1887
image of Return migrants from the United States to Mexico
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines Mexican return migrants belonging to the 1.5 generation of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Our analysis disaggregates the notions that these return migrants have regarding “being Mexican” and speaking Spanish after spending most of their lives in the U.S. Building on critical citizenship theories ( ), specifically on the concepts of status, habitus, and acts, we analyze how these return migrants experience and build notions of citizenship in Mexico while they develop additional linguistic repertoires in Spanish and acquire basic knowledge of Mexican culture. Our findings suggest that return migrants go through various simultaneous learning processes to acquire Mexican habitus in Mexico even though they acquire formal citizenship. This learning process we argue occurs amidst multiple social, linguistic, and cultural tensions that trigger important acts of (linguistic) citizenship through which returnees found their own definition of what it means to be “Mexican”.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21004.jac
2022-02-01
2022-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrego, Leisy
    2011 “Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First-and 1.5 Generation Immigrants.” Law and Society Review45(2): 337–370. 10.1111/j.1540‑5893.2011.00435.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00435.x [Google Scholar]
  2. 2014 “Latino Immigrants’ Diverse Experiences of Illegality.” InConstructing Immigrant ‘Illegality’: Critiques, Experiences, and Responses, ed. byCecilia Menjivar and Daniel Kanstroom, 139–160. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abrego, Leisy and Roberto Gonzáles
    2010 “Blocked paths. Uncertain Futures. The Post-Secondary Education and Labor Market Prospects of Undocumented Latino youth.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15 (1–2): 144–57. 10.1080/10824661003635168
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10824661003635168 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzaldua, Gloria
    1987Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, California: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beltrán, Cristina
    2009 “Going Public: Hannah Arendt, Immigrant Action and the Space of Appearance.” Political Theory. 37(5): 595–622. 10.1177/0090591709340134
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709340134 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1980Le sens pratique. Collection Le Sens Commun. Paris, France: Les Éditions de Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1986 “Chapter 1 : The forms of capital”. InRichardson, J. (Ed.), The Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp.241–258. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Department of Homeland Security
    Department of Homeland Security 2003–2018Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Aliens Returned by Region and Country of Nationality: Fiscal Years 2003 to 2018. Retrieved onlinehttps://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2018/table40, consultedJuly 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Despagne, Colette
    2018 “Language Is What Makes Everything Easier”: The Awareness of Semiotic Resources of Mexican Transnational Students in Mexican Schools, International Multilingual Research Journal, 1–15. 10.1080/19313152.2018.1470435
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2018.1470435 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Norman; Mulderrig, Jane and Wodak, Ruth
    2011 “Chapter 17: Critical Discourse Analysis”. InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781446289068.n17
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n17 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fortier, Anne-Marie
    2013 “What’s the Big Deal? Naturalization and the Politics of Desire.” Citizenship Studies, 17 (6–7): 697–711. 10.1080/13621025.2013.780761
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780761 [Google Scholar]
  12. García, Ofelia and Lin, Angel
    2017 “Extending Understandings of Bilingual and Multilingual Education”. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.), edited byGarcía Ofelia, Lin Angel and May Stephen, Bilingual and Multilingual Education, 1–20. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02258‑1_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzáles, Roberto
    2011 “Learning to Be Illegal.” American Sociological Review. 76 (4), 602–619. 10.1177/0003122411411901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411411901 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016Lives in Limbo. Undocumented and Coming of Age in America. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzales, Roberto and Nando Sigona
    (eds) 2017Within and Beyond Citizenship: Borders, Membership and Belonging. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315268910
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268910 [Google Scholar]
  16. Isin, Engin. F.
    2008 “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship”, ed. byEngin F. Isin, and Greg M. NielseninActs of Citizenship, 15–43. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Isin, Engin F.
