How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse

References

1. Agne, Robert R., and Karen Tracy
   2001 “‘Bible Babble’: Naming the interactional trouble at Waco.” Discourse Studies, : –. 10.1177/1461445601003003002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003003002 [Google Scholar]
2. Ajiboye, Esther
   2020 “Polarisation and the Sustenance of Biafra Secessionist Discourses Online.” Journal of Asian and African Studies(): –. 10.1177/0021909619883403
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619883403 [Google Scholar]
3. Ajiboye, Esther, and Taiwo Abioye
   2019 “When citizens talk: Stance and representation in online discourse on Biafra agitations.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926518816197
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518816197 [Google Scholar]
4. Antaki, Charles, Elisenda Ardévol, Francesca Núñez, F., and Agnès Vayreda
   2005 “’For she who knows who she is:’ Managing Accountability in Online Forum Messages.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.tb00306.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x [Google Scholar]
5. Bahaa-eddin, A. Hassan
   2019 “Impolite viewer responses in Arabic political TV talk shows on YouTube.” Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/prag.18025.has
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18025.has [Google Scholar]
6. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1979 Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1981 The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benwell, Bethan
   2012 “Common-sense anti-racism in book group talk: The role of reported speech.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926512441106
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441106 [Google Scholar]
9. Berrocal, Martina
   2019 “Constructing threat through quotes and historical analogies in the Czech and the US ‘Ukraine Discourse’.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.18002.ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18002.ber [Google Scholar]
10. boyd, danah, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan
    2010, January. “Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter.” InSystem sciences (hicss), 2010 43rd hawaii international conference on (pp.–). IEEE. 10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
    https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412 [Google Scholar]
11. Breen, KeithLaw and agonistic politics
    2016 “Agonism, antagonism and the necessity of care.” InLaw and agonistic politics (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bruns, Axel, and Tim Highfield
    2015 “Is Habermas on Twitter?: Social media and the public sphere.” InThe Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315716299‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-5 [Google Scholar]
13. Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Ingrid Van Alphen
    (eds) 2012 Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (Vol.). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/celcr.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15 [Google Scholar]
14. Butler, Carly W., Susan Danby, and Michael Emmison
    2011 “Address terms in turn beginnings: Managing disalignment and disaffiliation in telephone counseling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2011.619311
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.619311 [Google Scholar]
15. Buttny, Richard
    1998 “Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_3 [Google Scholar]
16. Chadwick, Andrew, and Cristian Vaccari
    2019 “News sharing on UK social media: Misinformation, disinformation, and correction.”
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chun, Elaine W.
    2004 “Ideologies of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s revoicings of Mock Asian.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Clift, Rebecca
    2006 “Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential.” Journal of Sociolinguistics(): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00296.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x [Google Scholar]
19. Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as demonstrations.” Linguistic Society of America(): –. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
20. Craig, Robert T.
    2012 “Legitimizing participation in dialogue.” (Re) presentations and Dialogue: . 10.1075/ds.16.07cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.16.07cra [Google Scholar]
21. Dahlberg, Lincoln
    2007 “The Internet and discursive exclusion: From deliberative to agonistic public sphere theory.” InRadical democracy and the Internet (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan, London. 10.1057/9780230592469_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592469_8 [Google Scholar]
22. Davidson, Donald
    1979 “Quotation.” Theory and decision(): –. 10.1007/BF00126690
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126690 [Google Scholar]
23. Demasi, Mirko A.
    2019 “Facts as social action in political debates about the European Union.” Political Psychology(): –. 10.1111/pops.12496
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12496 [Google Scholar]
24. Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
    2019 “‘Hitlahamut’: A term for unreasonable populist public talk in Israel.” Discourse and Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926518816193
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518816193 [Google Scholar]
25. Dori-Hacohen, Gonen, and Nimrod Shavit
    2013 “The cultural meanings of Israeli Tokbek (talk – back online commenting) and their relevance to the online democratic public sphere.” International Journal of Electronic Governance(): –. 10.1504/IJEG.2013.060649
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2013.060649 [Google Scholar]
26. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The stance triangle.” InRichard Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
27. Ehrlich, Susan, and Tanya Romaniuk
    2014 “Discourse analysis.” InR. J. Podesva and D. Sharma (Eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.024 [Google Scholar]
28. Fetzer, Anita, and Elisabeth Reber
    2015 “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, pp.–. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110427561‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-006 [Google Scholar]
29. Foucault, Michel
    1980 “Truth and Power.” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 New York: Vintage Books, –.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Fox, Barbara A., and Jessica Robles
    2010 “It’s like mmm: Enactments with it’s like.” Discourse Studies, no.: –. 10.1177/1461445610381862
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610381862 [Google Scholar]
31. Gabsi, Z.
    (2024) The power of language: Socio-political fracture in Tunisia’s post-Arab Spring revolution. Journal of Language and Politics. 10.1075/jlp.23092.gab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23092.gab [Google Scholar]
32. Garber, Marjorie
    1999 “”(Quotation Marks). Critical Inquiry(): –. 10.1086/448941
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448941 [Google Scholar]
33. Gibson, Will, and Carles Roca-Cuberes
    2019 “Constructing blame for school exclusion in an online comments forum: Membership categorisation analysis and endogenous category work.” Discourse, Context and Media: 100331. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100331
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100331 [Google Scholar]
34. Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S.
