Critical junctures beyond the black box

References

1. ’t Hart, Paul, and Karen Tindall
   2009 Framing the Global Economic Downturn, Canberra: Australian National University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abbott, Andrew
   2001 Time Matters: On Theory and Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson
   2012 Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, New York: Crown Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Basta, Karlo
   2017 “The Social Construction of Transformative Political Events.” Comparative Political Studies, 51(10): 1243–1278. 10.1177/0010414017740601
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017740601 [Google Scholar]
5. Bennett, Samuel
   2019 ‘Crisis’ as a Discursive Strategy in Brexit Referendum Campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4): 449–64. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1591290
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1591290 [Google Scholar]
6. Bernhard, Michael
   2015 “Chronic Instability and the Limits of Path Dependence.” Perspectives on Politics, 13(4): 976–91. 10.1017/S1537592715002261
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592715002261 [Google Scholar]
7. Blyth, Mark
   2003 “Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas, and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics, 1(4): 695–706. 10.1017/S1537592703000471
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000471 [Google Scholar]
8. Capoccia, Giovanni
   2015 Critical Junctures and Institutional Change. InAdvances in Comparative Historical Analysis, edited byJames Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen: 147–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316273104.007
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316273104.007 [Google Scholar]
9. Capoccia, Giovanni, and Daniel Kelemen
   2007 “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics, 59 (3): 341–69. 10.1017/S0043887100020852
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852 [Google Scholar]
10. Clemens, Elisabeth
    1993 “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of US Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology, 98(4): 755–98. 10.1086/230089
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230089 [Google Scholar]
11. Clemens, Elisabeth
    2015 “Organizing Powers in Eventful Times.” Social Science History, 39(1): 1–24. 10.1017/ssh.2015.39
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2015.39 [Google Scholar]
12. Collier, Ruth, and David Collier
    1991 Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De Giorgi, Elisabetta, and Gabriella Ilonszki
    (eds.) 2018 Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Conflict Or Consensus?, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315561011
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561011 [Google Scholar]
14. De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Mohd Don
    2013 Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/dapsac.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.52 [Google Scholar]
15. Della Porta, Donatella; Gattinara, Pietro Castelli; Eleftheriadis, Konstantinos and Andrea Felicetti
    2020 Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures: Debating Citizenship after the Charlie Hebdo Attacks, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097431.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Dewan, Torun, and Arthur Spirling
    2011 “Strategic Opposition and Government Cohesion in Westminster Democracies.” American Political Science Review, 105(2): 337–58. 10.1017/S0003055411000050
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000050 [Google Scholar]
17. Ewing, Blake
    2021 “Conceptual History, Contingency and the Ideological Politics of Time.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 26(3): 262–77. 10.1080/13569317.2020.1855766
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1855766 [Google Scholar]
18. Freeden, Michael
    1996 Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Freeden, Michael
    2009 Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400826353
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400826353 [Google Scholar]
20. Goet, Niels
    2019 “Measuring Polarization with Text Analysis: Evidence from the UK House of Commons, 1811–2015.” Political Analysis, 27(4): 1–22. 10.1017/pan.2019.2
    https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.2 [Google Scholar]
21. Hay, Colin
    1996 “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’.” Sociology, 30(2): 253–77. 10.1177/0038038596030002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030002004 [Google Scholar]
22. Hay, Colin
    1999 “Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 1(3): 317–44. 10.1111/1467‑856X.00018
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00018 [Google Scholar]
23. Hix, Simon, and Abdul Noury
    2016 “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? the Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” Political Science Research and Methods, 4(2): 249–73. 10.1017/psrm.2015.9
    https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.9 [Google Scholar]
24. Hogan, John
    2019 “The Critical Juncture Concept’s Evolving Capacity to Explain Policy Change.” European Policy Analysis, 5(2): 170–89. 10.1002/epa2.1057
    https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1057 [Google Scholar]
25. Hunt, Lynn
    1984 Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kalyvas, Stathis
    1996 The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501731419
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501731419 [Google Scholar]
27. Katznelson, Ira