    2009 “Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen.” Subjectivity, 29: 367–388. 10.1057/sub.2009.25
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.25 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobo, Mónica, Despagne, Colette
    2022 “Jóvenes migrantes de retorno: construyendo nociones alternativas de ciudadanía en México”. Estudios Sociológicos, 119: 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobo, Mónica, Cárdenas, Nuty
    2020 “Back on your Own: Return Migration and the Federal Government Response in Mexico”. Migraciones Internacionales, 11:1–16. 10.33679/rmi.v1i1.1731
    https://doi.org/10.33679/rmi.v1i1.1731 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kosnac, Hillary, Wayne Cornelius, Tom Wong, Micah Gell-Redman, and Alex Hughes
    2015One Step In and One Step Out: The Lived Experience of Immigrant Participants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program. California: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies-University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lorelli, S. Nowell1, Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules
    2017 “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Milani, Tomasso M.
    2015 “Language and Citizenship. Broadening the agenda” Journal of Language and Politics, 14 (3): 319–334. 10.1075/jlp.14.3.01mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.3.01mil [Google Scholar]
  23. Olvera, José J. and Carolina Muela, C.
    2016 “Sin familia en México: Redes Sociales Alternativas para la Migración de Retorno de Jóvenes Mexicanos Deportados con Experiencia Carcelaria en México.” Mexican Studies, 32 (2): 302–320. 10.1525/mex.2016.32.2.302
    https://doi.org/10.1525/mex.2016.32.2.302 [Google Scholar]
  24. París, María Dolores
    2010Procesos de repatriación. Experiencias de las personas devueltas por las autoridades estadounidenses. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramanathan, Vaidehi
    2013 Language Policies and (Dis)Citizenship: Who Belongs? Who is guest? Who is Deported?Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 12: 162–166. 10.1080/15348458.2013.797250
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2013.797250 [Google Scholar]
  26. Richard Devlin and Pothier, Dianne
    2006 “Introduction: Towards a Critical Theory of Dis-Citizenship.” InCritical Disability Theory: Essays in Philosophy, Politics, Policy and Law, ed. byDianne Pothier and Richard Devlin, 1–24. Vancouver-Toronto, Canada: UBC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rumbaut, Rubén
    2004 “Ages, Life Stages, and Generational Cohorts: Decomposing the Immigrant First and Second Generations in the United States”. International Migration Review, 38 (3): 1160–1205. 10.1111/j.1747‑7379.2004.tb00232.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00232.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Stroud, Cristopher
    2001 “African Mother-tongue Programs and the Politics of Language: Linguistic Citizenship versus Linguistic Human Rights”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(4): 339–355. 10.1080/01434630108666440
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630108666440 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018 “Linguistic citizenship.” InThe Multilingual Citizen. Towards a Politics of Language for Agency and Change, ed. byLisa Lim, Cristopher Stroud, and Lionel Wee, 17–39. Bristol, UK: Encounters. 10.21832/9781783099665‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099665-004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor, Shelley; Despagne, Colette and Faez, Farahnaz
    2018 “Critical Language Awareness”. InJohn I. Liontas (Ed.), TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–14. doi:  10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0660
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0660 [Google Scholar]
  31. Unzueta, Carrasco and Hinda Seif
    2014 “Disrupting the Dream: Undocumented Youth Reframe Citizenship and Deportability through Anti-deportation activism.” Latino Studies, 12(2): 279–299. 10.1057/lst.2014.21
    https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2014.21 [Google Scholar]
  32. Vincent, Andrew
    2002Nationalism and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Valdés, Guadalupe
    2001 “Heritage Language Students: Profiles and Possibilities”, ed. byJoy Kreeft Peyton, Donald A. Ranard and Scott McGinnisinHeritage Languages in America. Preserving a National Resource37–80. United States: CAL and Delta Systems Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wee, Lionel
    2018 “Essentialism and language rights”. InL. Lim, C. Stroud & L. Wee (eds.), The multilingual citizen. Towards a politics of language for agency and change, edited byL. Lim, C. Stroud & L. Wee, 40–64. Bristol, UK: Encounters. 10.21832/9781783099665‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099665-005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael
    2015 Chapter 1: Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, Los Angeles: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zentella, Ana Celia
    1995 ”The “Chiquitafication” of U.S. Latinos and Their Languages, OR Why We Need an Anthropological Linguistics”. Paper presented atSALSA III at the University of Texas, Austin, Symposium about Language and Society, April 7–9, 1995. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416671.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21004.jac
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21004.jac
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error