1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Volume 22, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper analyzes the legitimation strategies used by Jerry John Rawlings, a Ghanaian revolutionary leader, to license his revolutionary actions, including political enemy executions and a crackdown on corrupt practices. It adapts and extends van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework by demonstrating how Rawlings exploited historical memory and the notion of sacrifice in conjunction with the strategies of authorization, rationalization and moralization to formulate his revolutionary rhetoric. The analysis reveals that the legitimation strategies enabled Rawlings to project a patriot-cum-nationalist identity as well as construct himself as a noble revolutionary mandated by the people of Ghana to represent their interests, protect them from evildoers and lead the process of social transformation. The study illustrates the persuasive power of revolutionary discourses in terms of how they function ideologically in the message they communicate (or exaggerate) and conceal.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22002.gan
2022-11-01
2024-10-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22002.gan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ali, Marwah, Anne Christopher, and Munif Nordin
    2016 “Language Use and De-legitimation Strategy in Newspaper Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis”. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences10(12): 318–327.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alinejad, Mahmoud
    1999 Imagination, Meaning and Revolution: The Sources of the Revolutionary Power of Islam in Iran. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke
    2006 “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2014 Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke and New York. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiluwa, Innocent
    2015 “Radicalist Discourse: A Study of the Stances of Nigeria’s Boko Haram and Somalia’s Al Shabaab on Twitter”. Journal of Multicultural Discourses10(2): 214–235. 10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1041964 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciaglia, Antonio
    2013 “Politics in the Media and the Media in Politics: A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Media and Political Systems in three European Countries”. European Journal of Communication28(5): 541–555. 10.1177/0267323113494882
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113494882 [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards, John
    2004 “After the Fall”. Discourse & Society15(2–3): 155–184. 10.1177/0957926504041015
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041015 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, Norman
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed.London: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Folson, Kweku
    1993 “Ideology, Revolution and Development – The Years of Jerry John Rawlings”. InGhana under PNDC Ruleedited byEmmanuel Gyimah-Boadi, 74–99. Great Britain: CODESRIA.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman, Elie
    2017 “Evasion Strategies in International Documents: When ‘Constructive Ambiguity’ Leads to Oppositional Interpretation”. Critical Discourse Studies14(4): 385–401. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1292932
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1292932 [Google Scholar]
  11. Geis, Michael
    1987 The Language of Politics. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4714‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4714-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham, Phil, Thomas Keenan, and Anne-Maree Dowd
    2004 “A Call to Arms at the End of History: A Discourse-historical Analysis of George W. Bush’s Declaration of War on Terror”. Discourse & Society15(2–3): 199–221. 10.1177/0957926504041017
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041017 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hodges, Adam
    (ed.) 2013 Discourses of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Igwebuike, Ebuka and Lily Chimuanya
    2021 “Legitimating Falsehood in Social Media: A Discourse Analysis of Political Fake News”. Discourse & Communication15(1): 42–58. 10.1177/1750481320961659
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961659 [Google Scholar]
  15. Igwebuike, Ebuka and Ameh Akoh
    2021 “Self-legitimation and Other-delegitimation in the Internet Radio Speeches of the Supreme Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra”. Critical Discourse Studies1–19. 10.1080/17405904.2021.1921817
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1921817 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Nam
    2018 “Revolutionary Leaders and Mass Killing”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(2): 289–317. 10.1177/0022002716653658
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716653658 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lazar, Annita and Michelle Lazar
    2004 “The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the Double Face of Threat”. Discourse & Society15(2–3): 223–242. 10.1177/0957926504041018
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041018 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lizardo, Omar
    2012 “The Conceptual Bases of Metaphors of Dirt and Cleanliness in Moral and Non-moral Reasoning”. Cognitive Linguistics23(2): 367–393. 10.1515/cog‑2012‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Maurantonio, Nichole
    2014 “The Politics of Memory. InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited byKate Kenski and Kathleen Jamieson, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2020 Populism. Cambridge: Polity.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Nartey, Mark
    2019 “‘I shall prosecute a ruthless war on these monsters … A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Discourse of Resistance in the Rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah’”. Critical Discourse Studies16(2): 113–130. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1535987
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1535987 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2020 “Voice, Agency and Identity: A Positive Discourse Analysis of ‘Resistance’ in the Rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah”. Language & Intercultural Communication20(2): 193–205. 10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nartey, Mark. & Ernanda
    2020 “Formulating Emancipatory Discourses and Reconstructing Resistance: A Positive Discourse Analysis of Sukarno’s Speech at the First Afro-Asian Conference”. Critical Discourse Studies17(1): 22–38. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1617758
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617758 [Google Scholar]
  24. Oddo, John
    2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses”. Discourse & Communication22(3): 287–314.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions”. Discourse & Society22(6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rojo, Luisa and Teun van Dijk, T.
    1997 “There was a problem, and it was solved!”’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse & Society8(4): 523–566. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Semelin, Jacques
    2013 Purify and Destroy: The Political Uses of Massacre and Genocide. New York, NY: Columbia University Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Shillington, Kevin
    1992 Ghana and the Rawlings Factor. London: Macmillan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Stedman, Stephen
    1991 Peacemaking in civil war: International mediation in Zimbabwe, 1974–1980. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Tajfel, Henri and John Turner
    1979 “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. InThe Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited byWilliam Austin and Stephen Worchel, 33–37. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Valentino, Benjamin
    2004 Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the 20th Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–83. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  33. 1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication1(1): 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Leeuwen, Theo and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse- historical Analysis”. Discourse Studies1(1): 83–118. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Walt, Stephen
    1992 “Revolution and War”. World Politics44(3): 321–68. 10.2307/2010542
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2010542 [Google Scholar]
  38. Weitz, Eric
    2003 A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse-historical Approach”. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 2011 The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Yankah, Kojo
    2018 The Trial of J.J. Rawlings: Echoes of the 31st December Revolution. Odenton: Habari Afrika Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22002.gan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): African politics; critical discourse studies; Jerry John Rawlings; legitimation strategies; political discourse analysis; revolutionary discourses

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error