    2003 Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action in Comparative Historical Social Science. InComparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited byJames Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, D1: 270–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803963.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.009 [Google Scholar]
28. Keeler, John
    1993 “Opening the Window for Reform – Mandates, Crises, and Extraordinary Policy-Making.” Comparative Political Studies, 25(4): 433–86. 10.1177/0010414093025004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093025004002 [Google Scholar]
29. Koselleck, Reinhart
    1988 Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Koselleck, Reinhart
    2004 [1985] Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Koselleck, Reinhart, and Richter, Michaela
    2006 Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67(2): 357–400. 10.1353/jhi.2006.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2006.0013 [Google Scholar]
32. Krawatzek, Félix
    2018 Youth in Regime Crisis: Comparative Perspectives from Russia to Weimar Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198826842.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826842.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
33. Krzyżanowska, Natalia, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2018 “‘Crisis’ and Migration in Poland: Discursive Shifts, Anti-Pluralism and the Politicisation of Exclusion.” Sociology, 52(3): 612–18. 10.1177/0038038518757952
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518757952 [Google Scholar]
34. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 “Brexit and the Imaginary of ‘crisis’: A Ciscourse-Conceptual Analysis of European News Media.” Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4): 465–90. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
35. Mahoney, James
    2000 “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society, 29(4): 507–48. 10.1023/A:1007113830879
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879 [Google Scholar]
36. Mahoney, James
    2001 The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mann, Michael
    1986 The Sources of Social Power. Vol. I A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Matthijs, Matthias
    2012 Ideas and Economic Crises in Britain from Attlee to Blair (1945–2005), Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203842744
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842744 [Google Scholar]
39. McAdam, Doug, and William Sewell
    2001 It’s about Time: Temporality in the Study of Social Movements and Revolutions. Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics, 891, p.125. 10.1017/CBO9780511815331.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815331.005 [Google Scholar]
40. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2015 “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition, 50(2): 189–217. 10.1017/gov.2014.13
    https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.13 [Google Scholar]
41. Parnell, Tamsin
    2021 “Humiliating and Dividing the Nation in the British Pro-brexit Press: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies: 1–17. 10.1080/17405904.2021.1983446
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1983446 [Google Scholar]
42. Pierson, Paul
    2004 Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400841080
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841080 [Google Scholar]
43. Riker, William
    1986 The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Roitman, Janet
    2014 Anti-Crisis, Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ruzza, Carlo, and Milica Pejovic
    2019 “Populism at Work: The Language of the Brexiteers and the European Union.” Critical Discourse Studies16(4): 432–48. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1605300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1605300 [Google Scholar]
46. Saward, Michael
    2017 “Agency, Design and ‘Slow Democracy’.” Time & Society, 26(3): 362–83. 10.1177/0961463X15584254
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15584254 [Google Scholar]
47. Schmidt, Vivien
    2008 “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1): 303–26. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342 [Google Scholar]
48. Schwarz, Daniel; Traber, Denise, and Benoit, Kenneth
    2015 “Estimating Intra-Party Preferences: Comparing Speeches to Votes.” Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2): 379–96. 10.1017/psrm.2015.77
    https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.77 [Google Scholar]
49. Sewell, William
    1996 Three Temporalities: Toward en Eventful Sociology. In: McDonald, T. (ed.) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 245–80.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Slater, Dan, and Erica Simmons
    2010 “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies, 43(7): 886–917. 10.1177/0010414010361343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010361343 [Google Scholar]
51. Turner, John D.
    2014 Banking in Crisis: The Rise and Fall of British Banking Stability, 1800 to the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139380874
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139380874 [Google Scholar]
52. Weingast, Barry
    2005 Persuasion, Preference Change, and Critical Junctures: The Microfoundations of a Macroscopic Concept. In: Katznelson, I. & Weingast, B. (eds.) Preferences and situations:161–84. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Yashar, Deborah
    1994 Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zahariadis, Nikolaos
    2003 Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies, Washington, DC: Georgetown university press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Zappettini, Franco, and Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media & Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis. Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]