Two Chinese News Programmes: A Discourse-Theoretical Study. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Uppsala University, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1424315/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  18. Cossarini, Paolo and Fernando Vellaspin
    eds. 2019Populism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351205474
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205474 [Google Scholar]
  19. Csigó, Péter
    2016The Neo-popular Bubble. Speculating on the People in Late Modernity. Budapest: CEU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dahlberg, Lincoln, and Sean Phelan
    eds. 2011Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511 [Google Scholar]
  21. De Cleen, Benjamin
    2012The Rhetoric of the Flemish Populist Radical Right Party Vlaams Blok / Belang in a Context of Discursive Struggle: a Discourse-theoretical Analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2019 “The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’.” InImagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist discourses across the political spectrum, edited byJan Zienkowski & Ruth Breeze, 19–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/dapsac.83.02cle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.02cle [Google Scholar]
  23. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Jason Glynos
    2021 “Beyond Populism Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, and Aurelien Mondon
    2021 “Populist Politics and the Politics of “Populism”: The Radical Right in Western Europe.” inPopulism in Global Perspective. A Performatived and Discursive Approach, edited byPierre Ostiguy, Francisco Panizza, and Benjamin Moffitt. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dean, Jonathan, and Bice Maiguashca
    2020 “Did Somebody Say Populism? Towards a Renewal and Reorientation of populism studies.” Journal of Political Ideologies25 (1): 11–27. doi:  10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712 [Google Scholar]
  26. Demata, Massimiliano, Michelangelo Conoscenti, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2020 “Riding the Populist Wave: Metaphors of Populism and Anti-Populism in the Daily Mail and The Guardian.” Iperstoria15: 8–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Eberle, Jakub
    2019Discourse and Affect in Foreign Policy. Germany and the Iraq War. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429487392
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487392 [Google Scholar]
  28. Eklundh, Emmy
    2019Emotions, Protest, Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351205719
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205719 [Google Scholar]
  29. Escobar, Arturo
    1999 “After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology.” Current Anthropology40 (1): 1–30. 10.1086/515799
    https://doi.org/10.1086/515799 [Google Scholar]
  30. Finlayson, Alan
    2007 “From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations9 (4): 545–563. doi: 10.1111/2Fj.1467‑856x.2007.00269.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1467-856x.2007.00269.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Flintoff, Adam, Ewen Speed, and Susan J. McPherson
    2019 “Risk assessment practice within primary mental health care: A logics perspective.” Health23 (6): 656–674. doi: 10.1177/2F1363459318769471
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1363459318769471 [Google Scholar]
  32. Foucault, Michel
    1977Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Tavistock.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Freeden, Michael
    2021 “Discourse, Concepts, Ideologies: Pausing for Thought.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Galanopoulos, Antonis, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2019 “Populism, Anti-populism and Post-truth in Crisis-ridden Greece.” POPULISMUS working papers10. www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/WP-10-upload-2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson-Graham, Julie Katherine
    2006A Postcapitalist Politics. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Glasze, Georg
    (2007) Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskurstheorie von Laclau und Mouffe in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung8 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Glynos, Jason
    2011 “Fantasy and identity in critical political theory.” Filozofski vestnik32 (2): 65–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2012 “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter.” InLanguage, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited bySanja Bahun, and Dusan Radunovic, 173–192. London: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2014 “Hating Government and Voting Against One’s Interests: Self-Transgression, Enjoyment, Critique.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society19 (2): 179–189. doi:  10.1057/pcs.2014.2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2014.2 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2021 “Critical Fantasy Studies.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political theory. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  42. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Ewen Speed
    2009Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. NCRM.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Kostis Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez
    2021 “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods: Advances, Challenges and Ways Forward.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Glynos, Jason, and Aurelien Mondon
    2019 “The political logic of populist hype: The case of right wing’s populism’s ‘meteoric rise’ and its relation to the status quo.” InPopulism and Passions: Democratic Legitimacy after Austerity, edited byPaolo Cossarini, and Fernando Vellaspin, 82–101. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351205474‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205474-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Goyvaerts, Jana, and Benjamin De Cleen
    2020 “Media, Anti-Populist Discourse and the Dynamics of the Populism Debate.” InPerspectives on Populism and the Media, edited byBenjamin Krämer, and Christina Holtz-Bacha, 83–108. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 10.5771/9783845297392‑83
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297392-83 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas
    2015 “Discourse in a Material World.” Journal of Management Studies52 (5): 680–696. doi:  10.1111/joms.12113
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12113 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hinshelwood, Robert, and Wilhelm Skogstad
    2000Observing Organizations. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoedemaekers, Casper
