1887
Volume 20, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses. Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’ types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
2021-07-16
2021-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Rawi, Ahmed
    2019 “Gatekeeping Fake News Discourses on Mainstream Media Versus Social Media.” Social Science Computer Review37, no.6: 687–704. 10.1177/0894439318795849
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318795849 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allcott, Hunt, & Matthew Gentzkow
    2017 “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.” Journal of economic perspectives31, no.2: 211–36. 10.1257/jep.31.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldino, Daniel, & Jarrad Goold
    2014 “Iran and the emergence of information and communications technology: the evolution of revolution?.” Australian Journal of International Affairs68, no.1: 17–35. 10.1080/10357718.2013.840263
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840263 [Google Scholar]
  4. BBC
    BBC 2020a “Peskov: obvineniya vlastei v otravlenii Navalnogo – pustoi shum.” (Peskov: accusations of the poisoning of Navalny are empty noise.). August 25, 2020. https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-53903583
  5. BBC
    BBC 2020b “Belarus election: Opposition leader Tikhanovskaya left ‘for sake of her children’”. August 12, 2020. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53733330
  6. Bidder, Benjamin & Christian Esch [Google Scholar]
  7. Blondel, Vincent D., Jean Loup Guillaume, Renauld Lambiotte, & Etienne Lefebvre
    2008 “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks” Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, no.10: P10008. 10.1088/1742‑5468/2008/10/P10008
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucher, Taina, & Anne Helmond
    2017 “The affordances of social media platforms.” InSAGE handbook of social media, edited byJean Burgess, Alice Marwick, & Thomas Poell, 233–253. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burns, Axel, & Ben Eltham
    2009 “Twitter free Iran: An evaluation of Twitter’s role in public diplomacy and information operations in Iran’s 2009 election crisis.” In: Communications Policy & Research Forum 2009, 19th-20th November 2009, University of Technology, Sydney, 298–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Carpentier, Nico
    2018 “Diversifying the Other: Antagonism, agonism and the multiplicity of articulations of self and other.” In: Current Perspectives on communication and media research, edited byLaura Peja, Nico Carpentier, Fausto Colombo, Maria Francesca Murru, Simone Tosoni, Richard Kilborn, Leif Kramp, Risto Kunelius, Anthony McNicholas, Hannu Nieminen, and Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, 145–162. Bremen: edition lumière.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dehghan, Ehsan
    2020 “Networked Discursive Alliances: Antagonism, Agonism, and the Dynamics of Discursive Struggles in the Australian Twittersphere.” PhD diss.Queensland University of Technology 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dehghan, Ehsan, Axel Bruns, Peta Mitchell, & Brenda Moon
    2020 “Discourse analytical studies on social media platforms: A data-driven mixed-methods approach”. InProdusing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory. Vol 3, edited byRebecca Ann Lind, 159–177. Peter Lang Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Leos Aaldering, Jakob Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, & Sophie Lecheler
    2020 “From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting”. Journalism Studies21, no.10: 1323–1343. 10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667 [Google Scholar]
  14. Egelhofer, Jana Laura, & Sophie Lecheler
    2019 “Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda.” Annals of the International Communication Association43, no.2: 97–116. 10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782 [Google Scholar]
  15. Esser, Frank
    2019 “Advances in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of evidence.” Political Communication36 (4): 680–686. 10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904 [Google Scholar]
  16. Esser, Frank, & Barbara Pfetsch
    2017 “Political communication.” InComparative Politics, edited byDaniele. 327–346. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Farkas, Johan, & Jannick Schou
    2018 “Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood.” Javnost-The Public25, no.3: 298–314. 10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerbaudo, Paolo
    2018 “Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?” Media, Culture & Society40, no.5: 745–53. doi:  10.1177/0163443718772192
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerbaudo, Paolo & Francesco Screti
    2017 “Reclaiming popular sovereignty: the vision of the state in the discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5 Stelle.” Javnost: The Public24, no.4: 320–335. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330089
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330089 [Google Scholar]
  20. Glazunova, Sofya
    2020 “Digital media as a tool for non-systemic opposition in Russia: A case study of Alexey Navalny’s populist communications on YouTube.” PhD diss.Queensland University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hallin, Daniel C., & Paolo Mancini
    2004Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511790867
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kargar, Simin, & Keith McManamen
    2018 “Censorship and collateral damage: Analyzing the Telegram ban in Iran.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication 2018–4 10.2139/ssrn.3244046
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3244046 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kelly, John, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, & John G. Palfrey
    2012 “Mapping Russian Twitter.” Berkman Center Research Publication 2012–3 https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2012/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Laclau, Ernesto, & Chantal Mouffe
    2014Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Trade.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meduza
    Meduza 2020a “Ukrainian intelligence lured suspected Russian mercenaries to Belarus, journalists report.” August 19, 2020. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/08/18/ukrainian-intelligence-lured-suspected-russian-mercenaries-to-belarus-journalists-report
  26. Meduza
    Meduza 2020b “But help came. How the Russian state media rescued Belarusian broadcasters from political pluralism.” September 16, 2020. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2020/09/15/but-help-came
  27. Mouffe, Chantal
    2000The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2005On the Political. Abingdon: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2013Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2015Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pocheptsov, Georgii
    2020 “Novyi tip voiny lezhit v upravlenii obschestvennym diskursom.” (New type of war lies in the management of social discourse). Rezonans, September 15, 2020. https://rezonans.kz/diskursivniye-voyny-chast-1/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pfetsch, Barbara
    2014 “The idea of political communication cultures and its empirical correlates”. InPolitical communication cultures in Europe, edited byBarbara Pfetsch. 13–30. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Roth, Andrew
    2020 “Belarus blues: can Europe’s ‘last dictator’ survive rising discontent?” Guardian. June 16, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/16/slipper-revolution-lukashenkos-reign-under-pressure-in-belarus
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schapals, Aljosha Karim
    2018 “Fake news: Australian and British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of “alternative facts”. Journalism Practice12, no.8: 976–985. 10.1080/17512786.2018.1511822
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1511822 [Google Scholar]
  35. Spaiser, Viktoria, Thomas Chadefaux, Karsten Donnay, Fabian Russmann, & Dirk Helbing
    2017 “Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics14, no.2: 132–153. 10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tandoc, Edson C., Wei Lim Zheng, & Richard Ling
    2018 “Defining ‘Fake News’: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions.” Digital Journalism6, no.2: 137–53. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 [Google Scholar]
  37. Torfing, Jacob
    1999New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek. Vol.301. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. White, Stephen, & Ian McAllister
    2014 “Did Russia (nearly) have a Facebook revolution in 2011? Social media’s challenge to authoritarianism.” Politics34, no.1: 72–84. 10.1111/1467‑9256.12037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12037 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): authoritarian regimes; discourse theory, fake news; propaganda; Twitter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error