1887
Volume 22, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the shifting boundaries in populist discourses in China, with a focus on how the political leader’s discourse socially constructs the people. By combining critical and post-structuralist discourse analysis, we argue firstly that prevalent Western-centric approaches to the study of populism only partially capture the notion of the people in contemporary China, the study of which requires a mixture of elements from these approaches. Secondly, that the image of a Chinese people embracing the Chinese Dream and the promise for a New China, is narrated in a context where the Chinese Communist Party infuses all levels of society with messages of development, prosperity, peace and freedom. And thirdly, that while previous leaders would normally address the people in a formal and detached way, the distance between leadership and the people has been reduced in the Xi Jinping era.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22032.fan
2023-05-22
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrew, Arato
    2019 “Socialism and populism.” inConstellations261: 464–474. 10.1111/1467‑8675.12428
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12428 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arato, A. and Cohen, J. L.
    2018 “Civil society, populism, and religion.” Routledge handbook of global populism, pp.98–112, Routledge. 10.4324/9781315226446‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arditi, Benjamín
    2010 “Populism is Hegemony is Politics?On Ernesto Laclau’s On Populist Reason.” Review Essay inConstellations17 (3): 488–497. 10.1111/j.1467‑8675.2010.00587.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00587.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslanidis, Paris
    2016 “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and a New Perspective.” inPolitical Studies64(1S): 88–104. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12224
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224 [Google Scholar]
  5. Borriello, Arthur and Jäger Anton
    2020 “The antinomies of Ernesto Laclau: a reassessment.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 10.1080/13569317.2020.1855775
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1855775 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Kathy and Mondon, Aurelien
    2021 “Populism, the media, and the mainstreaming of the far right: The Guardian’s coverage of populism as a case study.” Politics41(3): 279–295. 10.1177/0263395720955036
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720955036 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brubaker, Rogers
    2009 “Ethnicity, Race and Nationalism.” inAnnual Review of Sociology351: 21–42. 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑070308‑115916
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115916 [Google Scholar]
  8. Canovan, Margaret
    1999 “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” inPolitical StudiesXLVII1: 2–16. 10.1111/1467‑9248.00184
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cappelletti, Alessandra
    2019Socio-economic development in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region: Disparities and power struggle in China’s North-West, Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edelman, Marc
    2021 “Hollowed out Heartland, USA: How capital sacrificed communities and paved the way for authoritarian populism.” inJournal of Rural Studies821: 505–517. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.045
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.045 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eke, Steven and Kuzio, Taras
    2000 “Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus.” inEurope-Asia Studies52 (3): 523–547. 10.1080/713663061
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713663061 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fanoulis, Evangelos and Guerra, Simona
    2021 “Aporias in Greece and Spain’s Left-Wing Inclusionary Populism.” New Political Science43 (3): 339–354. 10.1080/07393148.2021.1954438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2021.1954438 [Google Scholar]
  13. Freeden, Michael
    2017 “After the Brexit referendum: revisiting populism as an ideology.” inJournal of Political Ideologies22(1): 1–11. 10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813 [Google Scholar]
  14. Friedman, Jonathan
    2000System, Structure, and Contradiction: The Evolution of ‘Asiatic’ Social Formations, AltaMira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garrick, John and Yan Chang, Bennet
    2018 “Xi Jinping Thought” Realisation of the Chinese Dream of National Rejuvenation?.” inChina Perspectives1–2 (113): 99–106. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.7872
    https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.7872 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, Stuart
    1985 “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist Debates.” inCritical Studies in Mass Communication2 (2): 91–114. 10.1080/15295038509360070
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038509360070 [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrel, Stevan
    2001 “Ethnicity and Acculturation: Some Little Groups”. inWays of Being Ethnic in Souhwest China, University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hua, Gao
    2018 “Seizing the Power of Ideological “Interpretation.” inHow the Red Sun Rose: The Origins and Development of the Yan’an Rectification Movement, 1930–1945, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press. 10.2307/j.ctvbtzp48.12
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbtzp48.12 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefaan
    2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study ofpolitical parties’ discourse in Belgium.” inEuropean Journal of Political Research461: 319–345. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2006.00690.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, K. Cristopher
    2017 “Chinese Politics Has No Rules, But It May Be Good if Xi Jinping Breaks Them.” research paper, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaltwasser, Crist´obal Rovira
    2014 “Latin American Populism: Some Conceptual and Normative Lessons.” inConstellations21(4). 10.1111/1467‑8675.12125
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12125 [Google Scholar]
  22. Katsambekis, Giorgos
    2020 “Constructing ‘the people’ of populism: a critique of the ideational approach from a discursive perspective.” Journal of Political Ideologies, 10.1080/13569317.2020.1844372
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1844372 [Google Scholar]
  23. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason, Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Moffitt, Benjamin
    2016The global rise of populism: performance, political style, and representation, Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Moffitt, Benjamin and Tormey, Simon
    2014 “Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation andPolitical Style.” Political Studies62(2): 381–397. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032 [Google Scholar]
  26. Morelock, Jeremiah
    2018Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism, University of Westminster Press. 10.16997/book30
