1887
image of Populating ‘solidarity’ in political debate
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The article examines the various ways in which ‘solidarity’ is invoked and signified through narrative and categorial devices in a political debate following the UK’s vote to leave the EU in 2016. Analysing a floor debate in the European Parliament concerning a white paper released by the European Commission on the future of the EU held in March 2017, we investigate how politicians deploy references to ‘solidarity’ in service of different political agendas. Our research highlights the strategic use of ‘core’ values in political debate through the way different speakers appeal to ‘solidarity’ as a self-evident positive value within the EU, but which is then mobilised through different relevant actors and scenarios to argue contrastive political positions. Our analysis demonstrates how narrative positioning and category-bound normative expectations are harnessed to serve the aims of political persuasion by “populating” a shared principle of governance with purposeful sets of identities and interrelations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
2022-03-11
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alasuutari, Pertti
    2015 “Tithe Discursive side of new institutionalism.” Cultural Sociology9(2): 162–184. 10.1177/1749975514561805
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alasuutari, Pertti and Ali Qadir
    2014 ”Epistemic governance.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology1(1): 67–84. 10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, Mihail M.
    1981 “Discourse in the Novel.” InThe Dialogic Imagination, ed. byMichael Holquist, 259–301. Austin TX: Texas University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, Michael
    1997 “Positioning Between Structure and Performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life History7(1–4), 335–342. 10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnett, Michael N. and Martha Finnemore
    1999 “The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations.” International organization53 (4): 699–732. 10.1162/002081899551048
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551048 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boli, John, and George M. Thomas
    1999Constructing world culture. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carta, Caterina, and Ruth Wodak
    2015 “Discourse analysis, policy analysis, and the borders of EU identity.” Journal of Language and Politics14(1): 1–17. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.01car [Google Scholar]
  8. Clayman, Steven E. and John Heritage
    2002The News Interview. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dieckmann, Walther
    1969Sprache in der Politik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Napoli, Ester, and Deborah Russo
    2018 “Solidarity in the European Union in Times of Crisis.” InSolidarity as a Public Virtue?, ed. byVeronica Federico and Christian Lahusen, 193–248. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. 10.5771/9783845290058‑194
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845290058-194 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisenberg, Eric. M.
    1984 “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.” Communication monographs, 51(3): 227–242. 10.1080/03637758409390197
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197 [Google Scholar]
  12. Engel, Jakob and Wodak, Ruth
    (2013) “Calculated ambivalence and Holocaust denial in Austria”. InAnalysing Fascist Discourse, ed byRuth Wodak and John E. Richarson, 83–106. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Finnemore, Martha
    1993 “International organizations as teachers of norms.” International organization47(4): 565–597. 10.1017/S0020818300028101
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028101 [Google Scholar]
  14. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink
    1998 “International norm dynamics and political change.” International organization52(4): 887–917. 10.1162/002081898550789
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley
    (Eds.) 2015Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781473917873
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitzgerald, Richard, and William Housley, W.
    (Eds.) 2009Media, Policy and Interaction. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Furness, Mark, Luciana-Alexandra Ghica, Simon Lightfoot, Balázs Szent-Iványi
    2020 “EU development policy: evolving as an instrument of foreign policy and as an expression of solidarity.“ Journal of Contemporary European Research16(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1156. 10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1156
    https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1156 [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerhards, Jürgen, Holger Lengfeld, Zsofia S. Ignácz, Florian K. Kley, and Maximiliam Priem
    2021European Solidarity in Times of Crisis. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Grimmel, Andreas
    2019Solidarity and European Union Politics. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1121
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1121 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grimmel, Andreas, and Susan My Giang
    2017Solidarity in the European Union. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑57036‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hester, Steven and Peter Eglin
    (Eds.) 1997Culture-in-Action. Lanham UPA.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2007 “Categorization, interaction, policy and debate.” Critical Discourse Studies4(2): 187–206. 10.1080/17405900701464840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464840 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones, Erik
    2012 “JCMS Annual Review Lecture: European crisis, European solidarity.” Journal of Common Market Studies, 50: 53–67. 10.1111/j.1468‑5965.2012.02272.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02272.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Karttunen, Laura
    2015 The Hypothetical in Literature: Emotion and Emplotment. Doctoral Dissertation (Literary Studies). University of Tampere.
