Volume 20, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



While the debate around the prevalence and potential effects of has received considerable scholarly attention, less research has focused on how political elites and pundits weaponized to delegitimize the media. In this study, we examine the rhetoric in 2020 U.S. presidential primary candidates Facebook advertisements. Our analysis suggests that Republican and Democratic candidates alike attack and demean the news media on several themes, including castigating them for malicious gatekeeping, for being out of touch with the views of the public, and for being a bully. Only Trump routinely attacks the news media for trafficking in falsehoods and for colluding with other interests to attack his candidacy. Our findings highlight the ways that candidates instrumentalize the news media for their own rhetorical purposes; further constructing the news media as harmful to democracy.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Emily R.
    2020 “The Narrative That Wasn’t: What Passes for Discourse in the Age of Trump.” Media, Culture & Society42 (2): 225–41. doi:  10.1177/0163443719867302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719867302 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakir, Vian, and Andrew McStay
    2018 “Fake News and The Economy of Emotions.” Digital Journalism6 (2): 154–75. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baym, Geoffrey
    2005 “The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism”. Political Communication, 22 (3), 259–276. doi:  10.1080/10584600591006492
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumler, Jay G., and Stephen Cushion
    2014 “Normative Perspectives on Journalism Studies: Stock-Taking and Future Directions.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism15 (3): 259–72. doi:  10.1177/1464884913498689
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913498689 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bovet, Alexandre, and Hernán A. Makse
    2019 “Influence of Fake News in Twitter during the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Nature Communications10 (1). doi:  10.1038/s41467‑018‑07761‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2 [Google Scholar]
  6. boyd, danah
    2017 “The Information War Has Begun.” January 27, 2017. www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2017/01/27/the-information-war-has-begun.html
  7. Brummette, John, Marcia DiStaso, Michail Vafeiadis, and Marcus Messner
    2018 “Read All About It: The Politicization of ‘Fake News’ on Twitter.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95 (2): 497–517. doi:  10.1177/1077699018769906
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018769906 [Google Scholar]
  8. Egelhofer, Jana Laura, and Sophie Lecheler
    2019 “Fake News as a Two-Dimensional Phenomenon: A Framework and Research Agenda.” Annals of the International Communication Association43 (2): 97–116. doi:  10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782 [Google Scholar]
  9. Farkas, Johan, and Jannick Schou
    2019Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy: Mapping the Politics of Falsehood. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429317347
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317347 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frankfurt, Harry
    2005On Bullshit. Vol.8. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400826537
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826537 [Google Scholar]
  11. Guess, Andrew, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua Tucker
    2019 “Less than You Think: Prevalence and Predictors of Fake News Dissemination on Facebook.” Science Advances5 (1): eaau4586. doi:  10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanitzsch, Thomas, Arjen Van Dalen, and Nina Steindl
    2018 “Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics23 (1): 3–23. doi:  10.1177/1940161217740695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695 [Google Scholar]
  13. Herbst, Susan
    2010Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
    2018Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President What We Don’t, Can’t, and Do Know. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Keener, Kayla
    2019 “Alternative Facts and Fake News: Digital Mediation and The Affective Spread of Hate in the Era of Trump.” Journal of Hate Studies14 (1): 137. doi:  10.33972/jhs.128
    https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.128 [Google Scholar]
  16. Koliska, Michael, Kalyani Chadha, and Alison Burns
    2020 “Talking Back: Journalists Defending Attacks Against Their Profession in the Trump Era.” Journalism Studies21 (11): 1496–1513. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kreiss, Daniel
    2016Prototype Politics: Technology-Intensive Campaigning and the Data of Democracy. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
    2017 “The Hollow Man: Donald Trump, Populism, and Post-Truth Politics.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 595–606. doi:  10.1075/jlp.17022.lak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17022.lak [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Taeku, and Christian Hosam
    2020 “Fake News Is Real: The Significance and Sources of Disbelief in Mainstream Media in Trump’s America.” Sociological Forum35 (S1): 996–1018. doi:  10.1111/socf.12603
    https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12603 [Google Scholar]
  20. Linden, Sander van der, Costas Panagopoulos, and Jon Roozenbeek
    2020 “You Are Fake News: Political Bias in Perceptions of Fake News.” Media, Culture & Society42 (3): 460–70. doi:  10.1177/0163443720906992
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720906992 [Google Scholar]
  21. Meeks, Lindsey
    2020 “Defining the Enemy: How Donald Trump Frames the News Media”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97 (1): 211–234. 10.1177/1077699019857676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676 [Google Scholar]
  22. McNair, Brian
    2017 “Politics, Democracy and The Media.” InAn Introduction to Political Communication. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750293‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750293-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mercieca, Jennifer
    2020Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump. Texas A&M University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mutz, Diana
    2015In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. PRINCETON; OXFORD: Princeton University Press. 10.23943/princeton/9780691165110.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691165110.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
    2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society4 (2): 205630511877601. doi:  10.1177/2056305118776010
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schulz, Anne, Werner Wirth, and Philipp Müller
    2020 “We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions.” Communication Research47 (2): 201–26. doi:  10.1177/0093650218794854
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854 [Google Scholar]
  27. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer
    2019Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. Second Edition. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190694043.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694043.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Lauren Bryant
    2011 “Agenda Control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube Debates.” Communication Quarterly59 (5): 529–46. doi:  10.1080/01463373.2011.614212
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.614212 [Google Scholar]
  29. Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, Brian McKernan, Patricia Rossini, Jeff Hemsley, Sarah E. Bolden, and Ania Korsunska
    2020 “Illuminating 2020 Report: The 2020 General Election Campaign Advertising on Facebook.” Illuminating 2020 (blog). December 4, 2020. https://news.illuminating.ischool.syr.edu/2020/12/04/illuminating-2020-report-the-2020-general-election-campaign-advertising-on-facebook/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamul, Daniel J., Adrienne Holz Ivory, Jessica Hotter, and Jordan Wolf
    2020 “All the President’s Tweets: Effects of Exposure to Trump’s ‘Fake News’ Accusations on Perceptions of Journalists, News Stories, and Issue Evaluation.” Mass Communication and Society23 (3): 301–30. doi:  10.1080/15205436.2019.1652760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1652760 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tandoc, Edson C., Zheng Wei Lim, and Richard Ling
    2018 “Defining ‘Fake News’: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions.” Digital Journalism6 (2): 137–53. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 [Google Scholar]
  32. “Trump Twitter Archive
  33. Tsfati, Yariv, and Jonathan Cohen
    2012 “Perceptions of Media and Media Effects:” InThe International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. American Cancer Society. doi:  10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems995
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems995 [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Duyn, Emily, and Jessica Collier
    2019 “Priming and Fake News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News Media.” Mass Communication and Society22 (1): 29–48. doi:  10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 2020 U.S. election; fake news; social media; Trump
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error