1887
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates how Brexit was de/legitimised by different Labour actors in a corpus of texts published after the referendum (2016–2020). It thus contributes an perspective to understanding discursive dynamics of European (dis)integration by building on the notorious ‘European question’ historically debated inside Labour and on the polysemy of Brexit constructed by/reflected in such discourses. The analysis, conducted at lexical-semantic and discursive-pragmatic levels, points to distinct strategic, ideological and ambivalent forms of de/legitimation of Brexit in the discourses of Labour. While strategic and ambivalent de/legitimation point to the Brexit debate being mainly driven by political communication logics, ideological de/legitimation highlights a deeper struggle inside Labour over EU-rope, especially in relation to international vs. national conceptualisations of socialism. While EU-rope was de/legitimised (and Brexit legitimised) by advocates of ‘socialism in one country’, reverse stances tended to be adopted by supporters of ‘international socialism’.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21069.zap
2022-02-07
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, Samuel
    2019a “‘Crisis’ as a discursive strategy in Brexit referendum campaigns”. Critical Discourse Studies16(4): 449–464. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1591290
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1591290 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2019b “Standing up for ‘real people’ UKIP, the Brexit, and discursive strategies on Twitter”. InImagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum, edited by Jan Zienkowski , and Ruth Breeze , 230–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.83.10ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.10ben [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton, Matt , and Frederick H. Pitts
    2018Corbynism: A Critical Approach. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/9781787543690
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787543690 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brusenbauch Meislova, Monika
    2019 “Brexit Means Brexit – or Does It? The Legacy of Theresa May’s Discursive Treatment of Brexit.” The Political Quarterly, 90: 681–689. 10.1111/1467‑923X.12767
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12767 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caiani, Manuela , and Simona Guerra
    2017Euroscepticism, democracy and the media: Communicating Europe, contesting Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59643‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59643-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2019Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28768‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Demata, Massimiliano
    2019 “‘The referendum result delivered a clear message’: Jeremy Corbyn’s populist discourse”. In: Discourses of Brexit. Edited by Veronika Koller , Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer , 123–139. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. Diamond, Patrick
    2019 “Brexit and The Labour Party. Euro-caution vs. Euro-fanaticism? The Labour party’s ‘constructive ambiguity’ on Brexit and the European Union.” InThe Routledge handbook of the politics of Brexit, edited by Diamond, P. , Nedergaard, P. , & Rosamond, B. , 167–178. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dieckmann, Walther
    1975Language in Politics. Introduction to the pragmatics and semantics of political language. 2nd editionHeidelberg: Winter
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough
    2012Political Discourse Analysis, A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fontaine, Lise
    2017 “The early semantics of the neologism BREXIT: a lexico-grammatical approach.” Functional Linguistics4 (6). 10.1186/s40554‑017‑0040‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0040-x [Google Scholar]
  12. Freeden, Michael
    2003Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2021 Discourse, concepts, ideologies. Pausing for thought. Journal of Language and Politics, 20 (1): 47–61. 10.1075/jlp.20051.fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20051.fre [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanretty, Chris
    2017 “Areal interpolation and the UK’s referendum on EU membership.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27 (4): 466–483. 10.1080/17457289.2017.1287081
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1287081 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirsh, David
    2017Contemporary Left Antisemitism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315304311
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315304311 [Google Scholar]
  16. Katsambekis, Giorgios , and Alexandros Kioupkiolis
    2019The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180823
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180823 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kilgariff, Adam
    2009 “Simple maths for keywords.” InProceedings of Corpus Linguistics Conference CL2009, edited by Mahlberg, M. , González-Díaz, V. & Smith, C. University of Liverpool, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Koller, Veronika , Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer
    (eds.) 2019Discourses of Brexit. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867 [Google Scholar]
  19. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: a Critical Discourse Analysis, Social Semiotics24 (3): 345–365. 10.1080/10350330.2014.930607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.930607 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maiguashca, Bice , and Jonathan Dean
