1887
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

European Union (EU) institutions are highly multilingual environments where international communication is very goal-oriented, as they produce and define policies and regulations applied to all member states. This paper aims at exploring how disagreements and conflicting opinions are conveyed in such contexts through the qualitative analysis of debates in recorded meetings of the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Two meetings from two different parliamentary terms (2014–2019 and 2019–2024) will be analyzed. The study will adopt a pragma-rhetorical approach, drawing on studies on politeness and conversation analysis techniques and focusing especially on the management of Face Threatening Acts in English turns. Attention will also be paid to language choice, codeswitching, and to the international use of English. Results show that conflict and overt disagreements in the data are very rare, with speakers displaying instead careful mitigation of the language used, especially when English is employed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22031.fra
2023-11-27
2024-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amason, Allen C.
    1996 “Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams.” Academy of Management Journal39 (1): 123–48. 10.2307/256633
    https://doi.org/10.2307/256633 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amason, Allen. C., and Harry. J. Sapienza
    1997 “The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive And Affective Conflict.” Journal of Management, 23 (4): 495–516. 10.1177/014920639702300401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300401 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, Keith
    2007 “The Pragmatics of Connotation.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (6): 1047–57. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Angouri, Jo
    2012 “Managing Disagreement in Problem Solving Meeting Talk.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1565–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher
    2012 “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1549–53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.011 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
    2020 “Parliamentary Impoliteness and the Interpreter’s Gender.” Pragmatics30 (4): 459–84. 10.1075/prag.18064.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18064.bar [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheung, Ching Ching, and Kong Bieng Chuah
    2000 “Intergroup Conflict Management Framework for Hong Kong’s Manufacturing Industry.” Engineering Management Journal12 (3): 26–33. 10.1080/10429247.2000.11415079
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2000.11415079 [Google Scholar]
  9. EEC Council
    EEC Council. “Regulation No 1 Determining the Languages to be Used by the European Economic Community.” OJ171, 6.10.1958: 385–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doerr, Nicole
    2018Political Translation: How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108355087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108355087 [Google Scholar]
  11. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
    2012 “‘A Simple Disagreement? A Row? Or a Massive Fall Out?’: On the Challenges of an Analytical Task.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1623–25. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Marianna Patrona
    2000 “Disagreements in Television Discussions: How Small Can Small Screen Arguments Be?” Pragmatics10 (3): 323–38. 10.1075/prag.10.3.03geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.3.03geo [Google Scholar]
  13. Hadjichristidis, Constantinos, Janet Geipel, and Lucia Savadori
    2015 “The Effect of Foreign Language in Judgments of Risk and Benefit: The Role of Affect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied21 (2): 117–29. 10.1037/xap0000044
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000044 [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris, Sandra
    2011 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society12 (4): 451–72. 10.1177/0957926501012004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ilie, Cornelia
    2001 “Unparliamentary Language: Insults as Cognitive Forms of Ideological Confrontation.” InLanguage and Ideology. Vol. II: Descriptive Cognitive Approaches, edited byRené Dirven, Roslyn M. Frank and Cornelia Ilie, 235–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.205.14ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.205.14ili [Google Scholar]
  16. 2003 “Histrionic and Agonistic Features of Parliamentary Discourse.” Studies in Communication Sciences3 (1): 25–53. 10.5169/seals‑791162
    https://doi.org/10.5169/seals-791162 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2006 “Parliamentary Discourses.” InEncyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics 2nd ed. Vol91, edited byKeith Brown, 188–96. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00720‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00720-3 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2010a “Identity Co-construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” InEuropean Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited byCornelia Ilie, 57–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38.04ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.04ili [Google Scholar]
  19. 2010b “Managing Dissent and Interpersonal Relations in the Romanian Parliamentary Discourse”. InEuropean Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited byCornelia Ilie, 193–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38.11ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.11ili [Google Scholar]
  20. Kecskés, Istvan
    2015 “Intercultural Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics861: 43–47. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.023 [Google Scholar]
  21. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
    2010 “Hegemonic Multilingualism in/of the EU Institutions: An Inside-Outside Perspective on the European Language Policies and Practices.” InMehrsprachigkeit Aus Der Perspektive Zweier Eu-projekte: DYLAN Meets LINEE, edited byCornelia Hülmbauer, Eva Vetter and Heike Böhringer, 115–33. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marra, Meredith
    2012 “Disagreeing without being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1580–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leal, Alice
    2021English and Translation in the European Union. Unity and Multiplicity in the Wake of Brexit. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429282812
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282812 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mehregan, Masoumeh, Eslamirasekh Abbass, Dabaghi Azizollah, and Jafari Seresht Davood
    2013 “Disagreement Expressions in the Discourse of Young Persian Speakers.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences701: 598–604. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.098
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.098 [Google Scholar]
  25. McCrae, Susan
    2009 “‘It’s a Blokes’ Thing’: Gender, Occupational Roles and Talk in the Workplace.” InGender and Spoken Interaction, edited byPia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 163–85. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230280748_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280748_8 [Google Scholar]
  26. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2004 “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society6 (2): 259–83. 10.1177/1461444804041444
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pavlenko, Aneta
    2012 “Affective Processing in Bilingual Speakers: Disembodied Cognition?” International Journal of Psychology47 (6): 405–28. 10.1080/00207594.2012.743665
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.743665 [Google Scholar]
  28. Plug, H. José
    2010 “Ad-Hominen Arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments: Strategic Manoeuvring in an Institutional Context.” InEuropean Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse Strategies and Interaction ractices, edited byCornelia Ilie, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.15plu [Google Scholar]
  29. Ringe, Nils
    2022The Language(s) of Politics Multilingual Policy-Making in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.12080141
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12080141 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sifianou, Maria
    2012 “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics441: 1580–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stojanović, Nenad and Matteo Bonotti
    2020 “Political Parties in Deeply Multilingual Polities: Institutional Conditions and Lessons for the EU.” JCMS58 (3): 599–615. 10.1111/jcms.12944
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12944 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wenger, Etienne
    1998Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wodak, Ruth, Michal. Krzyżanowski, and Bernhard Forchtner
    2012 “The Interplay of Language Ideologies and Contextual Cues in Multilingual Interactions: Language Choice and Code-switching in European Union Institutions.” Language in Society411: 157–86. 10.1017/S0047404512000036
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000036 [Google Scholar]
  34. Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts
    2010 “Patterns of Interaction in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: On the Pragmasemantics of Unauthorized Interruptive Comments.” InEuropean Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction practices, edited byCornelia Ilie, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38.08zim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38.08zim [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22031.fra
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error