    https://doi.org/10.16997/book30 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mudde, Cas
    2017 “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” The Oxford Handbook of Populism, pp.27–47. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” inGovernment and Opposition39(4): 541–563. 10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2004.00135.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Mullaney, Thomas
    2010Coming to Terms with the Nation. Ethnic Classification in Modern China, University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nagel, Joane
    1994 “Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture.” inSocial Problems41(1): 152–176. 10.2307/3096847
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3096847 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rooduijn, Matthijs
    2014 “The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in WesternEuropean Media.” inPolitical Studies621: 726–744. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12074
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rogers, Samuel
    2020 “Hungarian authoritarian populism: a neo-Gramscian perspective.” inEast European Politics36(1): 107–123. 10.1080/21599165.2019.1687087
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1687087 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sambanis, Nicholas and Shayo, Moses
    2013 “Social Identification and Ethnic Conflict.” inThe American Political Science Review, 107 (2): 294–325. 10.1017/S0003055413000038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000038 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2021 “The (discursive) limits of (left) populism.” Journal of Language and Politics20(1): 162–177. 10.1075/jlp.20047.sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20047.sta [Google Scholar]
  35. 2014 “The Return of “the People”: Populism and Anti-Populism in the Shadow of the European Crisis.” InConstellations21(4): 506–517. 10.1111/1467‑8675.12127
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12127 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stavrakakis, Yannis and Katsambekis, Giorgos
    2014 “Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies191: 119–142. 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266 [Google Scholar]
  37. Taggart, Paul
    2004 “Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe.” inJournal of Political Ideologies9(3): 269–288. 10.1080/1356931042000263528
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263528 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tai, Zixue
    2015 “Networked Resistance: Digital Populism, Online Activism, and Mass Dissent in China.” inPopular Communication131: 120–131. 10.1080/15405702.2015.1021469
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2015.1021469 [Google Scholar]
  39. Thompson, Mark
    2016 “The Moral Economy of Electoralism and the Rise of Populism in the Philippines and Thailand.” inJournal of Developing Societies32(3): 246–269. 10.1177/0169796X16652028
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X16652028 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tang, Wenfang
    2016Populist Authoritarianism Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190205782.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190205782.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Townsend, James
    1977 “Chinese Populism and the Legacy of Mao Tse-Tung.” inAsian Survey17(11): 1003–1015. 10.2307/2643349
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2643349 [Google Scholar]
  42. Urbinati, Nadia
    1998 “Democracy and Populism.” inConstellations5(1): 110–124. 10.1111/1467‑8675.00080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00080 [Google Scholar]
  43. Weyland, Kurt
    2021 “Populism as a Political Strategy: An Approach’s Enduring – and Increasing – Advantages.” inPolitical Studies69(2): 185–189. 10.1177/00323217211002669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211002669 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wodak, Ruth
    2022Far-right Populist Discourses, Routledge. 10.4324/9781003250388‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003250388-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wodak, Ruth, Culpeper, Jonathan and Semino, Elena
    2021 “Shameless normalisation of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences.” InDiscourse & Society32(3): 369–393. 10.1177/0957926520977217
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977217 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wodak, Ruth and Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2017 “Right-wing populism in Europe & USA: Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’” inJournal of Language and Politics16(4): 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
  47. Ying, Miao
    2020 “Can China be populist? Grassroot populist narratives in the Chinese cyberspace.” inContemporary Politics26(3): 268–287. 10.1080/13569775.2020.1727398
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1727398 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zang, Dongsheng
    2010 “Rise of Political Populism and the Trouble with the Legal Profession in China.” inHarvard China Review6(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zappettini, Franco
    2021 “The mediatisation of Brexit: Actors, agendas and allegories.” inEuropean Journal of Communication36(5): 527–531. 10.1177/02673231211039826
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211039826 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zappettini, Franco and Maccaferri, Marzia
    2021 “Euroscepticism between Populism and Technocracy: The Case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle.” InJournal of Contemporary European Research, 17(2). 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1184
    https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1184 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zappettini, Franco, and Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 “The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media & Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis.” InCritical Discourse Studies161: 381–388. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zeng, Jinghang
    2016The Chinese Communist Party Capacity to Rule. Routledge. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑53368‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-53368-5 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Chenchen
    2020 “Right-wing populism with Chinese characteristics? Identity, otherness and global imaginaries in debating world politics online.” inEuropean Journal of International Relations26(1): 88–115. 10.1177/1354066119850253
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119850253 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zweig, Noah
    2018 “Rethinking the Venezuelan Media Presidency: Populism/Authoritarianism and “Spectacular Modernity.” inInternational Journal of Communication121: 3349–3367.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22032.fan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22032.fan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese Communist Party; discourse analysis; populism; unity in diversity; Xi Jinping
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error