    2018 “Creative Work and Affect: Social, Political and Fantasmatic Dynamics in the Labour of Musicians.” Human Relations71 (10): 1348–70. doi: 10.1177/2F0018726717741355
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0018726717741355 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hollway, Wendy, and Tony Jefferson
    2000Doing Qualitative Research Differently. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849209007
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209007 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hook, Derek
    2007Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230592322
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592322 [Google Scholar]
  51. Howarth, David
    1998 “Discourse theory and political analysis.” InResearch strategies in the social sciences, edited byElinor Scarbrough, and Eric Tanenbaum, 268–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198292376.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198292376.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2000Discourse. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2005 “Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation.” InDiscourse Theory in European Politics, edited byDavid Howarth, and Jakob Torfing, 316–350. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230523364_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Howarth, David, and Jakob Torfing
    eds. 2005Discourse Theory in European Politics. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230523364
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364 [Google Scholar]
  55. Howarth, David, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    eds. 2000Discourse theory and political analysis. Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Jacobs, Thomas, and Robin Tschötschel
    2019 “Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology22 (5): 469–485. doi:  10.1080/13645579.2019.1576317
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1576317 [Google Scholar]
  57. Jäger, Anton
    2017 “The semantic drift: Images of populism in post-war American historiography and their relevance for (European) political science.” Constellations24 (3): 310–323. 10.1111/1467‑8675.12308
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12308 [Google Scholar]
  58. Jørgensen, Marianne W., and Louise J. Phillips
    2002Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208871
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871 [Google Scholar]
  59. Karakatsanis, Leonidas
    2014Turkish-Greek relations: Rapprochement, civil society and the politics of friendship. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315848228
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848228 [Google Scholar]
  60. Karavasilis, Lazaros
    2017 “Perceptions of ‘Populism’ and ‘Anti-populism’ in Greek Public Discourse during the Crisis: The case of the website ‘Anti-news’.” Politik20 (4): 58–70. 10.7146/politik.v20i4.101535
    https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v20i4.101535 [Google Scholar]
  61. Katsambekis, Giorgos
    2017 “The Populist Surge in Post-Democratic Times: Theoretical and Political Challenges.” The Political Quarterly88 (2): 202–210. doi:  10.1111/1467‑923X.12317
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12317 [Google Scholar]
  62. Laclau, Ernesto
    1999 [1989] “Politics and the limits of modernity.” In: Postmodernism: a reader, edited byThomas Docherty, 329–343. Harvester: Wheathsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1990New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 1991 “Intellectual Strategies; Memorandum to PhD Students in the IDA Programme.” Essex UniversityDownloaded fromhttps://thatsnotit.wordpress.com/library/ernesto-laclau-phd-thesis-recommendations/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. . n.d. “The Philosophical Roots of Discourse Theory.” the University of Essex Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Online Paper. Downloaded fromhttps://noehernandezcortez.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/philosophical-roots-of-discourse-theory.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1987 “Post-Marxism Without Apologies”. New Left Review166: 79–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Lapping, Claudia
    2011Psychoanalysis in Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203882825
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882825 [Google Scholar]
  70. Latour, Bruno
    2005Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mandelbaum, Moran
    2020 “Making Our Country Great Again: The Politics of Subjectivity in an Age of National-Populism”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law33: 451–476. doi:  10.1007/s11196‑020‑09717‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09717-6 [Google Scholar]
  72. Marchart, Oliver
    2018Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Martin, James
    2016 “Capturing Desire: Rhetorical Strategies and the Affectivity of Discourse.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (1): 143–160. doi: 10.1111/2F1467‑856X.12065
    https://doi.org/10.1111/2F1467-856X.12065 [Google Scholar]
  74. Marttila, Tomas
    2015Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Mazzolini, Samuele
    2020 “Populism Is not Hegemony: Towards a Re-Gramscianization of Ernesto Laclau.” Theory & Event23 (3): 765–786. muse.jhu.edu/article/760421
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2015 “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition50 (2): 189–217. 10.1017/gov.2014.13
    https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.13 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mouffe, Chantal
    1993The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 2000The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 2005On the Political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
    2017Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  81. Nabers, Dirk
    2015A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137528070
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137528070 [Google Scholar]
  82. Nikisianis, Nikos, Thomas Siomos, Yannis Stavrakakis, Titika Dimitroulia, and Grigoris Markou
    2019 “Populism Versus Anti-populism in the Greek Press: Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory Meets Corpus Linguistics.” InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila, 267–295. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_12 [Google Scholar]
  83. Nonhoff, Martin
    2007 “Hegemonic Analysis: on The Recent Development of Political Discourse Analysis in the Political Sciences.” Langage et société120 (2): 77–90. 10.3917/ls.120.0077
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.120.0077 [Google Scholar]
  84. Norval, Aletta
    2000 “Trajectories of future research in discourse theory.” InDiscourse Theory and Political Analysis. Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited byDavid Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, 219–236. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Nymalm, Nicola
