1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 5
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

U.S. journalism during the Trump era has experienced numerous legitimacy attacks by the leading political figure. Building on the concepts of institutional legitimacy and intentional trust, this study analyzes legitimation narratives in projections of journalism’s future, using the Harvard University’s NiemanLab Predictions of Journalism from 2017 to 2021. Projectory narratives are meaningful constructions of a field’s future and provide guidance for its actors. The qualitative analysis of a Trump-related subset of predictions (ca.  = 130) convey (1) confrontational narratives of threat, self-reproach, and epistemological authority loss. Confrontational narratives serve to secure consent for suggested transparency and audience relationship building solutions. These (2) solution narratives represent trustification strategies. Lastly, (3) survival narratives aim at regaining authority and agency through legacy mythopoesis and the construction of a cautiously optimistic post-Trump outlook for journalism. Hence, the analysis of projectory narratives reveals how an organizational field collectively prepares for change to regain legitimacy.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
2021-07-07
2025-01-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlp.21031.lis.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andrew, Blake C.
    2007 “Media-Generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-Information Rationality?” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12 (2): 24–43. doi:  10.1177/1081180X07299795
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07299795 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bitektine, Alex, and Patrick Haack
    2015 “The “Macro” and the “Micro” of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process.” Academy of Management Review40 (1): 49–75. doi:  10.5465/amr.2013.0318
     https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318 [Google Scholar]
  3. Broersma, Marcel
    2019 “The Legitimacy Paradox.” Journalism20 (1): 92–94. doi:  10.1177/1464884918806736
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918806736 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burrowes, Carl Patrick
    2011 “Property, Power and Press Freedom: Emergence of the Fourth Estate, 1640–1789.” Journalism & Communication Monographs13 (1): 2–66. 10.1177/152263791101300102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/152263791101300102 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson, Matt
    2016 “Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation.” Commun Theor26 (4): 349–68. doi:  10.1111/comt.12088
     https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12088 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson, Matt, Sue Robinson, and Seth C. Lewis
    2020 “Digital Press Criticism: The Symbolic Dimensions of Donald Trump’s Assault on U.S. Journalists as the “Enemy of the People”.” Digital Journalism, 1–18. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981 [Google Scholar]
  7. Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss
    2008 Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed.Los Angeles: Sage. 10.4135/9781452230153
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153 [Google Scholar]
  8. DiMaggio, Paul J.
    1988 “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” InInstitutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited byLynne G. Zucker. 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell
    1983 “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48 (2): 147–60. 10.2307/2095101
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar]
  10. Domke, D., Mark D. Watts, D. V. Shah, and D. P. Fan
    1999 “The Politics of Conservative Elites and the ‘Liberal Media’ Argument.” J Commun49 (4): 35–58. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02816.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Loes Aaldering, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, and Sophie Lecheler
    2020 “From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in Their Reporting.” Journalism Stud. 21 (10): 1323–43. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667 [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, Michel
    1977 The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Gills, Barry, Heikki Patomäki, and Jamie Morgan
    2019 “President Trump as Status Dysfunction.” Organization26 (2): 291–301. doi:  10.1177/1350508418815419
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418815419 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallin, Daniel C.
    2019 “Mediatisation, Neoliberalism and Populisms: The Case of Trump.” Contemporary Social Science14 (1): 14–25. doi:  10.1080/21582041.2018.1426404
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426404 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamilton, James T.
    2004 All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400841417
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841417 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanitzsch, Thomas
    2007 “Deconstructing Journalism Culture: Toward a Universal Theory.” Commun Theor17 (4): 367–85. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2007.00303.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Hanitzsch, Thomas, and Tim P. Vos
    2017 “Journalistic Roles and the Struggle over Institutional Identity: The Discursive Constitution of Journalism.” Commun Theor27 (2): 115–35. doi:  10.1111/comt.12112
     https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12112 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackson, Jonathan, and Jacinta M. Gau
    2016 “Carving up Concepts? Differentiating Between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes Towards Legal Authority.” InInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, edited byEllie Shockley, Tess M. Neal, Lisa M. PytlikZillig, and Brian H. Bornstein. 49–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑22261‑5_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Karlsson, Michael, and Christer Clerwall
    2019 “Cornerstones in Journalism.” Journalism Stud. 20 (8): 1184–99. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2018.1499436
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1499436 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, Sora, and Scott Rader
    2010 “What They Can Do Versus How Much They Care.” JCOM14 (1): 59–80. doi:  10.1108/13632541011017816
     https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541011017816 [Google Scholar]
  21. Koliska, Michael, Kalyani Chadha, and Alison Burns
    2020 “Talking Back: Journalists Defending Attacks Against Their Profession in the Trump Era.” Journalism Studies35 (2): 1–18. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190 [Google Scholar]
  22. Korkeamäki, Lauri, and Marko Kohtamäki
    2020 “To Outcomes and Beyond: Discursively Managing Legitimacy Struggles in Outcome Business Models.” Industrial Marketing Management91:196–208. doi:  10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.023
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.023 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” JLP16 (4): 607–18. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
  24. Ladd, Jonathan M.
    2012 Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 10.1515/9781400840359
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840359 [Google Scholar]
  25. Landau, Dana, Israel Drori, and Siri Terjesen
    2014 “Multiple Legitimacy Narratives and Planned Organizational Change.” Human Relations67 (11): 1321–45. doi:  10.1177/0018726713517403
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713517403 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, Taeku, and Christian Hosam
    2020 “Fake News Is Real: The Significance and Sources of Disbelief in Mainstream Media in Trump’s America.” Sociol Forum35 (S1): 996–1018. doi:  10.1111/socf.12603
     https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12603 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lischka, Juliane A.