    (2022) Social media and political agenda setting. Political communication, (), –. 10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390 [Google Scholar]
35. Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed
    2015 “Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’.” Discourse, Context and Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002 [Google Scholar]
36. Goffman, Erving
    1979 “Footing.” Semiotica(): –. 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
37. Goffman, Erving
    1959 “The presentation of self in everyday life.” Garden City, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Goodwin, Charles
    2006 “Retrospective and prospective orientation in the construction of argumentative moves.” Text and Talk(): –. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.018 [Google Scholar]
39. Goodwin, Charles
    2007 “Interactive footing.” InHolt, E. and Clift, R. (Eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gruber, Helmut
    2017 “Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context and Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.005 [Google Scholar]
41. Günthner, Susanne
    1999 “Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
42. Hall, StuartFormations of Modernity
    1992 “The West and the Rest: Power and Discourse.” Formations of Modernity. Ed.Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben. Cambridge: Polity Press/The Open University, –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hannan, Jason
    2018 “Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics.” European Journal of Communication(): –. 10.1177/0267323118760323
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760323 [Google Scholar]
44. Harré, Rom, and Slocum, Nikki
    2003 “Disputes as complex social events: On the uses of positioning theory.” Common Knowledge(): –. 10.1215/0961754X‑9‑1‑100
    https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-9-1-100 [Google Scholar]
45. Harry, Joseph C.
    2014 “Journalistic quotation: Reported speech in newspapers from a semiotic-linguistic perspective.” Journalism(): –. 10.1177/1464884913504258
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913504258 [Google Scholar]
46. Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore
    2018 “Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445617734936
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734936 [Google Scholar]
47. Herzfeld, Michael
    2001 “Irony and power: toward a politics of mockery in Greece.” InJ. Hernandez and M. T. Huber (Eds.), Irony in action: Anthropology, practice and the moral imagination (pp.–). University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Housley, Willaim, Helena Webb, Adam Edwards, Rob Procter, and Marina Jirotka
    2017 “Membership categorisation and antagonistic Twitter formulations.” Discourse and Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481317726932
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317726932 [Google Scholar]
49. Igwebuike, Ebuka Elias and Lily Chimuanya
    2024 “Self-promotion, ideology and power in the social media posts of Nigerian Female Political Leaders.” Journal of Language and Politics, (), –. 10.1075/jlp.22148.igw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22148.igw [Google Scholar]
50. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. OUPUSA. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
51. Joyce, Jack B.
    2019 “The sequential and moral (dis) order of public disputes: How speakers resist, partition and do being reasonable in talk-in-interaction.” PhD diss., Loughborough University.
52. Jones, Graham M., and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    2009 “Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be+ like in Instant Messaging.” Language and Communication(): –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.09.003 [Google Scholar]
53. Kaiser, Jonas, and Cornelius Puschmann
    2017 “Alliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication.” Communication and the Public(): –. 10.1177/2057047317732350
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317732350 [Google Scholar]
54. Keel, Sara, and Lorenza Mondada
    2017 “The micro-politics of sequential organization: Contributions from conversation analysis and ethnomethodology.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.01kee [Google Scholar]
55. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “The ‘Tweet politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics (), –. 10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
56. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
    2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz [Google Scholar]
57. Kubin, Emily, & Christian Von Sikorski
    2021 “The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review.” Annals of the International Communication Association, (), –. 10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070 [Google Scholar]
58. Lederman, S.
    (2014) Agonism and deliberation in Arendt. Constellations, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑8675.12096
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12096 [Google Scholar]
59. Lee, Siu-yau
    2016 “Surviving online censorship in China: Three satirical tactics and their impact.” The China Quarterly: –. 10.1017/S0305741016001454
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741016001454 [Google Scholar]