    2019 Corbynism, Populism and the Re-shaping of Left Politics in Contemporary Britain. In G. Katsambekis and A. Kioupkiolis (Eds.), The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180823‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180823-8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marquand, David
    1991The Progressive Dilemma. London, Heinemann
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, James Robert and Peter Robert Rupert White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  24. Menon, Anand , and Alan Wager
    2019 “Labour’s Brexit Dilemma.” InBrexit and Public Opinion 2019, edited by Anand Menon , 31–33). https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Public-Opinion-2019-report.pdf. Accessed21/02/2021
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Musolff, Andreas
    2017 “Truths, lies and figurative scenarios – Metaphors at the heart of Brexit.” Journal of Language and Politics16(5): 641–657. 10.1075/jlp.16033.mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16033.mus [Google Scholar]
  26. 2019 “Brexit as “having your cake and eating it”: The discourse career of a proverb.” In:.) Discourses of Brexit, edited by Veronika Koller , Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer , 208–221. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-13 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nairn, Tom
    1972 “The European Question”. New Left Review75
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Philo, Greg , Mike Berry , Justin Schlosberg , Antony Lerman , and David W. Miller
    2019Bad News for Labour: Antisemitism, the Party and Public Belief. London: Pluto Press. 10.2307/j.ctvpbnn3r
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpbnn3r [Google Scholar]
  29. Rich, Dave
    2018The Left’s Jewish Problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel and Antisemitism. Biteback publishing
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Serafis, Dimitris , E. Dimitris , and Stavros Assimakopoulos
    2022 “Sailing to Ithaka: The transmutation of Greek left-populism in discourses about the European Union”, Journal of Language and Politics. 10.1075/jlp.21063.ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21063.ser [Google Scholar]
  31. Shaw, Eric
    2021 “The UK and the Labour Party”. InEurope and the Left: Resisting the Populist Tide, edited by James Newell , 189–210. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑54541‑3_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54541-3_9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rayson, Steve
    2020The Fall of the Red Wall: ‘The Labour Party no longer represents people like us’. Independently published
    [Google Scholar]
  33. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1995 “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis” inLanguage & Peace, edited by Schäffner, C. and Wenden, L. , 17–33. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Watts, Jake , and Tim Bale
    2019 “Populism as an intra-party phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(1): 99–115. 10.1177/1369148118806115
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118806115 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 “Politics as Usual: Investigating political discourse in action.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by J. Gee & M. Handford , 525–540. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Worth, Owen
    2017 “Whither Lexit?”, Capital & Class41(2):351–357. 10.1177/0309816817711558c
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816817711558c [Google Scholar]
  37. Zappettini, Franco
    2019a “The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic.” Critical Discourse Studies16 (4): 403–419. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2019b “The official vision for ‘global Britain’: Brexit as rupture and continuity between free trade, liberal internationalism and ‘values’.” Discourses of Brexit, edited by V. Koller , S. Kopf , & M. Milgbauer , 140–154. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-9 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2019cEuropean identities in discourse: a transnational citizens’ perspective. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350043008
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350043008 [Google Scholar]
  40. (forthcoming). Brexit: a Critical Discursive Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2021a “The tabloidization of the Brexit campaign: Power to the (British) people?” Journal of Language and Politics20(2): 277–303. 10.1075/jlp.19103.zap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19103.zap [Google Scholar]
  42. 2021b “The UK as victim and hero in the Sun’s coverage of the Brexit ‘humiliation’ in Media emotionalization” Special issue of theRussian Journal of Linguistics, edited by Zappettini, F. , Larina, T. and Ponton, D. ) 25 (3): 645–662. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑3‑645‑662
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-645-662 [Google Scholar]
  43. Zappettini, Franco and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2021Brexit in media and political discourses: From national populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003166832
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166832 [Google Scholar]
  44. Zappettini, Franco and Marzia Maccaferri
    2021 “Euroscepticism between populism and technocracy: The case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle.” Journal of Contemporary European Research17(2). 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1184
    https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1184 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21069.zap
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.21069.zap
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ambivalence; Brexit; CDA; ideology; Labour; language; socialism; strategy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error