Gender, language, and representation in the United States Senate

References

1. Barnes, Tiffany D. and Mirya R. Holman
   2020 “Gender Quotas, Women’s Representation, and Legislative Diversity.” The Journal of Politics84, no.4: 000–000. 10.1086/708336
   https://doi.org/10.1086/708336 [Google Scholar]
2. Barnett, Micahel
   1990 “High Politics is Low Politics: The Domestic and Systemic Sources of Israeli Security Policy, 1967–1977.” World Politics42, no.4 (1990): 529–62. JSTOR. 10.2307/2010513
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2010513 [Google Scholar]
3. Bell, Courtney M., Philip M. McCarthy, and Danielle S. McNamara
   2012 “Using LIWC and Coh-Metrix to investigate gender differences in linguistic styles.” Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution. 545–56. IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑60960‑741‑8.ch032
   https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8.ch032 [Google Scholar]
4. Bergvall, Victoria L.
   1999 “Toward a comprehensive theory of language and gender.” Language in Society28, no.2 (1999): 273–93. 10.1017/S0047404599002080
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599002080 [Google Scholar]
5. Bernieri, Frank J., & Robert Rosenthal
   1991 “Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony.” Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. 401–32. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blei, David. M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan
   2003 “Latent dirichlet allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 (January): 993–1022.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bligh, Michelle C. and Jeffrey C. Kohles
   2008 “Negotiating gender role expectations: Rhetorical leadership and women in the US senate.” Leadership4, no.4 (November): 381–402. 10.1177/1742715008095187
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008095187 [Google Scholar]
8. Bortfeld, Heather, Silvia D. Leon, Jonathan E. Bloom, Michael F. Schober, and Susan E. Brennan
   2001 “Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender.” Language and Speech, 44, no.2(June 2001): 123–47. 10.1177/00238309010440020101
   https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101 [Google Scholar]
9. Burns, Courtney. and Amanda Murdie
   2018 “Female chief executives and state human rights practices: Self-fulfilling the political double bind.” Journal of Human Rights17, no.4 (April): 470–84. 10.1080/14754835.2018.1460582
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2018.1460582 [Google Scholar]
10. Carroll, Susan J.
    2002 “Partisan Dynamics of the Gender Gap among State Legislators.(Symposium: Trends in State Party Politics).” Spectrum: The Journal of State Government75 (4): 18–23.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Childs, Sarah and Mona Lena Krook
    2006 “Gender and politics: The state of the art.” Politics26, no.1 (January): 18–28. 10.1111/j.1467‑9256.2006.00247.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00247.x [Google Scholar]
12. Clark, Janet, Robert Darcy, Susan Welch, M. Ambrosius, and J. A. Flammang
    1985 “Political Women: Current Roles in State and Local Government.”
13. Cohen, Jacob
    1977 “Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences” (revised ed.). New York: Academic Press.
14. Condon, W. S., and W. D. Ogston
    1966 “Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease143, no.4 (October): 338–47. 10.1097/00005053‑196610000‑00005
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-196610000-00005 [Google Scholar]
15. Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly, and Laura Langbein
    2009 “Linking Women’s Descriptive and Substantive Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender5 (4): 491–518. 10.1017/S1743923X09990328
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990328 [Google Scholar]
16. Detraz, Nicole
    2011 “Threats or Vulnerabilities? Assessing the Link Between Climate Change and Security.” Global Environmental Politics11, no.3 (August): 104–20. 10.1162/GLEP_a_00071
    https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00071 [Google Scholar]
17. Diekman, Amanda B.
    2007 “Negotiating the Double Bind: Interpersonal and Instrumental Evaluations of Dominance.” Sex Roles, 56, no.9 (May): 551–61. 10.1007/s11199‑007‑9198‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9198-0 [Google Scholar]
