Abstract
Abstract
This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods
approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition
generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses.
Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their
use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this
research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’
types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Article metrics loading...
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
2021-07-16
2024-03-28
-
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Full text loading...
References
-
Al-Rawi, Ahmed
2019 “Gatekeeping
Fake News Discourses on Mainstream Media Versus Social Media.”
Social Science Computer
Review37, no.
6: 687–704.
10.1177/0894439318795849
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318795849
[Google Scholar]
-
Allcott, Hunt, & Matthew Gentzkow
2017 “Social
media and fake news in the 2016 election.”
Journal of economic
perspectives31, no.
2: 211–36.
10.1257/jep.31.2.211
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
[Google Scholar]
-
Baldino, Daniel, & Jarrad Goold
2014 “Iran
and the emergence of information and communications technology: the evolution of
revolution?.”
Australian Journal of International
Affairs68, no.
1: 17–35.
10.1080/10357718.2013.840263
https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840263
[Google Scholar]
-
BBC
-
BBC
-
Bidder, Benjamin & Christian Esch
[Google Scholar]
-
Blondel, Vincent
D., Jean
Loup Guillaume, Renauld Lambiotte, & Etienne Lefebvre
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
[Google Scholar]
-
Bucher, Taina, & Anne Helmond
2017 “The
affordances of social media platforms.” InSAGE handbook of social
media, edited byJean Burgess, Alice Marwick, & Thomas Poell, 233–253. London: Sage.
[Google Scholar]
-
Burns, Axel, & Ben Eltham
2009 “Twitter
free Iran: An evaluation of Twitter’s role in public diplomacy and information operations in Iran’s 2009 election
crisis.” In: Communications Policy & Research Forum 2009,
19th-20th November 2009, University of Technology,
Sydney, 298–310.
[Google Scholar]
-
Carpentier, Nico
2018 “Diversifying
the Other: Antagonism, agonism and the multiplicity of articulations of self and
other.” In: Current Perspectives on communication and media
research, edited byLaura Peja, Nico Carpentier, Fausto Colombo, Maria
Francesca Murru, Simone Tosoni, Richard Kilborn, Leif Kramp, Risto Kunelius, Anthony McNicholas, Hannu Nieminen, and Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, 145–162. Bremen: edition
lumière.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dehghan, Ehsan
2020 “Networked
Discursive Alliances: Antagonism, Agonism, and the Dynamics of Discursive Struggles in the Australian
Twittersphere.” PhD diss.Queensland University of
Technology 2020.
[Google Scholar]
-
Dehghan, Ehsan, Axel Bruns, Peta Mitchell, & Brenda Moon
2020 “Discourse
analytical studies on social media platforms: A data-driven mixed-methods
approach”. InProdusing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection
of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory. Vol 3, edited byRebecca
Ann Lind, 159–177. Peter
Lang Publishing.
[Google Scholar]
-
Egelhofer, Jana
Laura, Leos Aaldering, Jakob
Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, & Sophie Lecheler
2020 “From
Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their
Reporting”.
Journalism
Studies21, no.
10: 1323–1343.
10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667
https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745667
[Google Scholar]
-
Egelhofer, Jana
Laura, & Sophie Lecheler
2019 “Fake
news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda.”
Annals of the
International Communication
Association43, no.
2: 97–116.
10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
[Google Scholar]
-
Esser, Frank
2019 “Advances
in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of
evidence.”
Political
Communication36 (4): 680–686.
10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904
[Google Scholar]
-
Esser, Frank, & Barbara Pfetsch
2017 “Political
communication.” InComparative Politics, edited
byDaniele. 327–346. Oxford,
UK: Oxford University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Farkas, Johan, & Jannick Schou
2018 “Fake
news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood.”
Javnost-The
Public25, no.
3: 298–314.
10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
[Google Scholar]
-
Gerbaudo, Paolo
2018 “Social
Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?”
Media, Culture &
Society40, no.
5: 745–53. doi:
10.1177/0163443718772192
https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
[Google Scholar]
-
Gerbaudo, Paolo & Francesco Screti
2017 “Reclaiming
popular sovereignty: the vision of the state in the discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5
Stelle.”
Javnost: The
Public24, no.
4: 320–335.
10.1080/13183222.2017.1330089
https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330089
[Google Scholar]
-
Glazunova, Sofya
2020 “Digital
media as a tool for non-systemic opposition in Russia: A case study of Alexey Navalny’s populist communications on
YouTube.” PhD diss.Queensland University of
Technology.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hallin, Daniel
C., & Paolo Mancini
2004 Comparing
media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511790867
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
[Google Scholar]
-
Kargar, Simin, & Keith McManamen
2018 “Censorship
and collateral damage: Analyzing the Telegram ban in Iran.”
Berkman Klein Center Research
Publication 2018–4
10.2139/ssrn.3244046
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3244046
[Google Scholar]
-
Kelly, John, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, & John
G. Palfrey
[Google Scholar]
-
Laclau, Ernesto, & Chantal Mouffe
2014 Hegemony
and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso
Trade.
[Google Scholar]
-
Meduza
-
Meduza
-
Mouffe, Chantal
2000 The
democratic
paradox. London: Verso.
[Google Scholar]
-
Mouffe, Chantal
2005 On
the Political. Abingdon: Psychology
Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Mouffe, Chantal
2013 Agonistics:
Thinking the world politically. London: Verso
Books.
[Google Scholar]
-
Papacharissi, Zizi
2015 Affective
publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New
York: Oxford University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Pocheptsov, Georgii
[Google Scholar]
-
Pfetsch, Barbara
2014 “The
idea of political communication cultures and its empirical
correlates”. InPolitical communication cultures in
Europe, edited byBarbara Pfetsch. 13–30. Basingstoke,
UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
[Google Scholar]
-
Roth, Andrew
[Google Scholar]
-
Schapals, Aljosha
Karim
2018 “Fake news: Australian and
British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of “alternative facts”.
Journalism
Practice12, no.
8: 976–985.
10.1080/17512786.2018.1511822
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1511822
[Google Scholar]
-
Spaiser, Viktoria, Thomas Chadefaux, Karsten Donnay, Fabian Russmann, & Dirk Helbing
2017 “Communication
power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests.”
Journal of
Information Technology &
Politics14, no.
2: 132–153.
10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288
https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1308288
[Google Scholar]
-
Tandoc, Edson
C., Wei
Lim Zheng, & Richard Ling
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
[Google Scholar]
-
Torfing, Jacob
1999 New
theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and
Zizek. Vol.301. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishers.
[Google Scholar]
-
White, Stephen, & Ian McAllister
2014 “Did
Russia (nearly) have a Facebook revolution in 2011? Social media’s challenge to
authoritarianism.”
Politics34, no.
1: 72–84.
10.1111/1467‑9256.12037
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12037
[Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh