1887
image of “We shall not flag or fail, we shall go on to the end”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Focusing on the anti-extradition bill protests in Hong Kong, this article presents an analysis of Twitter posts adopting the hashtags #antiELAB, #NoChinaExtradition and #HongKongProtests. The analysis explores the public narrative among the collective identity of Hongkongers opposing the extradition bill as events unfolded during mid-2019 in Hong Kong. To do so, we adopt multi-perspective framework for the Discourse of Illusion, which takes a three-prong approach to the study of argument construction and establishing legitimacy. Specifically, through the interrelated components of (1) historicity, (2) linguistic and semiotic action, and (3) social impact, the dimensions of the hashtag narrative that emerged on Twitter were explored.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21020.bha
2021-10-05
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, Laurence
    2016 AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. www.laurenceanthony.net
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, Lance W., and Alexandra Segerberg
    2012 “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society15 (5): 739–768. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, Aditi
    2015Discursive Illusions in Public Discourse: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315776903
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776903 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2018 “Digital Narratives of Struggle and Legitimacy in the Arab Spring”. InParticipatory Digital Cultures and Contemporary Discourses of (De)Legitimization, eds. byDamian Rivers, and Andrew Ross, 150–168. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351263887‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351263887-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1990The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Breuer, Anita, Todd Landman, and Dorothea Farquhar
    2015 “Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution.” Democratization22 (4): 764–792. 10.1080/13510347.2014.885505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.885505 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carfantan, Serge
    2003 “Philosophy and Spirituality.” Available at: philospir.pagesperso-orange.fr/Lesson7.htm
  9. Chan, Athena, and Rachel Yeo
    2019 “How extradition bill protests have united locals and ethnic minorities in Hong Kong.” South China Morning Post, July 6, 2019. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3017348/how-extradition-bill-protests-have-united-locals-and-ethnic
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cialdini, Robert B.
    1997 “Interpersonal Influence.” InPsychological Insights and Perspectives, ed. bySharon, Shavitt, and Timothy C. Brock, 195–217. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci
    2021 “The Principle of (Im) politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics175 (2021): 146–164. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekström, Mats, and Adam Shehata
    2018 “Social Media, Porous Boundaries, and the Development of Online Political Engagement Among Young Citizens.” New Media & Society20 (2): 740–759. 10.1177/1461444816670325
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816670325 [Google Scholar]
  13. Freelon, Deen, Charlton D. McIlwain, and Meredith Clark
    2016Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice. Center for Media and Social Impact, School of Communication, American University, Washington, DC. Available at: cmsimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/beyond_the_hashtags_2016.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Logan Molyneux, and Pei Zheng
    2014 “Social media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships.” Journal of Communication64 (4): 612–634. 10.1111/jcom.12103
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103 [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo, Chao, and Gregory D. Saxton
    2014 “Tweeting Social Change: How Social Media Are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43 (1): 57–79. 10.1177/0899764012471585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012471585 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hands, Joss
    2011@ is for Activism: Dissent, Resistance and Rebellion in a Digital Culture. London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansson, Sten
    2018 “The Discursive Micro-Politics of Blame Avoidance: Unpacking the Language of Government Blame Games.” Policy Sciences51 (4): 545–564. 10.1007/s11077‑018‑9335‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9335-3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong, Sounman, and Sun Hyoung Kim
    2016 “Political Polarization on Twitter: Implications for the Use of Social Media in Digital Governments.” Government Information Quarterly33 (4): 777–782. 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson, Sarah J., and Brooke Foucault Welles
    2015 “Hijacking# myNYPD: Social media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics.” Journal of Communication65 (6): 932–952. 10.1111/jcom.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laikwan, Pang
    2020 “Identity Politics and Democracy in Hong Kong’s Social Unrest.” Feminist Studies46 (1): 206–215. 10.15767/feministstudies.46.1.0206
    https://doi.org/10.15767/feministstudies.46.1.0206 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lazar, Anita, and Michelle M. Lazar
    2004 “The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the Double Face of Threat.” Discourse & Society15 (2–3): 223–242. 10.1177/0957926504041018
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041018 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland and Jiří Nekvapil
    2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society15 (2–3): 243–266. 10.1177/0957926504041019
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041019 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
    2011 “Practical Historians and Adversaries: 9/11 revisited.” Discourse & Society22 (1): 66–85. 10.1177/0957926510382840
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382840 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matuszewski, Paweł, and Gabriella Szabó
    2019 “Are Echo Chambers Based on Partisanship? Twitter and Political Polarity in Poland and Hungary.” Social Media+ Society5 (2): 2056305119837671. 10.1177/2056305119837671
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119837671 [Google Scholar]
  26. Melucci, Alberto
    1995 “The Process of Collective Identity.” InSocial Movements and Cultureed. byJohnston, Hank, and Bert Klandermans, 41–63. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller, Vincent
    2017 “Phatic Culture and the Status Quo: Reconsidering the Purpose of Social Media Activism.” Convergence23 (3), 251–269. doi:  10.1177/1354856515592512
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592512 [Google Scholar]
  28. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2010A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Penney, Joel, and Caroline Dadas
    2014 “(Re)Tweeting in the Service of Protest: Digital Composition and Circulation in the Occupy Wall Street movement.” New Media & Society16 (1): 74–90. doi:  10.1177/1461444813479593
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813479593 [Google Scholar]
  30. Perloff, Richard M.
    1993The Dynamics of Persuasion, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410606884
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606884 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin
    2003 “Categorization and Explanation of Risk: A Discourse Analytical Perspective.” Health, Risk & Society5 (2): 115–124. 10.1080/1369857031000123902
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369857031000123902 [Google Scholar]
  32. Simon, Roger
    1999Gramsci’s Political Thought: An Introduction. London: The Electric Book Company Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tam, Luisa
    2019 “Carrie Lam’s Clumsy Parenting Analogy Was Designed to Take Sting Out of Extradition Bill Protests, but Only Burns Relations with Hong Kong Mothers.” South China Morning Post, June 17, 2019. https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3014863/carrie-lams-clumsy-parenting-analogy-was-designed-take-sting
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tomasello, Michael, and Henrike Moll
    2010 “The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture.” InMind the gaped. byKalppeler, Peter M. and Silk, Joan, 331–349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑02725‑3_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_16 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vukovich, Daniel
    2020 “A Sound and Fury Signifying Mediatisation: On the Hong Kong Protests, 2019.” Javnost – The Public27 (2): 200–209. 10.1080/13183222.2020.1727278
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1727278 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wallaschek, Stefan
    2020 “The Discursive Construction of Solidarity: Analysing Public Claims in Europe’s Migration Crisis.” Political Studies68 (1): 74–92. 10.1177/0032321719831585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719831585 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, and Martin Reisigl
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society10 (2): 149–173. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Xenos, Michael, Ariadne Vromen, and Brian D. Loader
    2014 “The Great Equalizer? Patterns of Social Media Use and Youth Political Engagement in Three Advanced Democracies.” Information, Communication & Society17 (2): 151–167. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318 [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang, Guobin
    2016 “Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of# BlackLivesMatter.” Media and Communication4 (4): 13–17. 10.17645/mac.v4i4.692
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ying, Pei
    2014 “Hong Kong’s Identity Crisis.” The Diplomat, November 1, 2014. https://thediplomat.com/2014/11/hong-kongs-identity-crisis/
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21020.bha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21020.bha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error