18. Diermeier, Daniel, Jean François Godbout, Yu Bei, and Stefan Kaufmann, S.
    2012 “Language and Ideology in Congress.” British Journal of Political Science42, no.1 (May): 31–55. 10.1017/S0007123411000160
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000160 [Google Scholar]
19. Dion, Michelle
    2008 “All-knowing or all-nurturing? Student expectations, gender roles, and practical suggestions for women in the classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics41, no.4 (October): 853–56.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dolan, Kathleen
    2005 “Do women candidates play to gender stereotypes? Do men candidates play to women? Candidate sex and issues priorities on campaign websites.” Political Research Quarterly58, no.1 (March): 31–44. 10.1177/106591290505800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800103 [Google Scholar]
21. Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    2013 “Language and gender.” Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139245883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883
22. Files, Julia, Anita P. Mayer, Marica G. Ko, Patricia Friedrich, Marjorie Jenkins, Michael J. Bryan, Suneela Vegunta, Christopher M. Wittich, Melissa A. Lyle, Ryan Melikian, Treveor, Duston, Yu-Hui H., Chang, and Sharonne N. Hayes
    2017 “Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias.” Journal of Women’s Health26, no.5 (February): 413–19. 10.1089/jwh.2016.6044
    https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6044 [Google Scholar]
23. Frederick, Brian
    2009 “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” InCongress & the Presidency36:181–202. 10.1080/07343460902948097
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07343460902948097 [Google Scholar]
24. Gilligan, Carol
    1993 “In a different voice.” Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674037618
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674037618
25. Gilligan, Carol
    1995 “Moral orientation and moral development [1987].” InJustice and care. 31–46. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429499463‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499463-4 [Google Scholar]
26. Heilman, M. E., A. S. Wallen, D. Fuchs, and M. M. Tamkins
    2004 “Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks.” Journal of Applied Psychology89, no.3 (June): 416–27. 10.1037/0021‑9010.89.3.416
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 [Google Scholar]
27. Herrnson, Paul S., J. Celeste Lay, and Atiya Kai Stokes
    2003 “Women running ‘as women’: Candidate gender, campaign issues, and voter-targeting strategies.” The Journal of Politics65, no.1 (February): 244–55. 10.1111/1468‑2508.t01‑1‑00013
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00013 [Google Scholar]
28. Hill, Kim Quaile, and Patricia A. Hurley
    2002 “Symbolic Speeches in the US Senate and Their Representational Implications.” The Journal of Politics64 (1): 219–231. 10.1111/1468‑2508.00125
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00125 [Google Scholar]
29. Holman, Mirya R.
    2014 Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Holman, Mirya R.
    2016 “Gender, political rhetoric, and moral metaphors in state of the city addresses.” Urban Affairs Review52, no.4 (June): 501–30. 10.1177/1078087415589191
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415589191 [Google Scholar]
31. Holmes, Janet
    1997 “Women, language and identity.” Journal of Sociolinguistics1, no.2 (June): 195–223. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00012
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00012 [Google Scholar]
32. Holmes, Janet. and Miriam Meyerhoff
    (eds.) 2003 The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, Oxford. 10.1002/9780470756942
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942 [Google Scholar]
33. Huddy, Leonie and Nayda Terkildsen
    1993 “Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.” American Journal of Political Science37, no.1 (February)119–47. 10.2307/2111526
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526 [Google Scholar]
34. James, Deborah, Sandra Clarke, and Deborah Tannen
    1993 “Gender and conversational interaction.” Women, Men and Interruptions: A Critical Review, edited byDeborah Tannen. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jones, Jennifer J.
    2016 “Talk ‘like a man’: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013.” Perspectives on Politics14, no.3 (September): 625–42. 10.1017/S1537592716001092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001092 [Google Scholar]
36. Kahn, Kim F.
    1993 “Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for U.S. Senate.” Political Research Quarterly46, no.3 (September): 481–502. 10.1177/106591299304600303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600303 [Google Scholar]
37. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph Nye
    1977 Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Knight, Chris
    2008 “Language co-evolved with the rule of law.” Mind & Society7, no.1 (February):109–218. 10.1007/s11299‑007‑0039‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-007-0039-1 [Google Scholar]
39. Lakoff, Robin
    2003 “Language, gender, and politics: Putting ‘women’ and ‘power’ in the same sentence.” The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited byJanet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 160–78. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9780470756942.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch7 [Google Scholar]
40. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2007 “Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis.” Critical Discourse Studies4, no.2 (September): 141–64. 10.1080/17405900701464816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816 [Google Scholar]
41. Levy, Dena, Charles Tien, and Rachelle Aved
    2001 “Do differences matter? Women members of Congress and the Hyde Amendment.” Women & Politics23, no.1 (January): 105–27. 10.1300/J014v23n01_07
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v23n01_07 [Google Scholar]
42. Madera, J. M., M. R. Hebl, and R. C. Martin
    2009 “Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.” The Journal of Applied Psychology94, no.6 (November): 1591–99. 10.1037/a0016539
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016539 [Google Scholar]
43. Maltz, Daneil N., and Ruth A. Borker
    1982 “A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication.” A Cultural Approach to Interpersonal Communication: Essential Readings, edited byLeila Monaghan and Jane Goodman, 168–85. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mansbridge, Jane
    1999 “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–657. 10.2307/2647821
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821 [Google Scholar]
45. McCallum, A. K.
    2002 “Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit.” www.citeulike.org/group/3030/article/1062263
46. McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal
    2016 Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. McDowall, J. J.
