The construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily

References

1. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
   2008 “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse & society19(3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
2. Bhatia, Aditi, and Andrew S. Ross
   2022 “’We shall not flag or fail, we shall go on to the end” Hashtag activism in Hong Kong protests.” Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 117–142. 10.1075/jlp.21020.bha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21020.bha [Google Scholar]
3. Cao, Xiuling, Danqi Zhang, and Qianjun Luo
   2022 “Attitudinal stance towards the anti-extradition bill movement in China Daily and South China Morning Post: A corpus-assisted comparative analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 60–80. 10.1075/jlp.21021.cao
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21021.cao [Google Scholar]
4. Chan, Chi K.
   2014 “China as ‘other’: Resistance to and ambivalence toward national identity in Hong Kong”. China Perspectives 2014(1): 25–34.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chou, Kwok P.
   2014 “State, market forces and building national identity in China’s Hong Kong and Macao”. InMacao: The Formation of a Global City, edited byC. X. George Wei, 186–207. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, David J.
   1989 “A high degree of autonomy under the Basic Law: An analysis.” InHong Kong: The challenge of transformation, edited byKathleen Cheek-Milby, and Mushkat Miron, 153–188. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cooney, Sean
   1997 “Why Taiwan is not Hong Kong: a review of the PRC’s one country, two systems model for reunification with Taiwan.” Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J.6(3): 497–548.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Davis, Michael C.
   2005 “The basic law and democratisation in Hong Kong.” Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L. Rev. 3(2): 165–185.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davis, Michael C.
   2015 “The Basic Law, universal suffrage and the rule of law in Hong Kong.” Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 38(2): 275–298.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 “Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis.” Linguistics and education41: 269–93. 10.1016/0898‑5898(92)90004‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Norman
    2013 Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
12. Fong, Brian C. H.
    2017 “One country, two nationalisms: Center-periphery relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong, 1997–2016.” Modern China43(5): 523–556. 10.1177/0097700417691470
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700417691470 [Google Scholar]
13. Fu, Hualing, Carole J. Peterson, and Simon N. M. Young
    (eds) 2005 National security and fundamental freedoms: Hong Kong’s Article 23 under scrutiny. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garden, Rose
    2020 “Remarks by President Trump on Actions Against China.” White House Press Release. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-actions-china/ (accessed22 April 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ghai, Yash
    1997 Hong Kong’s new constitutional order: the resumption of Chinese sovereignty and the Basic Law (Vol. 2). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hartig, Falk
    2018 “China Daily: Beijing’s Global Voice?” InChina’s Media Go Global, edited byDaya K. Thussu, Hugo de Burgh, and Anbin Shi, 122–140. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. He, Yinan
    2018 “Domestic troubles, national identity discourse, and China’s attitude towards the West, 2003–2012.” Nations and nationalism24(3): 741–766. 10.1111/nana.12380
    https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12380 [Google Scholar]
18. Henders, Susan
    2010 Territoriality, Asymmetry, and Autonomy: Catalonia, Corsica, Hong Kong, and Tibet. London: Springer. 10.1057/9780230105829
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105829 [Google Scholar]
19. Ho, Janet, and Ming M. Chiu
    2022 “Media portrayals of the Hong Kong Occupy Central Movement’s social actors: Multilevel and critical discourse analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 81–116. 10.1075/jlp.20030.ho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20030.ho [Google Scholar]
20. Information Office of the State Council
    Information Office of the State Council 2014 The practice of the ‘one country, two Systems’ policy in the Hong Kong special administrative region. english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2014/08/23/content_281474982986578.htm#:~:text=The%20Practice%20of%20the%20’One,Hong%20Kong%20Special%20Administrative%20Region&text=%E2%80%9COne%20country%2C%20two%20systems%E2%80%9D%20is%20a%20basic%20state%20policy,peaceful%20reunification%20of%20the%20country, accessed13 December 2021 (accessed22 April 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jones, Rodney H., and Dennis Chau
    2022 “Metalinguistic tactics in the Hong Kong protest movement.” Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 143–172. 10.1075/jlp.21017.jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21017.jon [Google Scholar]
22. Kaeding, Malte P.
    2017 “The rise of ‘localism’ in Hong Kong.” Journal of Democracy28(1): 157–171. 10.1353/jod.2017.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0013 [Google Scholar]
23. Kennedy, Graeme
    2014 An introduction to corpus linguistics. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315843674
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315843674 [Google Scholar]
24. Ku, Agnes S.
    2020 “New forms of youth activism – Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill movement in the local-national-global nexus.” Space and polity24(1): 111–117. 10.1080/13562576.2020.1732201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1732201 [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, Francis L. F.