    2019 “A Badge of Honor? How the New York Times Discredits President Trump’s Fake News Accusations.” Journalism Studies20 (2): 287–304. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2017.1375385
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1375385 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020 “Fluid Institutional Logics in Digital Journalism.” Journal of Media Business Studies17 (2): 113–31. doi:  10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764
     https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764 [Google Scholar]
  29. Maurer, John G.
    1971 Readings in Organization Theory: Open-System Approaches: Random House (NY).
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Messeri, Lisa, and Janet Vertesi
    2015 “The Greatest Missions Never Flown: Anticipatory Discourse and the “Projectory” in Technological Communities.” Technology and Culture56 (1): 54–85. doi:  10.1353/tech.2015.0023
     https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0023 [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan
    1977 “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” The American Journal of Sociology83 (2): 340–63. 10.1086/226550
     https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 [Google Scholar]
  32. Munger, Kevin
    2020 “All the News That’s Fit to Click: The Economics of Clickbait Media.” Political Communication37 (3): 376–97. doi:  10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1687626 [Google Scholar]
  33. Myllylahti, Merja
    2020 “Paying Attention to Attention: A Conceptual Framework for Studying News Reader Revenue Models Related to Platforms.” Digital Journalism8 (5): 567–75. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2019.1691926
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1691926 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis
    2017 “The One Thing Journalism Just Might Do for Democracy.” Journalism Studies18 (10): 1251–62. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152 [Google Scholar]
  35. Perdomo, Gabriela, and Philippe Rodrigues-Rouleau
    2021 “Transparency as Metajournalistic Performance: The New York Times’ Caliphate Podcast and New Ways to Claim Journalistic Authority.” Journalism. doi:  10.1177/1464884921997312
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921997312 [Google Scholar]
  36. Picard, Robert G.
    2004 “Commercialism and Newspaper Quality.” Newspaper Research Journal25 (1): 54–65. 10.1177/073953290402500105
     https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290402500105 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
    2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society4 (2): 1–12. doi:  10.1177/2056305118776010
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ruotsalainen, Juho
    2018 “Scanning the Shape of Journalism – Emerging Trends, Changing Culture?” Futures104:14–24. doi:  10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Said, Edward W.
    1986 “Foucault and the Imagination of Power.” InFoucault: A Critical Reader, edited byEdward W. Said and David C. Hoy. 149–55. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Shin, Wooyeol, Changwook Kim, and Jaewon Joo
    2020 “Hating Journalism: Anti-Press Discourse and Negative Emotions Toward Journalism in Korea.” Journalism, 146488492098572. doi:  10.1177/1464884920985729
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985729 [Google Scholar]
  41. Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin
    1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Suchman, Mark C.
    1995 “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review20 (3): 571–610. doi:  10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
     https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti, and Tine Ustad Figenschou
    2020 “The Alarmed Citizen: Fear, Mistrust, and Alternative Media.” Journalism Practice, 1–18. doi:  10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tong, Jingrong
    2018 “Journalistic Legitimacy Revisited: Collapse or Revival in the Digital Age?” Digital Journalism6 (2): 256–73. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2017.1360785
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360785 [Google Scholar]
  45. Vaara, Eero, and Janne Tienari
    2011 “On the Narrative Construction of Multinational Corporations: An Antenarrative Analysis of Legitimation and Resistance in a Cross-Border Merger.” Organization Science22 (2): 370–90. doi:  10.1287/orsc.1100.0593
     https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0593 [Google Scholar]
  46. Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
    2006 “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies27 (6): 789–813. doi:  10.1177/0170840606061071
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606061071 [Google Scholar]
  47. van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies1 (1): 83–118. doi:  10.1177/1461445699001001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wagemans, Andrea, Tamara Witschge, and Frank Harbers
    2019 “Impact as Driving Force of Journalistic and Social Change.” Journalism20 (4): 552–567. doi:  10.1177/1464884918770538
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918770538 [Google Scholar]
  49. Waisbord, Silvio, and Adriana Amado
    2017 “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information, Communication & Society20 (9): 1330–46. doi:  10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521 [Google Scholar]
  50. Watts, Mark D., D. Domke, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan
    1999 “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns.” Communication Research26 (2): 144–75. doi:  10.1177/009365099026002003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003 [Google Scholar]
  51. Whipple, Kelsey N., and Jeremy L. Shermak
    2020 “The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Tweet: How #NotTheEnemy Twitter Discourse Defended the Journalistic Paradigm.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97 (1): 188–210. doi:  10.1177/1077699019851755
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019851755 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wodak, Ruth, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral
    eds. 2013 Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Zimmerman, Monica A., and Gerald J. Zeitz
    2002 “Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy.” The Academy of Management Review27 (3): 414–31. doi:  10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
     https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389921 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
Loading
Fighting an indestructible monster
Journal of Language and Politics 20, 803 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): digital journalism; discourse; disinformation; fake news; future; legitimacy; politics; renewal; Trump; truth

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error