  27. Keel, Sara, and Lorenza Mondada
    2017 “The micro-politics of sequential organization.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (1): 1–18. 10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee [Google Scholar]
  28. Karagiannis, Nathalie
    2007European solidarity. Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kontochristou, Maria, and Evi Mascha
    2014 “The Euro crisis and the question of solidarity in the European Union.” Rev. Eur. Stud., 6, 50. 10.5539/res.v6n2p50
    https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n2p50 [Google Scholar]
  30. Krzyżanowski, Michael
    2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse.” Discourse & Society27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  31. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lahusen, Christian and Maria T. Grasso
    (Eds.) 2018Solidarity in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑73335‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73335-7 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laitinen, Arto, and Anne B. Pessi
    2014 “Solidarity: theory and practice.” InSolidarity. Theory and practice, ed. byArto Laitinen and Anne B. Pessi, 1–29. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Leudar, Ivan and Jiri Nekvapil
    2004 Media dialogical networks and political argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(2), 247–266. 10.1075/jlp.3.2.06leu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.2.06leu [Google Scholar]
  35. Manners, Ian
    2008 “The Normative Ethics of the European Union.” International affairs, 45–60. 10.1111/j.1468‑2346.2008.00688.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00688.x [Google Scholar]
  36. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen
    1998 “The institutional dynamics of international political orders.” International organization, 943–969. 10.1162/002081898550699
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699 [Google Scholar]
  37. McNamara, Kathleen R.
    2017The Politics of Everyday Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nekvapil, Jiri, Petr Kaderka, and Simon Smith
    Eds. (Forthcoming). The changing shape of media dialogical networks.” Discourse, Context and Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Powell, Walter W. and Paul DiMaggio
    1991The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rautajoki, Hanna
    2009 “Staging Public Discussion.” InMedia, Policy and Interaction, ed. byRichard Fitzgerald and William Housley, 88–109. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2012 “Membership Categorization as a Tool for Moral Casting in TV Discussion.” Discourse Studies, 14 (2): 243–260. 10.1177/1461445611433637
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433637 [Google Scholar]
  42. . In review. “The relational scaffolding of justifications in policy-making: Deploying the multi standard of identifications in EU policy negotiation.”
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sacks, Harvey
    1972 “On the analyzability of stories by children.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics, ed. byJohn Gumberz and Dell Hymes, 329–345. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1995Lectures on Conversation: VolumesI & II, ed.G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444328301
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sangiovanni, Andrea
    2013 “Solidarity in the European Union.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33 (2): 213–241. 10.1093/ojls/gqs033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs033 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt, Vivien
    2008 “Discursive Institutionalism.” Annual Review of Political Science11: 303–326. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre
    1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Steinworth, Ulrich
    2017 “Applying the idea of solidarity to Europe.” InSolidarity in the European Union, ed. byAndreas Grimmel, and Susan My Giang, 9–19. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑57036‑5_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  49. Trein, Philip
    2020 “Federal dynamics, solidarity, and European Union crisis politics.” Journal of European Public Policy27 (7): 977–994. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1640272
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1640272 [Google Scholar]
  50. Verhaegen, Soetkin
    2018 “What to expect from European identity?” Comparative European Politics16 (5): 871–904. 10.1057/s41295‑017‑0106‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0106-x [Google Scholar]
  51. Wallaschek, Stefan
    2019 “Solidarity in Europe in times of crisis.” Journal of European Integration41 (2): 257–263. 10.1080/07036337.2019.1546980
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1546980 [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams, Raymond
    1976Keywords. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zappettini, Franco, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2019 “The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses.” Critical Discourse Studies16 (4): 381–388. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error