    2020 “Solidarity in the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong.” Critical Asian Studies52(1): 18–32. 10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629 [Google Scholar]
26. Lee, Francis. L. F., Gary K. Y. Tang, Samson Yuen, and Edmund W. Cheng
    2020 “Five Demands and (Not Quite) Beyond: Claim Making and Ideology in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill Movement.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies53(4): 22–40. 10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.22
    https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.22 [Google Scholar]
27. Li, Joseph
    2011 “HK is ‘a remarkable achievement’”. China Daily, 21 November 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Ming, and Jingxue Ma
    2022 “The politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations: A corpus-assisted discourse study.” Journal of Language and Politics. 21(1): 37–59. 10.1075/jlp.21019.liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21019.liu [Google Scholar]
29. Liu, Ming, and Ling Lin
    2021 “‘One country, two systems’: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the politics of recontextualisation in British, American and Chinese newspapers”. Critical Arts35(3): 17–34. 10.1080/02560046.2021.1985156
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2021.1985156 [Google Scholar]
30. Mark, Chi-Kwan
    2017 “To ‘educate’ Deng Xiaoping in capitalism: Thatcher’s visit to China and the future of Hong Kong in 1982.” Cold War History17(2): 161–180. 10.1080/14682745.2015.1094058
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2015.1094058 [Google Scholar]
31. McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson
    2001 Corpus linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ortmann, Stephan
    2015 “The umbrella movement and Hong Kong’s protracted democratisation process.” Asian Affairs46(1): 32–50. 10.1080/03068374.2014.994957
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2014.994957 [Google Scholar]
33. Rezvani, David A.
    2012 “Dead autonomy, a thousand cuts or partial independence? The autonomous status of Hong Kong.” Journal of Contemporary Asia42(1): 93–122. 10.1080/00472336.2012.634645
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.634645 [Google Scholar]
34. Sansani, Inbal
    2003 “The threat of Article 23 to civil liberties under the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.” Human Rights Brief10(3): 28–31.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Scott, Ian
    2017 ““One country, two systems”: the end of a legitimating ideology?.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration39(2): 83–99. 10.1080/23276665.2017.1325619
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2017.1325619 [Google Scholar]
36. So, Alvin Y.
    2011 “‘One country, two systems’ and Hong Kong-China national integration: A crisis-transformation perspective”. Journal of Contemporary Asia41(1): 99–116. 10.1080/00472336.2011.530039
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2011.530039 [Google Scholar]
37. Tarrow, Sidney
    1989 Democracy and disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tyler, Tom R.
    2005 “Introduction: Legitimating ideologies.” Social Justice Research18(3): 211–215. 10.1007/s11211‑005‑6822‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6822-4 [Google Scholar]
39. van Leeuwen, Theo
    1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” InTexts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byCamermen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wang, Guofeng
    2022 “Britain as a protector, a mediator or an onlooker? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests in British newspapers.” Journal of Language and Politics21(1): 17–36. 10.1075/jlp.21018.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21018.wan [Google Scholar]
41. Wang, Zheng
    2008 “National humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory: Patriotic education campaign in China.” International Studies Quarterly52(4): 783–806. 10.1111/j.1468‑2478.2008.00526.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00526.x [Google Scholar]
42. Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala
    2015 “European identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical approach.” Journal of language and politics14(1): 87–109. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod [Google Scholar]
43. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wodak, Ruth
    2009 The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Xiao, Weiyun
    2001 One country, two systems: An account of the drafting of the Hong Kong Basic Law. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Yin, Liangen, and Haiyan Wang
    2010 “people-centred myth: Representation of the Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily”. Discourse & Communication4(4): 383–98. 10.1177/1750481310381581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310381581 [Google Scholar]
47. Yin, Lo P.
    2014 The Judicial Construction of Hong Kong’s Basic Law: Courts, Politics and Society After 1997. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv4cbj41
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv4cbj41 [Google Scholar]
48. Yuen, Samson
    2015 “Hong Kong After the Umbrella Movement. An uncertain future for” One Country Two Systems”. China Perspective 2015(1): 49–53. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.6656
    https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6656 [Google Scholar]