1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Using Systemic Functional Grammar and conceptual framework in the argumentation-oriented approach to discourse, this study analyzes Chinese central government’s “ Report on the Work of the Government” in 2020 (henceforth the Report) to explore the “interpersonal-function topoi” in the political discourse. The Report was delivered and issued against the backdrop of the surging covid-19 epidemic. This study first calculated the frequency of mood, modality and persons in the Report. The statistics were qualitatively analyzed in relation to various topoi-imagery of the crisis vis-à-vis representing the agency-reflected in the interpersonal metafunction of the language in the Report. These topoi play a vital role in winning popular support for the Chinese central government’s anti-epidemic measures and mobilizing the widest public into actions against the covid-19 pandemic. The analysis demonstrates how the analysis of interpersonal metafunction from an argumentation-oriented perspective can shed light on dealing with crisis discourse, especially in the pandemic settings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22022.wan
2022-11-08
2024-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alizadeh, Afrouzi O.
    2021 “Social Media and Journalistic Discourse Analysis: 2019 Venezuelan Presidential Crisis.” Discourse & Communication15(1): 3–24. 10.1177/1750481320961660
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961660 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beard, Adrian
    2000The language of politics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boukala, Salomi
    2016 “Rethinking Topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon Seeking and Argumentation in Greek Media Discourses on ‘Islamist Terrorism’.” Discourse Studies18(3): 249–268. 10.1177/1461445616634550
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616634550 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bromhead, Helen
    2021 “Disaster Linguistics, Climate Change Semantics and Public Discourse Studies: a Semantically-Enhanced Discourse Study of 2011 Queensland Floods.” Language Sciences851(2021): 1–13. 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101381 [Google Scholar]
  5. Burnes, Susan
    2011 “Metaphors in Press Reports of Elections: Obama Walked on Water, but Musharraf Was Beaten by a Knockout.” Journal of Pragmatics43(8): 2160–2175. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  7. Colombo, Monica
    2018 “The Representation of the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Italy: Domopolitics, Securitization, and Humanitarian Communication in Political and Media Discourses.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2):161–178. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317896 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cotter, Colleen, Danniella Samos, and Deborah Swinglehurst
    2021 “Framing Obesity in Public Discourse: Representation through Metaphor Across Text Type.” Journal of Pragmatics1741: 14–27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davisson, Amber
    2009 “‘I’m In!’: Hillary Clinton’s 2008 Democratic Primary Campaign on You Tube.” Journal of Visual Literacy28(1): 70–91. 10.1080/23796529.2009.11674660
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2009.11674660 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunmire, Patricia L.
    2005 “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society16(4): 481–513. 10.1177/0957926505053052
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053052 [Google Scholar]
  11. Forchtner, Bernhard, and Ana Tominc
    2012 “Critique and Argumentation: On the Relation between the Discourse-historical Approach and Pragma- Dialectics.” Journal of Language and Politics11(1): 31–50. 10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for [Google Scholar]
  12. Fracchiolla, Béatrice
    2011 “Politeness as a Strategy of Attack in a Gendered Political Debate-The Royal-Sarkozy Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10): 2480–2488. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Franssila, Sanna
    2013 “Sell metaphors in American political news discourse.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences951: 418–424. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.664
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.664 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu, Rongbo
    2016 “Comparing modal patterns in Chinese-English interpreted and translated discourses in diplomatic setting: A systemic functional approach.” Babel62(1): 104–121. 10.1075/babel.62.1.06fu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.62.1.06fu [Google Scholar]
  15. Graham, Phil
    2019 “Negative Discourse Analysis and utopias of the political.” Journal of Language and Politics18(3): 323–345. 10.1075/jlp.18052.gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18052.gra [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. Matthiessen
    1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hart, Christopher, and Matteo Fuoli
    2020 “Objectification Strategies Outperform Subjectification Strategies in Military Interventionist Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics1621: 17–28. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2019 “Brexit and the Imaginary of ‘Crisis’: A Discourse- Conceptual Analysis of European News Media”. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4): 465–490. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maynard, Senko K.
    1994 “Images of Involvement and Integrity: Rhetorical Style of a Japanese Politician.” Discourse & Society5(2): 233–261. 10.1177/0957926594005002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nartey, Mark
    2019 “‘I Shall Prosecute a Ruthless War on These Monsters…’: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Discourse of Resistance in the Rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah.” Critical Discourse Studies16(2): 113–130. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1535987
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1535987 [Google Scholar]
  23. Papageorgiou, Maria Mary, and Alena Vieira
    2021 “A Friend in Need? The Sino- Russian Relationship Under the Coronavirus Crisis in Twitter: a Russian Perspective.” East Asia 2021: 1–23. 10.1007/s12140‑021‑09361‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09361-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Prasad, Ajnesh
    2020 “The Organization of Ideological Discourse in Times of Unexpected Crisis: Explaining How COVID-19 Is Exploited by Populist Leaders.” Leadership16(3): 294–302. 10.1177/1742715020926783
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715020926783 [Google Scholar]
  25. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2005Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203993712
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712 [Google Scholar]
  26. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society22(6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shakir, Abdullah, and Mohammed Farghal
    1992 “Gulf War Jokes: Cohesion and Coherence.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse12(3): 447–468. 10.1515/text.1.1992.12.3.447
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1992.12.3.447 [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson, Geoff
    2014Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203785270
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270 [Google Scholar]
  29. van Dijk, Teun
    1996 “Discourse, Power and Access.” InTexts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, eds. byCarmen R. Caldas-Coulthard and Moulthard Coulthard, 93–113. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1997 What is Political Discourse Analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 11(1):11–52. https://e-l.unifi.it/pluginfile.php/909651/mod_resource/content/1/Van%20Dijk%20Waht%20is%20political%20discourse%20analysis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Jiayu
    2016a “Narrative Mediatisation of the ‘Chinese Dream’ in Chinese and American Media.” Journal of Language and Politics15(1): 45–62. 10.1075/jlp.15.1.03wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.1.03wan [Google Scholar]
  32. 2016b “New Political and Communication Agenda for Political Discourse Analysis: Critical Reflections on Critical Discourse Analysis and Political Discourse Analysis.” International Journal of Communication101:19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3847
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2019 “Stereotyping in representing the “Chinese Dream” in news reports by CNN and BBC.” Semiotica2261: 29–48. 10.1515/sem‑2016‑0150
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0150 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, Jiayu and Guangyu Jin
    2022 “Critical Discourse Analysis in China: History and New Developments.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.909
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.909 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wolin, Sheldon S.
    2004Politics and vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400883530
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883530 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008Democracy Inc.: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zupnik, Yael-Janette
    1994 “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse.” Journal of pragmatics21(4): 339–383. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90010‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22022.wan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22022.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error