    2013 “The End of the ‘Liberal Theory of History’? Dissecting the US Congress’ Discourse on China’s Currency Policy.” International Political Sociology7 (4): 388–405. doi:  10.1111/ips.12030
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12030 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ostiguy, Pierre
    2009 “The High-Low Political Divide. Rethinking Populism and Anti-Populism.” Kellogg Institute Committee on Concepts and Methods Working PaperSeries 360. Downloaded fromnd.edu/~kellogg/publications/workingpapers/WPS/360.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Ronderos, Sebastian
    2020 “Hysteria in the Squares: Approaching Populism from a Perspective of Desire”. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society. doi:  10.1057/s41282‑020‑00189‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-020-00189-y [Google Scholar]
  88. Roussos, Konstantinos
    2019 “Grassroots collective action within and beyond institutional and state solutions: the (re-)politicization of everyday life in crisis-ridden Greece.” Social Movements Studies18 (3): 265–283. doi:  10.1080/14742837.2018.1562330
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1562330 [Google Scholar]
  89. Salter, Leon
    2016 “Populism as a fantasmatic rupture in the post-political order” Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online11 (2): 116–132. doi:  10.1080/1177083X.2015.1132749
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2015.1132749 [Google Scholar]
  90. Shepard, Paul
    1996The Others: How Animals Made Us Human. Washington: Island Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Sjolander, Annika Egan and Jenny Gunnarsson Payne
    (eds.) 2011Tracking Discourses: Politics, Identity and Social Change. Chicago: Nordic Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Smith, Anna Marie
    1998Laclau and Mouffe. The Radical Democratic Imaginary. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    1999Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 2004 “Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies9 (3): 253–267. doi:  10.1080/1356931042000263519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2007The Lacanian Left. Albany: SUNY Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748619801.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748619801.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  96. ed. 2020The Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic Political Theory. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 2021 “The (discursive) limits of (left) populism.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Ioannis Andreadis, and Giorgos Katsambekis
    2017a “A new populism index at work: identifying populist candidates and parties in the contemporary Greek context.” European Politics and Society18 (4): 446–464. doi:  10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1261434 [Google Scholar]
  99. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Nikos Nikisianis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, and Thomas Siomos
    2017b “Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: revisiting a reified association.” Critical Discourse Studies14 (4): 420–439. doi:  10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325 [Google Scholar]
  100. Thomassen, Lasse
    2008 “Methods and philosophy of social science for discourse theory.” Journal of Power1 (2): 217–222. doi:  10.1080/17540290802227627
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17540290802227627 [Google Scholar]
  101. Thompson, Mark, and Hugh Willmott
    2016 “The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice.” Human Relations69 (2): 483–506. doi: 10.1177/2F0018726715593161
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0018726715593161 [Google Scholar]
  102. Tomanić Trivundža, Ilija, and Andreja Vezovnik
    2021 ““Symbolic Photographs” as Floating and Empty Signifiers: Iconic Transformation of News Photography.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Topper, Keith
    2010 “Book in Review: Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory.” Political Theory38 (5): 731–738. doi:  10.1177/0090591710372871
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591710372871 [Google Scholar]
  104. Torfing, Jacob
    1999New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 2005 “Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges.” InDiscourse Theory in European Politics, edited byDavid Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 1–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523364_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_1 [Google Scholar]
  106. Van Brussel, Leen
    2018 “The right to die: a Belgian case study combining reception studies and discourse theory.” Media, Culture and Society40 (3): 381–96. doi: 10.1177/2F0163443717718255
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0163443717718255 [Google Scholar]
  107. Van Brussel, Leen, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen
    eds. 2019Communication and Discourse Theory. Collected Works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group. Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. West, Karen
    2011 “Articulating discursive and materialist conceptions of practice in the logics approach to critical policy analysis.” Critical Policy Studies5 (4): 414–433. doi:  10.1080/19460171.2011.628033
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.628033 [Google Scholar]
  109. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Wodak, Ruth, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2017 “Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 471–484. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
  111. Zicman de Barros, Thomas
    2019 “Identity, Enjoyment and the Democratic Potentialities of Populism”. InUne Nouvelle Lecture du Populisme: Psychanalyse et Politique, edited byChristian Hoffmann, and Joel Birman, 79–115. Paris: Langage.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 2020 “Desire and collective Identities: Decomposing Ernesto Laclau’s notion of demand” Constellations1–11. doi:  10.1111/1467‑8675.12490
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12490 [Google Scholar]
  113. Zienkowksi, Jan and Ruth Breeze
    2019Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist Discourses Across the Political Spectrum. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/dapsac.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83 [Google Scholar]
  114. Zienkowski, Jan
    2012 “Overcoming the post-structuralist methodological deficit: metapragmatic markers and interpretive logics in a critique of the Bologna process.” Pragmatics22 (3): 501–534. doi:  10.1075/prag.22.3.07zie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.22.3.07zie [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error