    1978 “Interactional synchrony: A reappraisal.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36, no.9 (September): 963–75. 10.1037/0022‑3514.36.9.963
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.963 [Google Scholar]
48. Niederhoffer, K. G., and James W. Pennebaker
    2002 “Linguistic style matching in social interaction.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology21, no.4 (December) 337–60. 10.1177/026192702237953
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953 [Google Scholar]
49. Osborn, Tracy L.
    2012 “How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=KL3UkotYeqgC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=tracy+osborn+2012&ots=FN4-xXLFdi&sig=7_4h8tXMv1c92vSUquXKcFCvzz8. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199845347.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199845347.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
50. Osborn, Tracy and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez
    2010 “Speaking as women: Women and floor speeches in the Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy31, no.1 (February): 1–21. 10.1080/15544770903501384
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384 [Google Scholar]
51. Osborn, Tracy, Rebecca J. Kreitzer, Emily U. Schilling, and Jennifer Hayes Clark
    2019 “Ideology and Polarization among Women State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly44 (4): 647–680. 10.1111/lsq.12243
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12243 [Google Scholar]
52. Pearson, Kathryn and Logan Dancey
    2011a “Elevating women’s voices in Congress: Speech participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly64, no.4 (December): 910–23. 10.1177/1065912910388190
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910388190 [Google Scholar]
53. Pearson, Kathryn and Logan Dancey
    2011b “Speaking for the underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing women’s interests in a partisan era.” Politics & Gender7no.4 (February), 493–519. 10.1017/S1743923X1100033X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1100033X [Google Scholar]
54. Pennebaker, James W.
    2013 The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pennebaker, James W.
    2018 “Expressive Writing in Psychological Science.” Perspectives on Psychological Science13 (2): 226–229. 10.1177/1745691617707315
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707315 [Google Scholar]
56. Pennebaker, James W., Ryan L. Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn
    2015 “The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015.” UT Faculty/Researcher Works. https://utexas-ir.tdl.org/handle/2152/31333
    [Google Scholar]
57. Robson, Deborah C.
    2000 “Stereotypes and the female politician: A case study of Senator Barbara Mikulski.” Communication Quarterly48, no.3 (May): 205–22. 10.1080/01463370009385593
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385593 [Google Scholar]
58. Saint-Germain, Michelle A.
    1989 “Does Their Difference Make a Difference?The Impact of Women on Public Policy in Arizona Legislature.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Sawilowsky, Shlomo S.
    2009 “New effect size rules of thumb.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. digitalcommons.wayne.edu/coe_tbf/4/. 10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
    https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 [Google Scholar]
60. Sheldon, Amy
    1990 “Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes.” Discourse Processes13, no.1: 5–31. 10.1080/01638539009544745
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544745 [Google Scholar]
61. Shor, Boris, and Nolan McCarty
    2011 “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 530–551. 10.1017/S0003055411000153
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000153 [Google Scholar]
62. Sinclair, Barbara
    2018 “Tip O’Neill and Contemporary House Leadership.” InMasters of the House, eds: Roger H. Davidson, Susan Hammond & Raymond Smock, 289–318. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429499029‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499029-11 [Google Scholar]
63. Sunderland, Jane
    2004 Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230505582
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505582 [Google Scholar]
64. Swers, Michael L.
    2001 “Understanding the policy impact of electing women: Evidence from research on congress and state legislatures.” PS: Political Science and Politics34, no.2 (June): 217–20. 10.1017/S1049096501000348
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096501000348 [Google Scholar]
65. Swers, Michele L.
    2002 “Fighting for Women’s Issues on the House Floor: An Analysis of Floor Amending Behavior in the 103d and 104th Congresses.” Legislative Studies Quarterly27:151–151.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Swers, Michael L.
    2013 Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226022963.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226022963.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
67. Thomas, Sue
    1994 How women legislate. Oxford University Press on Demand.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Thomsen, Danielle M.
    2015 “Why so Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the US Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40 (2): 295–323. 10.1111/lsq.12075
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12075 [Google Scholar]
69. Walsh, Katherine Cramer
    2002 “Enlarging Representation: Women Bringing Marginalized Perspectives to Floor Debate in the House of Representatives.” InWomen Transforming Congress, edited byCindy Simon Rosenthal, 370–396. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Waltz, Kenneth N.
    2010 Theory of international politics. Waveland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wodak, Ruth
    2003 “Multiple identities: the role of female parliamentarians in the EU Parliament.” The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited byJanet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 671–98. Blackwell, Oxford. 10.1002/9780470756942.ch29
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch29 [Google Scholar]
72. Youde, Jeremy
    2016 “High politics, low politics, and global health.” Journal of Global Security Studies1, no.2 (May): 157–70. 10.1093/jogss/ogw001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogw001 [Google Scholar]