60. Lerner, Gene H.
    1994 “Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology(): –. 10.1177/0261927X94131002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94131002 [Google Scholar]
61. Lysaker, Odin
    2021 “Bodily felt integrity: the anarchic core of communication in Jürgen Habermas’s democratic thought.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, (), –. 10.1080/1600910X.2021.2014629
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2021.2014629 [Google Scholar]
62. McCulloch, Gretchen
    2019 Because Internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Riverhead Books.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Meredith, Joanne
    2016 “Using discourse and conversation analysis to analyse online data.” InD. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative Research (4th ed) (pp.–). London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Meredith, Joanne, and Emma Richardson
    2019 “The use of the political categories of Brexiter and Remainer in online comments about the EU referendum.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology(): –. 10.1002/casp.2384
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2384 [Google Scholar]
65. Ming, Liu, and Guofeng Wang
    2022 “An introduction to the special issue on ‘Language, Politics and Media: The Hong Kong protests’”. Journal of Language and Politics, (), –. 10.1075/jlp.21056.liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21056.liu [Google Scholar]
66. Nahon, Karine
    2015 “Where there is social media there is politics.” InThe Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315716299‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-4 [Google Scholar]
67. Paulson, Susan, Lisa L. Gezon, and Michael Watts
    2003 “Locating the political in political ecology: an introduction.” Human Organization: –. 10.17730/humo.62.3.e5xcjnd6y8v09n6b
    https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.3.e5xcjnd6y8v09n6b [Google Scholar]
68. Pomerantz, Anita
    1986 “Extreme-Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies: –. 10.1007/BF00148128
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
69. Rathje, Steve, Jay Van Bavel and Sander Van Der Linden
    2021 “Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (), e2024292118. 10.1073/pnas.2024292118
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024292118 [Google Scholar]
70. Robles, Jessica
    2017 “Misunderstanding as a resource in interaction.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Robles, Jessica S., and Theresa Castor
    2019 “Taking the moral high ground: Practices for being uncompromisingly principled.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.015 [Google Scholar]
72. Sandel, Todd L., Chuyue Ou, Dorji Wangchuk, Bei Ju, and Miguel Duque
    2018 “Unpacking and describing interaction on Chinese WeChat: A methodological approach.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.011 [Google Scholar]
73. Sedlmayr, Gerold
    2018 “Stuart Hall and Power.” Coils of the Serpent: –.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Shaffer, Barbara
    2012 “Reported speech as an evidentiality strategy in American Sign Language.” Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, –. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.011 [Google Scholar]
75. Shibata, Masaki
    2020 “Why do politicians cite others in political debates? A functional analysis of reported speech in a Japanese political debate.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.19061.shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19061.shi [Google Scholar]
76. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2019 “Individual moral otherness as a means to underscore sectoral otherness.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.19012.shu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19012.shu [Google Scholar]
77. Starbird, Kate, Ahmer Arif, and Tom Wilson
    2019 “Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, (CSCW), –. 10.1145/3359229
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3359229 [Google Scholar]
78. Stivers, Tanya
    2008 “Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation.” Research on language and social interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351810701691123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
79. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 “Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.” Discourse studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
80. Svensson, Marina
    2016 “Connectivity, engagement, and witnessing on China’s Weibo.” In TheInternet, social media, and a changing China, pp.–. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Unuabonah, Foluke O.
    2018 “Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings.” Text and Talk(): –. 10.1515/text‑2018‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0012 [Google Scholar]
82. Wodak, Ruth
    2023 “Politics as usual: Investigating political discourse in action.” InM. Handford, and J. P. Gee (Eds.). (pp.–). The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003035244‑49
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-49 [Google Scholar]
83. Xiong, Bingjuan
    2015 “China’s Story Well?: Cultural Framing and Online Contestation.” International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems and Technologies (IJICST), (), –. 10.4018/IJICST.2015010103
    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICST.2015010103 [Google Scholar]
84. Xiong, Bingjuan
    2019 “Communicating citizenship in China’s digital society.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication(): –. 10.1080/17513057.2019.1582791
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1582791 [Google Scholar]
85. Xiong, Bingjuan and Jessica Robles
    2023 “Functions of quotation in online political comments.” Discourse, Context & Media, . 10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100717
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100717 [Google Scholar]
86. Zappavigna, Michele
    2018 Searchable talk: Hashtags and social media metadiscourse. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Zappavigna, Michele
    2022 “Social media quotation practices and ambient affiliation: Weaponising ironic quotation for humorous ridicule in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.003 [Google Scholar]
88. Zhao, Sumin, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2014 “Understanding Semiotic Technology in University Classrooms: A Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint-Assisted Cultural Studies Lectures.” Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463014.2013.859848
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.859848 [Google Scholar]
89. Zheng, Jennifer, and Joseph P. Zompetti
    2023 “I’m not a virus’: Asian hate in Donald Trump’s rhetoric.” Asian Journal of Communication (), –. 10.1080/01292986.2023.2246509
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2246509 [Google Scholar]