1887
image of When in parliamentary debate there is no debate
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

On the 1st October 2017 an independence referendum was organised in Catalonia. The aim of this paper is to analyse the nature of the political debate going on in the Catalan Parliament during the whole process by focusing on the kind of argumentation strategies that were used by each of the leanings to legitimise their political decisions. We do that relying on a methodological distinction that differentiates between sound argumentation and fallacious argumentation. By using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach, this study offers a wide picture of the kind of argumentation used by the main political actors involved in the process of decision making in Catalonia. The results show that there is more emphasis in antagonising with the others, than engaging in sound argument exchange that could facilitate minimal points of consensus. Such results may help explain why the Catalan conflict is still unsolved at the political level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
2021-10-18
2021-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aja, Eliseo, and César Colino
    2014 “Multilevel Structures, Coordination and Partisan Politics in Spanish Intergovernmental Relations.” Comparative European Politics12 (4): 444–67. 10.1057/cep.2014.9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.9 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson
    2019Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford University. 10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Basta, Karlo
    2020 “Time’s Up! : Framing Collective Impatience for Radical Political Change.” Political Psychology41 (4): 755–70. 10.1111/pops.12649
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12649 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bischof, Karin, and Cornelia Ilie
    2018 “Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics17 (5): 585–93. 10.1075/jlp.00017.edi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.00017.edi [Google Scholar]
  5. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2005 “Persuasion, legitimacy and leadership.” Politicians and rhetoric. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1–31. 10.1057/9780230501706_1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706_1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dardanelli, Paolo
    2019 “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Mapping State Structures---with an Application to Western Europe 1950--2015.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism49 (2): 271–98. 10.1093/publius/pjy019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy019 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dearden, Lizzie
    2017 “893 People Now Injured in Catalan Referendum Violence, The Independent, 2 October.” Retrieved20: 2020. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/catalan-referendum-police-clashes-violence-900-injured-government-independence-vote-banned-latest-a7978166.html
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Della Porta, Donatella and Francis O’Connor
    2017Social Movements and Referendums from below: Direct Democracy in the Neoliberal Crisis. London: Policy Press. 10.1332/policypress/9781447333418.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447333418.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Della Porta, Donatella and Martín Portos
    2020 “A Bourgeois Story? The Class Basis of Catalan Independentism.” Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–21. 10.1080/21622671.2020.1737208
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1737208 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dryzek, John S., and Simon Niemeyer
    2010Pluralism and Meta-Consensus. InFoundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562947.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562947.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Elias, Anwen, Edina Szöcsik, and Christina Isabel Zuber
    2015 “Position, Selective Emphasis and Framing: How Parties Deal with a Second Dimension in Competition.” Party Politics21 (6): 839–50. 10.1177/1354068815597572
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815597572 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernández-García, Belén and Óscar G. Luengo
    2018 “Populist parties in Western Europe. An analysis of the three core elements of populism”. Communication & Society31(3): 57–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Ricard Zapata-Barrero
    2014 “Catalunya Terra d’acollida: Stateless Nationalist Parties Discourses on Immigration.” InThe Politics of Immigration in Multi-Level States: Governance and Political Parties, edited byE. Hepburn and R. Zapata-Barrero, 261–84. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137358530_13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137358530_13 [Google Scholar]
  14. Franco-Guillén, Núria, and Gema Rubio-Carbonero
    . Forthcoming. “Narratives of the Process: Parliamentary debates on Catalonia’s referendum of 2017”. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gamper Sachse, Daniel
    2018 “Ambivalences of Populism: The Case of Catalan Independentism.” Social Science Information57 (4): 573–87. 10.1177/0539018418811685
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018418811685 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heras-Pedrosa, Carlos de las, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez, and Elena Millán-Celis
    2020 “Populism and Independence Movements in Europe: The Catalan-Spanish Case.” Social Sciences9 (4): 1–20. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i4p35-d338406.html
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Innerarity, Daniel, and Ander Errasti
    2019 “Decide on What? Addressing Secessionist Claims in an Interdependent Europe.” InBetween Democracy and Law, edited byMargiotta, C. & Martinico, G., Closa, C., 61–83. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429032400‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032400-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Issel-Dombert, Sandra
    2020 “Sprachen Im Kontakt--Sprachen Im Konflikt: Agonale Zentren Im Spanischen Und Katalanischen Unabhängigkeitsdiskurs (2017–2019).” PhiN-Beiheft22: 73.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kienpointner, Manfred, and Walther Kindt
    1997 “On the Problem of Bias in Political Argumentation: An Investigation into Discussions about Political Asylum in Germany and Austria.” Journal of Pragmatics27 (5): 555–85. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00035‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00035-5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kraus, Peter A., and Joan Vergés-Gifra
    ed. 2017The Catalan Process: Sovereignty, Self-Determination and Democracy in the 21st Century. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Autonomics.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mudde, Cas
    2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition39 (4): 541–63. 10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2004.00135.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Oswald, Steve, and Thierre Herman
    2020 “Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing.” InFrom Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild, edited byF H Van Eemeren and B. Garssen, 41–62. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28367‑4_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28367-4_4 [Google Scholar]
  23. Parkinson, John, Sebastian De Laile, and Núria Franco-Guillén
    2020 “Mapping Deliberative Systems with Big Data: The Case of the Scottish Independence Referendum.” Political Studies, December. 10.1177/0032321720976266
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720976266 [Google Scholar]
  24. Reisigl, Martin
    2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach A Methodological Framework.” InContemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited byChris Hart and Piotr Cap, 67–96. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Requejo, Ferran, and Miquel Caminal
    2012Federalism, Plurinationality and Democratic Constitutionalism: Theory and Cases. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203157244
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203157244 [Google Scholar]
  27. Reyes, Antonio
    2020 “Spain vs. Catalonia: normalizing democracy through police intervention.” Social Semiotics30(4): 485–502. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1762985
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1762985 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rokkan, Stein, and Derek W. Urwin
    1983Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rubio-Carbonero, Gema
    2020 “Subtle discriminatory political discourse on immigration”. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(6): 893–914. 10.1075/jlp.19069.rub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19069.rub [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruiz Casado, Juan Alberto
    2019 “Articulations of Populism and Nationalism: The Case of the Catalan Independence Movement.” European Politics and Society, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Serrano, Ivan
    2013 “Just a Matter of Identity? Support for Independence in Catalonia” Regional & Federal Studies23 (5): 523–45. 10.1080/13597566.2013.775945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.775945 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shibata, Masaki
    2020 “Why do politicians cite others in political debates?: A functional analysis of reported speech in a Japanese political debate.” Journal of Language and Politics19(4): 604–623. 10.1075/jlp.19061.shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19061.shi [Google Scholar]
  33. Swan, Coree B., and Daniel Cetrà
    2020 “Why Stay Together? State Nationalism and Justifications for State Unity in Spain and the UK.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics26 (1): 46–65. 10.1080/13537113.2020.1716443
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2020.1716443 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tronconi, Filippo
    2006 “Ethnic Identity and Party Competition. An Analysis of the Electoral Performance of Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe.” World Political Science2: 2. 10.2202/1935‑6226.1010
    https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-6226.1010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Dijk, Teunis A.
    1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2018Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
  37. Walton, Douglas
    2007Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619311
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619311 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd Edn. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error